4 reports
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow Lotoc: Actual sedition not required to charge inciting to sedition vs VP DuterteVice President Sara Duterte faces an incitement to sedition charge from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), according to NBI Regional Director Jeremy Lotoc. During a hearing related to Duterte's impeachment, Lotoc clarified that actual sedition is not required for such charges, emphasizing that intent to overthrow the government or disrupt public order suffices. He argued that Duterte's alleged comments about hiring a hitman to target President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and others pose a threat to public safety and governmental stability. Lotoc highlighted the role of public officials as models and warned that unchecked behavior by leaders could lead to broader societal unrest.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal reasoning behind the incitement to sedition charge without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. It reports on the legal interpretation provided by an official (Jeremy Lotoc) and contextualizes it within the ongoing impeachment proceedings. While the subject is
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow WATCH: Lotoc says info on ‘Operation Romanov’ unreliableDuring Day 5 of the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, prosecution witness Jeremy Lotoc, an official from the National Bureau of Investigation, testified that the information provided by Princess Maui regarding the alleged 'Operation Romanov' was not reliable. The testimony occurred during questioning by Senator-Judge Erwin Tulfo. This development highlights ongoing scrutiny of evidence presented against Vice President Duterte, with particular focus on claims related to corruption or misconduct. The case continues to unfold as more witnesses, including Zuleika Lopez, are expected to provide testimony.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual testimony from a prosecution witness without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the reliability of information provided by a named individual (Princess Maui) and does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal process
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow WATCH: Info from ‘Princess Maui’ on ‘Romanov’ unreliable – LotocDuring the fifth day of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial, Jeremy Lotoc, the Bangsamoro regional director of the National Bureau of Investigation, stated that information provided by 'Princess Maui' regarding the alleged 'Operation Romanov' against Duterte was not reliable. The statement came during Lotoc's cross-examination by defense lawyer Jeremy Lotoc. Senator-Judge Erwin Tulfo posed the question about 'Operation Romanov' to Lotoc.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a legal proceeding involving a high-profile political figure, without overtly favoring any particular side. While the subject matter is politically charged, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the testimony and questioning rather than taking a clear立场 on
RapplerIndependentCenter7 hr. ago No threats found vs Sara Duterte, says NBIDuring the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, an NBI official named Jeremy Lotoc testified that the agency did not find evidence of threats against her life. Lotoc explained that the NBI only identified the removal of 75 personnel from her security detail as a relevant security issue. He noted that Duterte did not appear before the NBI, and thus no further information was provided. The defense had previously argued that the lack of security threats undermined the impeachment charge of grave threats against the Marcos family. However, Lotoc clarified that the term 'Romanov' was first used by Duterte's brother, Davao City Mayor Baste Duterte, in a public critique of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The defense also raised concerns about potential bias in the NBI's investigation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the testimony from both the prosecution and defense perspectives. It reports on the NBI's findings without overtly favoring either side, though it highlights the defense's arguments regarding perceived bias. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the fact
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter