ON
← Back to feed
Nicola Sturgeon ‘has not spoken to’ estranged husband, Peter Murrell, since he was jailed
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive15 days ago

Nicola Sturgeon ‘has not spoken to’ estranged husband, Peter Murrell, since he was jailed

Former Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has stated she will not speak to or visit her estranged husband, Peter Murrell, who was sentenced to five years in prison for embezzling over £400,000 from the Scottish National Party. During a podcast interview, Sturgeon revealed she had not communicated with Murrell since his sentencing in June and expressed shock upon discovering the extent of his deception. She described feeling foolish for worrying about his wellbeing and mental health during the period leading up to his conviction, noting that he had been isolating himself and withholding information. Murrell used the stolen funds for personal expenses including luxury vehicles, electronics, and high-end kitchenware. Sturgeon denies any knowledge of the embezzlement and has not apologized for her past decisions regarding Murrell's role within the party.

Nicola Sturgeon, the former first minister of Scotland, has confirmed she has not spoken to her estranged husband, Peter Murrell, since he was jailed for embezzling more than £400,000 from the Scottish National Party (SNP). The revelation came during an interview with broadcaster Iain Dale at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, where Sturgeon expressed deep personal turmoil over the betrayal. Murrell, 61, was sentenced to five years in prison in June after pleading guilty to misusing party funds between 2010 and 2022. Sturgeon stated she would not visit him in prison and described herself as a “mug” for having once worried about his well-being and mental health. Murrell’s crimes included using SNP funds to purchase a £124,550 luxury motorhome, a Jaguar SUV, a Volkswagen Golf, and numerous high-end items such as a £3,223 coffee machine, a £3,000 robotic lawn mower, and £2,600 salt and pepper grinders. His largest single purchase, the motorhome, was seized by police three years after it was bought, having been driven just four miles. The SNP wrote off the cost of the vehicle after its accounts were published by the Electoral Commission. Sturgeon denied any knowledge of these actions, stating she had made an error of judgment by retaining Murrell as chief executive when she took leadership of the party in 2014. However, she refused to apologize for his actions and insisted she had never “consciously” seen the motorhome stored at her mother-in-law’s house. Sturgeon revealed she learned of Murrell’s impending guilty plea only a week before he appeared in court on 25 May. She later discovered he had been negotiating his plea for months, a revelation that “hit me like a tonne of bricks.” She said Murrell continued to lie to her even on the day of his sentencing, describing him as “very isolated” and “not communicative” during that period. Sturgeon admitted she had been concerned for his welfare, but now feels foolish for having done so. “He didn’t worry about me. He didn’t worry at all about what he was doing,” she said. “What he has subjected me to is beyond anything I could ever have comprehended.” The couple’s shared Glasgow home was searched as part of Operation Branchform, a police investigation into financial misconduct within the SNP. Murrell’s embezzlement spanned nearly 13 years, with the bulk of the funds being spent in 2020. Sturgeon noted that she had only recently begun to grasp the extent of his deception, saying she had lived with someone she barely knew. “I suddenly realized I had been living with somebody that I never really knew properly,” she said. “That’s something for me to come to terms with, and I don’t think I’m there yet, but also for my family to come to terms with. It’s a really difficult process.” In addition to addressing her marital situation, Sturgeon also commented on recent public criticism from J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series. Rowling had posted on social media calling Sturgeon a “world-class misogynist” and “profoundly disloyal” to her party. Sturgeon responded by claiming that Rowling is “obsessed” with her, noting that she spends far less time thinking about the author than Rowling does about her. The two have clashed over gender issues, particularly regarding Sturgeon’s efforts to reform gender recognition laws in 2022. Sturgeon also criticized former SNP MP Joanna Cherry, whose book was highly critical of her tenure as party leader. She called the book “s***” and challenged Cherry to endure more than 30 seconds of conversation without mentioning her. Sturgeon, who resigned as first minister in March 2023, was briefly arrested in June 2023 but was later cleared of wrongdoing. Her separation from Murrell was announced last year, marking a significant shift in both her personal life and political career. As the fallout from Murrell’s conviction continues, Sturgeon remains focused on reconciling with her past and moving forward.

