Nothing can shame people unfazed by Ram temple donation theft: Allahabad High Court

Prayagraj, The Allahabad High Court has delivered a scathing critique of systemic corruption in Indian institutions, stating that nothing can shame those who remain unfazed by the alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya. Justice Atul Sreedharan, presiding over a split verdict concerning the controversial "bulldozer justice" practices, expressed deep concern over the normalization of corruption within society. He emphasized that the theft of donations at the Ram temple exemplifies the lowest point of public integrity in India. The judge’s remarks came during his analysis of the ongoing dispute surrounding the demolition of homes owned by individuals accused of violating municipal codes. In his 51-page judgment, Justice Sreedharan condemned the continued practice of immediate house demolitions following alleged offenses, describing it as a means to satisfy societal demands fueled by a long-standing culture of "bulldozer justice." He argued that such actions occur with impunity, as if Supreme Court rulings hold little weight or consequence for those in power. Highlighting the broader implications of unchecked corruption, the judge pointed out that unauthorised structures often emerge due to deliberate negligence by authorities. He stated that officials either turn a blind eye to illegal constructions because of political or bureaucratic backing or act out of dishonesty. These officials, he claimed, facilitate the creation of non-compliant housing by accepting bribes from developers, ultimately leaving unsuspecting buyers to face sudden evictions years later. Justice Sreedharan further criticized the state for its complicity in enabling such activities, noting that it provides essential services like water and electricity to these unlawful structures. This, he argued, constitutes active participation in criminal behavior. The judge stressed that this collective failure of integrity permeates all levels of governance, including development authorities. He warned that widespread corruption risks concentrating wealth in the hands of a few, thereby widening the gap between the rich and poor. Such disparities, he cautioned, could eventually lead to civil unrest. To address this crisis, Justice Sreedharan called for drastic legislative reforms, urging the state to amend the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to impose the death penalty on those found guilty of corruption. In addition to his call for legal reform, the judge expressed disappointment over India’s ranking in global transparency indices. Despite the country’s low position in the Transparency International 2025 report, he noted that this does not shame the population, as many citizens have become desensitized to corruption. He described the current situation as the “last straw” on the camel’s back, symbolizing the lowest point of national integrity. The judge also criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for its handling of the situation, suggesting that its actions reflect a deeper systemic problem. His comments underscored the need for a comprehensive overhaul of institutional frameworks to restore public trust and curb corrupt practices. As the court continues to monitor developments, the implications of these remarks will likely influence future policy decisions and legal reforms aimed at addressing the root causes of corruption in Indian society.