The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has completed the processing of over 99.7% of re-evaluation and verification requests submitted by students who appeared for the Class XII examinations in 2026. This announcement comes amid ongoing disputes involving a student named Vedant Shrivastava, who has become central to a broader controversy concerning the accuracy and fairness of the CBSE's evaluation process. The board has clarified that the majority of re-evaluation applications have been addressed, with the remaining cases expected to be resolved within a few days.
The situation escalated when Vedant Shrivastava, a Class XII student, claimed that his marks had only increased by two points following the re-evaluation process. He stated that he had applied for re-evaluation of 11 questions and received just one additional mark in Mathematics and one in Computer Science. In a video uploaded to social media, he expressed frustration over the perceived discrepancy in the evaluation process. However, the CBSE swiftly refuted his claims, calling them "factually incorrect" and a "blatant lie." The board emphasized that the re-evaluation process had indeed led to a significant increase in his scores, particularly in Physics.
Vedant's initial concern stemmed from an earlier incident where he discovered that the Physics answer sheet provided to him after the results were declared did not match his own. He raised this issue publicly, leading to widespread discussion about potential flaws in the CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system, which was introduced for the first time in 2026. The CBSE eventually acknowledged the error and provided him with the correct answer sheet, which resulted in an increase in his Physics score from 65 to 74. Vedant then proceeded to apply for re-evaluation, suspecting further inaccuracies in the scoring.
The CBSE's response to Vedant's subsequent claims highlights a critical point of contention. According to the board, Vedant's Physics theory marks increased from 35 to 44, amounting to a nine-point rise. Additionally, his Mathematics theory marks rose from 46 to 47, and his Computer Science theory marks increased from 61 to 62. These changes collectively contributed to an 11-point increase in his total score across the three subjects. Vedant, however, argues that the nine-point increase in Physics was not due to the re-evaluation process but rather a correction made after the initial answer sheet mix-up. He maintains that the re-evaluation itself only accounted for a two-point increase in his scores.
The controversy surrounding Vedant's case has drawn attention to the broader implications of the OSM system's implementation. Students and educators alike have raised concerns about the reliability of the new evaluation method, citing instances of answer sheet mix-ups and discrepancies in scoring. The CBSE has faced scrutiny over its handling of these issues, with some critics suggesting that the board's response has been inadequate in addressing the underlying problems with the OSM system. As the re-evaluation process nears completion, the focus remains on resolving the specific grievances raised by Vedant and ensuring transparency in the evaluation procedures.
The dispute between Vedant and the CBSE underscores the need for a thorough review of the OSM system's effectiveness and the mechanisms in place for addressing student concerns. With the majority of re-evaluation cases now resolved, the CBSE must continue to engage with students and stakeholders to address lingering doubts and ensure that the evaluation process is fair and accurate. The resolution of Vedant's case will likely set a precedent for how similar issues are handled in the future, influencing the perception of the CBSE's commitment to academic integrity and student welfare.
4 reports
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 902 days agoThe Indian government has revised the appointment of Lokhande Prashant Sitaram, a senior IAS officer, as chairperson of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). Initially appointed as a full-time chairperson in June, his role has now been changed to 'additional charge,' allowing him to continue serving as an additional secretary in the Union home ministry. This shift follows a major restructuring of CBSE's leadership triggered by controversies around the On-Screen Marking (OSM) system, which faced allegations of irregularities in the digital evaluation process. The government also transferred previous CBSE chairperson Rahul Singh to the agriculture ministry and initiated an inquiry into the OSM system's procurement. The current arrangement suggests Lokhande will serve in an interim capacity until a permanent chairperson is appointed.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding administrative changes within the CBSE and does not exhibit overt bias toward any political side. It outlines the sequence of events and decisions made by the government without using loaded language or emphasizing one perspective over another.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 90): Factual details align with cross-source consensus on the revision of Lokhande's appointment. Objectivity is high as the article presents facts without evident bias.
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 806 days ago CBSE vs Vedant Shrivastava: Class 12 student disputes board's claim on re-evaluation marksA Class 12 student, Vedant Shrivastava, disputed the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)'s claim regarding his re-evaluation results. He stated that he only received a two-mark increase across two subjects, while the CBSE asserted that his Physics score had risen by nine marks. Vedant argued that the Physics increase was due to an initial error in evaluating his answer sheet, not the re-evaluation process. The CBSE dismissed his claims as 'factually incorrect' and a 'blatant lie,' stating that nearly all re-evaluation requests had been processed. This dispute follows an earlier incident where Vedant reported a mix-up in his Physics exam paper, leading to widespread online criticism before gaining significant public support.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Vedant Shrivastava's claims and the CBSE's response without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties and does not exhibit clear bias in language or framing.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 80): Factual claims are somewhat inconsistent with cross-source consensus on Vedant's re-evaluation results. Objectivity is moderate as the article presents both sides but leans slightly toward CBSE's stance.
India TodayIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 806 days agoVedant Srivastava, a CBSE Class 12 student, initially claimed that his marks increased by only two after re-evaluation, but the Ministry of Education clarified that his total increase was actually 11 marks. The discrepancy arose from a Physics answer-sheet mix-up that led to public scrutiny of CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system. Vedant's initial claim was based on a misunderstanding of his scores, as his Physics marks increased by nine, Mathematics by one, and Computer Science by one. The Ministry stated that Vedant's assertion was 'factually incorrect' and a 'blatant lie.' This incident has reignited debates about the reliability of CBSE's evaluation process, particularly following the OSM system's rollout. The controversy highlights ongoing concerns among students regarding transparency and accuracy in grading.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Vedant's claims and the Ministry's rebuttal without overtly favoring either side. It reports the factual dispute between the student and the educational authority without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue involves a public institution and potential systemic
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 80): Factual claims are somewhat inconsistent with cross-source consensus on Vedant's mark increases. Objectivity is moderate as the article presents both sides but shows slight favoritism toward CBSE's position.
India TodayIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 856 days ago CBSE vs Vedanta: The Physics marks controversy explainedA controversy between the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and student Vedant Srivastava revolves around the interpretation of revised Physics marks following an answer sheet exchange. Vedant claims that the nine additional marks in Physics were not due to re-evaluation but rather the correction of an initial error caused by the swapped answer sheets. He asserts that the re-evaluation only increased his scores in Mathematics and Computer Science by one mark each. However, CBSE disputes this, stating that the nine-mark increase in Physics was indeed part of the re-evaluation process and that the overall gain across all three subjects was 11 marks. The disagreement highlights concerns over the transparency and accuracy of CBSE's evaluation procedures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Vedant Srivastava's claims and CBSE's official response without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the factual discrepancies and interpretations provided by both parties. There is no evident loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or clear o
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 85): Factual claims show some discrepancy with cross-source consensus on Vedant's mark increases. Objectivity is good as the article remains neutral between Vedant's and CBSE's positions.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
India
