NNPC’s N7.13tn: What does Nigeria have to show for it, ADC asks
The African Democratic Congress (ADC), Nigeria's main opposition party, has called on the federal government and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to provide a detailed explanation of N7.13 trillion allocated to 'energy security' in the company's 2024 financial statements. The ADC questions whether this massive expenditure has resulted in safer oil infrastructure, stronger energy security, increased public revenue, or tangible benefits for ordinary citizens amid growing economic challenges. The party specifically highlights concerns about potential misuse of funds, linking them to Government Ekpemupolo, a prominent pipeline surveillance contractor and supporter of President Bola Tinubu's re-election campaign. The ADC demands transparency regarding the allocation of these funds, including the recipients of contracts, amounts paid, outcomes achieved, and independent assessments of their value. They argue that large-scale public spending should be thoroughly scrutinized to ensure accountability.
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has intensified its criticism of President Bola Tinubu's economic policies, demanding he either abandon them or resign, citing worsening poverty and hunger as justification. According to a statement issued by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, recent data from international development agencies reveal that 139 million Nigerians now live below the national poverty line, with 17 million facing acute hunger. The ADC argues that these figures underscore the human toll of the federal government’s economic strategies and call for immediate accountability. The ADC’s critique follows ongoing debates over the effectiveness of Tinubu’s administration, which has implemented several economic reforms since taking office in May 2023. These include the removal of petrol subsidies, exchange rate liberalisation, and changes to tax policies. While the government highlights improvements in public revenue, foreign exchange reserves, and investor confidence, the ADC contends that these metrics have not translated into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens. Instead, the party accuses the administration of perpetuating “ruinous economic policies” that prioritize statistical success over real-world outcomes. Abdullahi emphasized that the ADC has consistently warned against celebrating economic indicators without considering their impact on everyday life. He stated that the Tinubu-led All Progressives Congress (APC) government’s focus on growth and revenue has failed to address the root causes of poverty or safeguard livelihoods. The party further criticized the government for framing reckless fiscal decisions as bold moves and for dismissing genuine concerns as unnecessary burdens. In addition to condemning the economic policies, the ADC dismissed the government’s social interventions as insufficient. It argued that temporary measures, such as food aid or cash transfers, cannot resolve deep-seated issues like food insecurity and unemployment. Instead, the party proposed a comprehensive strategy aimed at transforming Nigeria’s economic landscape. This includes securing farming communities, rehabilitating 264 abandoned dams to enhance irrigation, improving access to quality agricultural inputs, and strengthening value chains to boost food production and affordability. The ADC also outlined plans to develop regional agricultural production hubs, reduce transportation costs, and invest in storage and processing facilities. It pledged to increase funding for nutrition, healthcare, education, and vocational training, emphasizing that economic success should be measured by improved living standards rather than abstract numbers. The party framed its proposals as a necessary shift from a system that values government statistics over people’s well-being. The ADC’s demands come amid broader scrutiny of the Tinubu administration’s handling of public finances. In separate developments, the party has questioned the allocation of N7.13 trillion spent by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) on energy security. The ADC has called for a detailed breakdown of how these funds were utilized, arguing that such expenditures should not remain shrouded in secrecy given the nation’s economic challenges. The party has also raised concerns about potential misuse of public resources, particularly linking the spending to political campaigns led by Government Ekpemupolo, known as Tompolo. This growing pressure reflects a wider discontent among Nigerians, who continue to grapple with high inflation, limited job opportunities, and declining purchasing power. The ADC’s stance aligns with calls for greater transparency and accountability, especially as the government faces increasing expectations to deliver meaningful change. With the upcoming election cycle approaching, the party’s criticisms may gain more traction, forcing policymakers to confront the gap between economic performance and public welfare. For now, the ADC remains committed to holding the administration accountable for its promises and its track record.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The African Democratic Congress (ADC), a Nigerian opposition party, has criticized President Bola Tinubu's economic policies, accusing them of exacerbating poverty and hunger. The party cites recent data showing 139 million Nigerians live below the poverty line and 17 million face acute hunger, claiming these figures demonstrate the failure of Tinubu's administration to improve citizens' welfare despite celebrating economic growth and foreign exchange reserves. The ADC argues that government efforts to frame economic progress as success ignore the reality of deteriorating living conditions and calls for Tinubu to resign or change course. The party also dismisses the government's social programs as insufficient and proposes alternative measures like improving agricultural infrastructure and ensuring food security.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of President Tinubu's economic policies as a moral and humanitarian imperative, emphasizing the suffering of ordinary Nigerians and condemning the government's approach as 'reckless' and 'wicked.' The language used suggests a left-leaning perspective by highlighting贫
Why factuality (85): The article cites specific statistics about poverty and hunger in Nigeria, referencing international development agencies' reports. While no primary source document was available, these figures align with cross-source consensus on the economic challenges facing Nigeria under President Tinubu. The ar
Why objectivity (65): The tone of the article leans toward criticism of the Tinubu administration, using strong language like 'catastrophic failure' and 'ruinous economic policies.' It presents the ADC's position as authoritative but does not provide counterpoints or balance the perspective with government responses, lea
Vanguard NigeriaIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 654 days ago
The article discusses Nigeria's failure to adopt successful policies implemented by other nations, using the example of football governance reforms. It highlights how countries like Côte d'Ivoire, Senegal, Algeria, Tunisia, and Uruguay have taken decisive action—such as sacking coaches and restructuring federations—following poor performance in international tournaments. The author argues that Nigeria's lack of similar accountability and reform efforts undermines its ability to improve governance and sports administration. The piece calls for President Bola Tinubu to lead necessary changes in football governance.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the need for accountability and reform in Nigerian football governance as a pressing issue requiring strong leadership, aligning with progressive values. While it presents examples of other countries taking action, it emphasizes the urgency of change in Nigeria, suggesting a left-
Why factuality (60): This article discusses football governance reforms in Nigeria, referencing experts and stakeholders but lacking specific sources or data to support claims about policy failures or success. It references examples from other countries but does not clearly connect them to Nigeria's situation. The conte
Why objectivity (65): The tone leans toward criticism of Nigerian governance without offering balanced perspectives or counterarguments. The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'ironically' and 'struggle,' suggesting a negative view of Nigeria's political system without providing sufficient context or alter
The African Democratic Congress (ADC), Nigeria's main opposition party, has called on the federal government and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to provide a detailed explanation of N7.13 trillion allocated to 'energy security' in the company's 2024 financial statements. The ADC questions whether this massive expenditure has resulted in safer oil infrastructure, stronger energy security, increased public revenue, or tangible benefits for ordinary citizens amid growing economic challenges. The party specifically highlights concerns about potential misuse of funds, linking them to Government Ekpemupolo, a prominent pipeline surveillance contractor and supporter of President Bola Tinubu's re-election campaign. The ADC demands transparency regarding the allocation of these funds, including the recipients of contracts, amounts paid, outcomes achieved, and independent assessments of their value. They argue that large-scale public spending should be thoroughly scrutinized to ensure accountability.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the ADC's call for transparency and accountability regarding public spending by the NNPC and the federal government. While the ADC is an opposition party, the article does not exhibit overt bias toward either side. It reports the party's concerns and demands without taking a立场,
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
NG