3 reports

BBC News (UK) logoBBC News (UK)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 7515 days ago
Sturgeon hasn't spoken to Murrell since he was jailed for embezzling SNP funds

Former Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon stated she has not spoken to her estranged husband, Peter Murrell, since he was jailed for embezzling over £400,000 from the Scottish National Party (SNP). Murrell, who served as the SNP’s chief executive, used party funds to purchase luxury items such as a £124,550 motorhome and various high-end gadgets. Sturgeon expressed feelings of betrayal and confusion, stating she only learned about the extent of Murrell’s actions when he pleaded guilty in court. She confirmed she would not visit him in prison and described feeling 'like a mug' for still caring about him. The case involved a detailed investigation into financial misconduct within the SNP, including searches of their shared home and the party’s headquarters.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Sturgeon's statements and the details of Murrell's embezzlement without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Sturgeon and provides factual information about the financial misconduct, without apparent bias toward her or Murrell.

Why factuality (85): The article reports statements from Nicola Sturgeon regarding her estranged husband Peter Murrell, including her refusal to visit him in prison and her claim of ignorance regarding his embezzlement. These claims align with the cross-source consensus among BBC, The Guardian, and The Independent. The

Why objectivity (75): The article presents Sturgeon's personal account of her relationship with Murrell and includes emotionally charged language such as 'mug' and references to her feelings of betrayal. While it provides factual information, it frames the situation through Sturgeon's perspective, potentially influencing

The Guardian (UK) logoThe Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7515 days ago
Nicola Sturgeon ‘has not spoken to’ estranged husband, Peter Murrell, since he was jailed

Former Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has stated she will not speak to or visit her estranged husband, Peter Murrell, who was sentenced to five years in prison for embezzling over £400,000 from the Scottish National Party. During a podcast interview, Sturgeon revealed she had not communicated with Murrell since his sentencing in June and expressed shock upon discovering the extent of his deception. She described feeling foolish for worrying about his wellbeing and mental health during the period leading up to his conviction, noting that he had been isolating himself and withholding information. Murrell used the stolen funds for personal expenses including luxury vehicles, electronics, and high-end kitchenware. Sturgeon denies any knowledge of the embezzlement and has not apologized for her past decisions regarding Murrell's role within the party.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Sturgeon's public statements and Murrell's legal situation without overtly favoring either side. While the subject involves a prominent political figure and her spouse, the reporting focuses on factual disclosures rather than taking a clear ideological slan

Why factuality (85): This article confirms the same facts as the BBC report, including Sturgeon's refusal to speak to or visit Murrell, her discovery of his embezzlement, and the sentencing details. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and accurately reflects the public statements made by Sturgeon. No new or confli

Why objectivity (75): The article uses emotive language such as 'tonne of bricks' and emphasizes Sturgeon's feelings of being a 'mug,' which may sway the reader's interpretation. While factual, the narrative leans into the emotional impact of the situation rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentProgressiveFactual 60Objective 6015 days ago
Nicola Sturgeon claims Harry Potter author JK Rowling is ‘obsessed’ with her

Former Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon accused Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling of being 'obsessed' with her, responding to Rowling's criticism of her as a 'world-class misogynist' and 'profoundly disloyal.' Sturgeon highlighted their disagreements on gender recognition laws and transgender rights, suggesting Rowling's focus on her is disproportionate. She also criticized former SNP MP Joanna Cherry for publishing a book critical of her leadership, calling it 's***' and mocking Cherry's alleged fixation on her. Additionally, Sturgeon discussed her estranged husband Peter Murrell, who was jailed for financial misconduct, noting she had not spoken to him since his sentencing.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Nicola Sturgeon as a victim of unwarranted personal attacks, emphasizing her responses to critics rather than presenting balanced perspectives. The language used ('obsessed,' 'world-class misogynist') reflects a left-leaning critique of conservative viewpoints, especially around性别

Why factuality (60): This article diverges significantly from the previous two, focusing on a completely different topic - Sturgeon's comments about JK Rowling. It contains incomplete sentences and appears to be cut off mid-article. As such, it cannot be reliably assessed for factual accuracy relative to the main event

Why objectivity (60): The article introduces a new subject unrelated to the main event discussed in the other articles. This lack of focus and coherence affects its objectivity score. The tone remains neutral, but the content is not relevant to the main event being evaluated.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories