The ruling Janata Dal (United) in Bihar has categorically denied any intention to review the state’s liquor prohibition law, according to officials. A senior party leader stated that the decision remains firm, emphasizing that the law will not be revisited under any circumstances. This clarification comes amid ongoing political tensions related to recent protests and allegations involving law enforcement actions during student demonstrations. The controversy began on July 25, when members of left-leaning student organizations organized demonstrations across multiple districts in Bihar, supporting a statewide strike known as the Bihar Bandh. The strike was initially called in response to concerns regarding the leakage of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) papers and perceived harsh police actions against protesters. However, the protests escalated into violence in several locations, including Patna, Saran, Siwan, Aurangabad, Bhagalpur, Sitamarhi, Purnia, and Bhojpur. In these areas, demonstrators reportedly threw stones and bricks at police personnel, resulting in the detention of several students. In some regions, the protests remained relatively peaceful, with mild gatherings reported in Samastipur, Nawada, Nalanda, Madhubani, and Sheikhpura. During the unrest in Siwan, a video circulating online appeared to show a police constable using an AK-47 rifle during the confrontation with protesters. The footage went viral on social media platforms, sparking public outrage and calls for accountability. Following this incident, the constable was suspended from duty. However, independent verification of the video’s authenticity could not be confirmed by the Press Trust of India (PTI). Despite the suspension, the issue remains a point of contention among local activists and opposition leaders. In response to the situation, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav announced plans for a protest march to the Lok Bhavan on August 19, demanding transparency and justice over the alleged misuse of firearms by police during the student demonstrations. Yadav’s call for the march has drawn criticism from within the ruling party. Sanjay Jha, the national working president of the JD(U), accused Yadav of engaging in “part-time politics” in Bihar, suggesting that he has been absent from the state during critical moments of the protests. According to Jha, Yadav had been traveling abroad when students were demonstrating at Jantar Mantar in Delhi, returning only after their demands were seemingly met. Jha further argued that Yadav should focus on addressing issues in Ranchi, where students are protesting over alleged irregularities in recruitment exams. He noted that the Mahagathbandhan government, which includes the RJD as one of its constituents, is currently in charge of the region and urged Yadav to engage directly with the state administration on these matters. Jha also expressed skepticism about the necessity of organizing a march over the alleged use of the AK-47, stating that appropriate action had already been taken against the involved officer. His comments highlight the growing divide between the ruling party and the opposition, particularly concerning how best to address public grievances and maintain law and order during large-scale protests. As the political landscape continues to shift, the upcoming August 19 march remains a focal point of debate. Whether it will proceed as planned or face further challenges from internal party dynamics and external pressures remains uncertain. Meanwhile, the broader implications of the protests and their impact on governance and public trust continue to unfold.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
India
