Northern Ireland’s agriculture minister, Andrew Muir, has revealed he received a death threat following the controversial culling of 51 cows in County Tyrone. The incident, which sparked widespread outrage, occurred after a man was convicted of multiple offenses and permanently banned from keeping animals. The culling, conducted by the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera), drew sharp criticism from politicians, farmers, and the public alike. An emergency session of Stormont’s Agriculture Committee was convened to address the fallout from the cull. During the meeting, Muir stated that misinformation had circulated suggesting he had sanctioned or ordered the culling. He confirmed that he had discussed the death threat with the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) and noted that other officials within his department had begun considering security measures and personal safety precautions. Muir described the conditions on the affected farm during welfare inspections conducted between 2022 and 2024 as “grotesque.” He recalled seeing images of emaciated animals that left a lasting impression on him. According to Muir, the animals suffered from severe malnutrition, with limited access to clean food and water. Any available feed was contaminated with urine and dung, leading to unnecessary suffering among the livestock. Approximately 33 animal carcasses and bones were discovered on-site. The culling was mandated by a court order after the man was disqualified from keeping animals for life. Initially, the department attempted to facilitate the transfer of the animals through a voluntary process, offering assistance to the owner to sell or relocate the stock. However, after minimal progress, the department was compelled to proceed with the cull under the legal directive. The method and location of the culling became a focal point of controversy. Local Sinn Féin councillor Eugene McConnell criticized the operation as resembling a “wild west scene,” while DUP MLA Deborah Erskine mentioned that a father and son had witnessed the culling taking place in broad daylight. Muir explained that the culling took place at three different locations, with only one site raising concerns regarding public visibility. According to Muir, efforts were made to minimize public exposure before the culling commenced. At one of the sites, a potential buyer showed interest in purchasing some of the cattle, prompting the culling to be paused temporarily. However, attempts to gather the animals resulted in them being released onto a public road. To ensure public safety, department staff, alongside local farmers, intervened to move the animals off the road before proceeding with the humane euthanasia. Despite these explanations, the operation faced significant backlash. Concerns were raised about the perceived brutality of the culling, with some claiming the approach was overly harsh. In response, Muir emphasized that the decision to cull was based on professional judgment from veterinary officials, who deemed it the only viable option. He reiterated that there was “no reasonable alternative” available at the time. The controversy surrounding the culling prompted Muir to announce an external review into the circumstances. This followed mounting pressure from various quarters, including political figures and members of the farming community. DUP deputy leader Michelle McIlveen expressed concern over the loss of public trust in the department regarding animal welfare matters, noting that the incident had generated considerable anger among farmers. Muir condemned the wave of misogynistic, sectarian, and homophobic abuse directed toward himself and his colleagues, calling it “despicable and deeply concerning.” He stressed that receiving a death threat was “nothing short of a disgrace” and highlighted the unacceptable nature of such threats. As the investigation unfolds, the focus remains on addressing the concerns raised by the public and ensuring transparency in future operations involving animal welfare.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter