A 20-year-old law student at Gautam Buddha University, Akshat Tripathi, was issued a show-cause notice by the Greater Noida Executive Magistrate in late August 2026, demanding a Rs 5 lakh bond to ensure peace, following allegations of spreading anti-government statements during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) protests in July. The notice was based on charges under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) Sections 126 and 130. However, the order was revoked after an investigation. This follows a Supreme Court ruling on September 1 that quashed FIRs against CJP protesters, except for those with criminal records. Tripathi, who has been absent from the university since May and was working at the Allahabad High Court in July, denied the allegations, claiming he could not have provoked others. CJP co-convener Saurav Das criticized the magistrate’s decision, citing the Supreme Court’s order and called for immediate government action.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the legality of the show-cause notice in light of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling, emphasizing the rights of protesters and criticizing the magistrate’s actions. The tone supports the CJP’s position and highlights the conflict between state authority and civil不服



