[Video] In Rio, hikers demanded rights for unborn children
In Slovenia, around 200 participants took part in the annual 'March for Life, Family and Croatia' in the city of Rijeka on September 5th. The event, organized under the slogan 'The first step is law! Life is a gift, protect it with a just law!', called for legal protection of human life from conception and changes to the Croatian legislation on abortion. Coordinator Ante Bekavac emphasized the need for lawmakers to listen to the majority of citizens and stated that life begins at conception. Organizers argued that current laws fail to adequately protect human dignity and proposed establishing a social support system for pregnant women and children. They also expressed opposition to what they call 'culture of death', arguing that society often offers termination of pregnancy rather than support for women in difficult circumstances. One participant, Maja Roksandić, shared her experience of adoption and highlighted the joy and meaning of motherhood. Similar marches have taken place in other cities across Croatia.
The Lithuanian parliament has approved a proposal from a citizens' initiative allowing for the termination of pregnancy up to the twelfth week. The decision was made with a large majority. Prince Albert, who holds the right to veto such laws, expressed his stance, emphasizing the need to protect the dignity of unborn children and safeguard families. The Church maintains that the internal dignity of the unborn child should be protected, and that families should be shielded. Currently, Lithuania's law prohibits abortion except in cases of serious danger to the woman’s life or health, when the pregnancy results from a criminal act, or if the mother is under 14 years old. However, the country has not had a maternity ward for several years, forcing women to seek care abroad. A local bishop noted that this situation indicates something is wrong within the nation, as mothers must travel to neighboring countries for childbirth. At the same time, discussions continue regarding the possibility of creating conditions for abortions domestically. The bishop concluded with these words: “I wish for a society in which every child is welcomed and in which every mother and father receives the necessary support to make the right decision for their child. A society that protects life must also be one that does not abandon people in distress.” Mother Terezia asked, “What prevents me from killing you if a mother can kill her own child?” In her speech after receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979, Mother Terezia stated, “The greatest destroyer of peace today is the cry of the innocent unborn child.” She emphasized that it is impossible to build peace among people if a mother can deny her child’s life. “If a mother can kill her own child, what else prevents me from killing you, and you from killing me? There is no longer any barrier between us.” She also stressed that her response to unwanted pregnancies is adoption and fostering, with missionaries of love offering help and seeking homes for children. Meanwhile, in Rijeka, around 200 participants joined the annual March for Life, Family, and Homeland. They demanded legal protection for life from conception and changes to Croatia’s abortion law. The march took place on September 5th, with participants gathering at Jelačić Square before heading towards the Resolutions Square. The event’s slogan was: “The First Step Is Law! Life Is a Gift, We Protect It With Just Laws!” Organizers called on authorities to listen to the majority of citizens and to recognize the sanctity of human life from conception until natural death. Coordinator of the Rijeka march, Ante Bekavac, urged officials not to fear public opinion and to heed the voices of citizens. He argued that life begins at conception and that no one else should decide another person’s right to life. He emphasized the need for a law protecting life throughout its journey and ensuring the inviolable dignity of every individual, regardless of age. Organizers also called for establishing a social support system to assist pregnant women, mothers, and children. Bekavac highlighted the desire to support women facing difficult circumstances and encourage them to choose childbirth. Croatian media reported that organizers requested a change to the law regulating abortion, which has been in effect since 1978. HRT described their call as a demand for a new law better protecting human dignity. One of the other organizers, Ivan Anđelić, explained that the march does not divide people but seeks to unite them. “We are not against anyone, but for everyone, the child, the mother, the father, and the family, and for life worthy of a human being,” he said. Organizers also expressed opposition to what they call a “culture of death.” They believe modern society too often offers women in difficult situations the option of terminating pregnancies instead of providing real support and assistance. “Everyone knows how vulnerable a person is and how hard it is to make decisions under pressure and uncertainty. Therefore, as a society, we are called to offer a hand, not to condemn,” Anđelić added. One of the speakers at the march was Maja Roksandić, a mother of two adopted children. She spoke about her experience with infertility and later adoption, highlighting the joy and meaning that motherhood brought her. According to reports from the Catholic portal IKA, she and her husband initially became foster parents before adopting two children, a boy and a girl. Roksandić expressed gratitude to the biological mothers of her children for choosing to give them life despite difficult circumstances. The march did not proceed without disruptions. On the route and near the gathering site, leftist protesters and supporters of abortion appeared, carrying slogans such as “My body, my choice” and others that were offensive to both the march and the Church. Police were present to monitor the event. According to reports from Riportal, the march proceeded without incidents. This year’s Life March was organized in 19 Croatian cities. Organizers consistently emphasized the need for legal protection of life from conception and greater support for expectant mothers, mothers, and families.
In Slovenia, around 200 participants took part in the annual 'March for Life, Family and Croatia' in the city of Rijeka on September 5th. The event, organized under the slogan 'The first step is law! Life is a gift, protect it with a just law!', called for legal protection of human life from conception and changes to the Croatian legislation on abortion. Coordinator Ante Bekavac emphasized the need for lawmakers to listen to the majority of citizens and stated that life begins at conception. Organizers argued that current laws fail to adequately protect human dignity and proposed establishing a social support system for pregnant women and children. They also expressed opposition to what they call 'culture of death', arguing that society often offers termination of pregnancy rather than support for women in difficult circumstances. One participant, Maja Roksandić, shared her experience of adoption and highlighted the joy and meaning of motherhood. Similar marches have taken place in other cities across Croatia.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the march as a call for legal protection of life from conception, which aligns with conservative values. It emphasizes the importance of legal frameworks protecting human dignity and criticizes existing abortion laws as inadequate. The language used suggests a pro-life stance and抨
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the event accurately, providing details such as the date, location, number of participants, and the organizers' demands for legal protection of life from conception and changes to Croatian legislation on abortion. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the event was or
Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear advocacy tone, using emotionally charged language like 'zaščitimo ga s pravičnim zakonom' (protect it with a fair law) and emphasizing the organizers' calls for legislative action. While it presents facts, it frames the issue in a way that supports the pro-life stance, showin
Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 659/7/2026
The article discusses recent legislative developments in the Principality of Liechtenstein regarding the protection of life during pregnancy. The parliament has approved a proposal allowing termination of pregnancy up to the twelfth week, with exceptions for serious health risks to the mother, sexual offenses leading to conception, or if the child would be born under 14 years old. The article highlights the lack of maternity wards in the country, forcing women to seek care abroad, and mentions the Church's stance on protecting the dignity of the unborn child and supporting families. It also references Saint Teresa of Calcutta, who emphasized the sanctity of life and questioned the morality of mothers ending their own children's lives. The piece includes a quote from a local bishop calling for the creation of conditions for abortion within the country and a reflection on building a society where all children are welcomed and parents receive necessary support.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the debate around the protection of life and the moral implications of abortion, emphasizing the Church's position and referencing Saint Teresa of Calcutta, whose views align with pro-life perspectives. While it presents both the legal changes and the Church's stance, the emphasis
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a legislative decision by the Diet of Liechtenstein regarding the allowance of termination of pregnancy up to twelve weeks, aligning with cross-source consensus. It mentions the current law prohibiting abortion except in specific cases and notes the lack of maternity wards in
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the legislative change and religious perspectives with some emotional weight, particularly through the quote from Saint Teresa of Calcutta. While it provides factual information, the framing leans toward pro-life sentiment, especially in the discussion around protecting unborn l
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.