'No shorts' sparks protest at DU's St Stephen's College on first day of new session

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenter3 hr. ago

Delhi University's St. Stephen's College faced significant backlash after issuing a circular banning students from wearing shorts in various areas of the campus, including classrooms, labs, and dining halls. Students criticized the rule as 'moral policing' and an infringement on personal freedom, noting that while the practice had existed informally for years, this was the first time it was formally enforced. The circular, dated July 26, emphasized adherence to campus dress codes and introduced additional rules like a smoke-free campus and mandatory ID card checks. Despite the controversy, Delhi University officially welcomed the new academic session, encouraging incoming students to embrace college life.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the students' objections to the dress code and the college administration's stance without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from students and references the college's official circular, providing balanced perspectives on the issue.

Times of IndiaIndependentProgressive16 hr. ago

Delhi University's St Stephen's College has introduced a formal policy prohibiting students from wearing shorts in specific areas such as classrooms, assembly halls, libraries, dining halls, and chapels. The policy, signed by new principal Susan Elias, has sparked protests among students who view it as an intrusion into personal clothing choices and moral policing. Some students claim the restriction applies to all members, while others argue it disproportionately affects sports team members who face entry issues to the mess after practice. Although teachers acknowledge informal discouragement of shorts in certain areas for years, they note this is the first time the policy has been officially communicated. Faculty members suggest the notice may have limited practical impact, citing no prior enforcement of similar rules.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the policy as an example of 'moral policing' and an 'intrusion into personal clothing choices,' suggesting a critical stance toward institutional control over student behavior. While the policy itself is presented as a formal regulation, the emphasis on student autonomy and the de