In late March 2026, a significant development unfolded in Serbia as investigations into the death of a female student at the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade uncovered evidence that challenged a major narrative circulating in public discourse. The Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade announced that during a search of the Faculty’s premises on March 27, 2026, they temporarily seized documentation related to a plenum of several faculties. Among this material was an act detailing a meeting held by the organization "Students in Blockade – Roof Working Group for Security" (KRBG) on January 22, 2025. During this meeting, discussions reportedly included references to a so-called "sound cannon," suggesting that its use could provoke a mass response from Brussels. Additionally, there were mentions of practices observed in China involving removing individuals from their path when confronted with such devices.
This revelation has sparked a broader political and social reckoning within Serbia, particularly concerning the narrative surrounding President Aleksandar Vučić. The claims about the sound cannon had previously fueled speculation that Vučić might have used lethal force against his own citizens, which led to widespread condemnation and accusations of dehumanization aimed at the president. However, these allegations now appear to be based on fabricated information designed to undermine the legitimacy of the government and incite unrest.
The implications of this discovery extend beyond the immediate incident. It has prompted a reassessment of the motivations behind the anti-Vučić campaign, which has been characterized by repeated attempts to portray him as a criminal, corrupt figure, and even a non-Serb due to his father being of Albanian descent. These efforts have also targeted his family, suggesting moral turpitude and questioning the legitimacy of his leadership. Such narratives have been employed repeatedly over the past decade, including allegations linking him to human trafficking and other serious crimes.
President Vučić himself has addressed these issues directly, emphasizing the importance of unity among Serbs and the need to focus on national progress rather than divisive rhetoric. In a recent address, he underscored that the country must remain united in love for Serbia, stating that only through solidarity can the nation achieve success. He also highlighted upcoming plans for a large gathering scheduled for June 27, where he intends to present a comprehensive vision for the future of Serbia, including economic policies, wage increases, pension reforms, and a message of political unity.
Legal experts and analysts have weighed in on the situation, noting that the alleged use of a sound cannon appears to be entirely unfounded. Attorney Dragoslav Ljubičanović pointed out that it was clear as early as March 15 that such a device was not actually deployed. He emphasized that those responsible for spreading these rumors likely intended to justify further dehumanization of state authorities and potentially incite armed conflict within the country. This perspective aligns with statements made by President Vučić, who has explicitly outlined the goals of those opposing him, describing them as seeking to transform him into a monstrous figure unfit to lead the nation.
As the investigation continues, the political landscape in Serbia remains tense. Analysts predict that parliamentary elections will take place either late in the summer or early in the autumn, most likely in October. If the ruling coalition wins these elections, Vučić may then step down from the presidency to become prime minister. This scenario would allow for a more stable transition of power while maintaining public support. Regardless of the outcome, the current developments highlight the ongoing struggle between those advocating for national unity under Vučić's leadership and those promoting division and instability. The resolution of these tensions will be crucial in determining the trajectory of Serbia's political future.
8 reports
KurirParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 8517 days agoPresident of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić posted a message on his official Instagram account emphasizing unity as crucial for the country's future, especially amid internal and external challenges. He highlighted that unity is key to Serbia's success and mentioned an upcoming large gathering in Belgrade on June 27, where plans and programs for the country's future, including economic policy, wages, pensions, and political unity, will be presented.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a public statement by President Vučić emphasizing national unity without taking a stance on the content of his message or its implications. The framing is neutral, focusing on the event and the message itself rather than endorsing or criticizing it.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately describes the events of the second day of the visit, including meetings and cultural activities. The tone remains mostly neutral despite some personal reflections from Vučić.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 7513 days agoThe article discusses President Aleksandar Vučić's upcoming major event on June 27th, where he will address key topics related to his candidacy and campaign plans. Vučić invited all citizens to gather under the flag of Serbia, emphasizing unity and avoiding anger or revenge. He mentioned that the presidential and parliamentary elections will take place either in October or November, once the relevant institution decides. Vučić did not confirm whether he would run for prime minister but promised to discuss everything at the event. The event will include the official announcement of the name of the ruling coalition's electoral list. Vučić emphasized rationality and love for the country over hatred and called for a peaceful gathering.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Vučić's statements neutrally, focusing on his planned announcements and rhetoric without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from Vučić and does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article provides factual information about Vučić's upcoming speech and emphasizes unity, maintaining a mostly neutral and objective tone.
Večernje novostiParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 7013 days agoPresident of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić discussed plans for a major rally scheduled for June 27th, where he will announce the name of the governing coalition's electoral list and outline his vision for the country's future. He also addressed whether he would run for prime minister in upcoming elections, stating he would reveal this at the rally. Vučić emphasized that elections—either presidential or parliamentary—will occur once the relevant institution decides, likely in October or November. He rejected the idea of resigning as president and immediately taking over as prime minister, stressing the importance of legitimacy through popular support. Analysts suggest parliamentary elections might be more suitable for the current political climate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Vučić's planned announcements and his comments on potential election dates and candidacy. It includes direct quotes from Vučić and mentions analyst opinions but does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral,
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article provides factual information about Vučić's upcoming speech and events without overtly biased language, maintaining a relatively neutral tone.
KurirParty-alignedConservativeFactual 90Objective 5517 days ago Milenko Jovanov after learning about the "sound cannon": Their goal was civil war!Milenko Jovanov, leader of the Serbian Progressive Party, has commented on new findings related to the 'sound cannon' incident during the investigation into the death of a girl at the Faculty of Philosophy. He claims that the goal was to dehumanize President Aleksandar Vučić and incite civil war in Serbia. Jovanov states that the sound cannon was fabricated to provoke a reaction from Brussels and that those involved, including supporters of President Vučić, have spread these lies.
Bias read (Conservative): The article uses strong, emotionally charged language such as 'monstruous deception,' 'dehumanization of President Vučić,' and 'incitement of civil war.' It frames the situation as an intentional conspiracy against the president by his opponents, using loaded terms like 'fabricated' and 'monstrous.'
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 55): The article presents factual details about the investigation and Jovanov's comments but frames the opposition as attempting to start a civil war, showing some bias.
KurirParty-alignedConservativeFactual 90Objective 5017 days ago Ljubičanović: What to expect after that than to say that it is legitimate to take up arms and oppose the authorities of Serbia?The article discusses comments made by attorney Dragoslav Ljubičanović regarding an alleged incident involving Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić. According to the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, documents seized from the Faculty of Philosophy revealed notes from a meeting held on January 22, 2025, mentioning 'a loud cannon' and 'mass response from Brussels.' Ljubičanović stated that by March 15, it was clear such a weapon had not been used. He argued that whoever orchestrated these actions was fully aware of their intentions, aiming to justify the dehumanization of the Serbian government. Ljubičanović criticized claims that Vučić had shot at his people, suggesting this narrative could legitimize armed resistance against Serbian authorities. He described the situation as an organized effort to dehumanize and create a legitimate target out of Serbia’s highest state officials.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a strongly critical perspective toward the Serbian government, implying that claims about President Vučić could incite armed conflict and dehumanization of state institutions. The framing suggests a narrative that challenges the legitimacy of the government and promotes a view对立
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 50): The article presents Dragoslav Ljubičanović's comments objectively but frames the situation as an attempt at destabilization, showing some bias toward Vučić's position.
KurirParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 4517 days ago "MORALS SHOW THAT HE IS A MAN, A MONSTER, A HEADLINE EVIL" Brnabić completely unmasked the campaign against Vučić: People still trusted him and appreciated his effortsAna Brnabić, President of the Serbian Parliament, addressed what she called a false controversy involving 'sound cannon' allegations, describing it as part of a broader campaign against Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić. She criticized past claims that Vučić is a criminal, corrupt, involved in human trafficking, and not ethnically Serbian, noting these were insufficient to undermine his public support. Brnabić argued that people still trusted Vučić due to his efforts in creating jobs, infrastructure, healthcare facilities, and improving wages and pensions. She suggested opponents had to go to
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Ana Brnabić's perspective, which frames the opposition to Aleksandar Vučić as an exaggerated and malicious campaign. The language used by Brnabić—such as calling her opponent a 'monster,' 'ultimate evil,' and 'killer'—suggests strong negative characterization of Vučić’s critics,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 45): The article accurately reports Ana Brnabić's statements about the campaign against Vučić but uses highly charged language calling him a 'monster' and 'killer', showing clear bias.
KurirParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 3521 days ago "We are leaving Vučić to make a top-level evil" Serbian President revealed the real goals of the blockade and everything they are doing, listed the most painful and lowest blows VIDEOThe article quotes Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić discussing what he describes as the goals of his opponents' 'blockade,' which he claims aims to portray him as 'the ultimate evil.' Vučić explains that their strategy includes efforts to criminalize him, deny his achievements, and dehumanize him by spreading false narratives, such as claiming he is not Serbian and that his father is Albanian. He also references a statement suggesting that he 'shot his people in the back,' which he argues would make it impossible for citizens to vote for him.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents Vučić’s perspective without counterpoints or independent verification, using direct quotes that frame his opponents’ actions as an intentional campaign to dehumanize him. The framing emphasizes Vučić’s narrative of being targeted by 'blockaders' who aim to destroy his reputation
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 35): The article accurately reports Vučić's statements but uses strong language labeling opponents as trying to create a 'civil war', showing clear bias.
Večernje novostiParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 80Objective 4017 days ago It was the only way to stop him from talking about the work and the results.The article discusses the campaign of dehumanization against Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, criticizing those who have accused him of various crimes and personal failings over the past decade. It argues that these accusations were insufficient to undermine his credibility and public support, which was based on his perceived efforts and achievements such as creating jobs, building infrastructure, and improving wages and pensions. The article suggests that critics had to escalate their rhetoric by portraying Vučić as a monster willing to harm his own people, including claiming he would 'sho
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on a sports-related event with no significant political implications. The content does not involve political figures, policies, or contentious issues, making it apolitical in nature.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 40): The article accurately quotes Brnabić's statements but uses emotionally charged language describing Vučić as a 'monster' and 'killer', indicating strong bias.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Serbia
