ON
← Back to feed
NGO: Two women sentenced to death in Iran for protesting
Austria🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

NGO: Two women sentenced to death in Iran for protesting

Two women in Iran have been sentenced to death for their involvement in government-critical protests in January, according to reports by the Norwegian-based human rights organization Iran Human Rights (IHR) and the U.S.-based human rights group HRANA. The first case involves 20-year-old Taraneh Rahimi, who was convicted alongside nine men for incidents in Isfahan where two people were killed, including a security force member. Her sister Romina received up to 36 years in prison. HRANA criticized the lack of access to legal documents and insufficient time for defense preparation. In another case, 43-year-old Leila Abolhasani, mother of two children, was convicted of arson during the protests, though her family denied the allegations, claiming she had merely filmed the incident. Iran Human Rights noted that no woman has yet been executed in connection with these protests, while 29 men have been executed, and 16 Iranian women were executed this year for other charges.

U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly blamed the Iranian people for his failure in the ongoing conflict with Iran, expressing frustration over their lack of uprising against the regime. This statement comes amid reports of increasing executions in Iran linked to protests that erupted in January 2026. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, at least 27 individuals had been executed by early August, with the number continuing to rise since then. Trump’s comments suggest he believes the Iranian regime is too weak to continue suppressing dissent, though evidence contradicts this view. The situation escalated after Trump initially promised support to protesters during the demonstrations, seemingly prepared with military plans. He later became more explicit, stating that once U.S. operations were complete, Iranians should take control of their government. However, five weeks into the conflict, the U.S. was far from concluding its mission, prompting Trump to threaten to “wipe out” Iran’s civilization. Now, as the second half of the war begins, Trump posted on his social media platform, “Truth Social,” questioning why the Iranian people have not risen up and fought back. The U.S. strategy involves both economic sanctions and military strikes targeting infrastructure, which have affected both the regime and civilians. Critics argue that such tactics aim to weaken the population until they can no longer resist. Historical precedents show that regimes typically collapse when they lack the strength to suppress opposition. However, there is currently no indication that Iran’s leadership is losing its grip, despite internal pragmatists who might advocate for change. According to the organization Iran Human Rights (IHR), based in Norway, two women have been sentenced to death in connection with the January protests. The first case involves Taraneh Rahimi, a 20-year-old woman who, along with nine men, was convicted for incidents in Isfahan where two people were killed, including a security force member. Her sister, Romina, received a maximum prison sentence of 36 years. The Human Rights News Agency (HRANA) noted that defense attorneys faced challenges accessing case files and lacked sufficient time to review documents and evidence. In another case, Leila Abolhasani, a 43-year-old mother of two teenagers, was sentenced to death in Isfahan for allegedly setting fire to a shop during the protests. Her family denied the allegations, stating she merely filmed the incident. IHR reported that no women had been executed in relation to the protests thus far, while 29 men had been executed for participating in demonstrations. Additionally, 16 women were executed this year for other charges unrelated to the protests. The legal proceedings have drawn criticism for procedural irregularities, with defense lawyers reporting limited access to information and insufficient time to prepare their cases. Family members of the accused have consistently denied the charges, highlighting concerns about due process and fair trial rights. These developments underscore the complex and often contentious nature of justice within Iran’s current political landscape.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

ORF News logoORF NewsState / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 758/31/2026
NGO: Two women sentenced to death in Iran for protesting

Two women in Iran have been sentenced to death for their involvement in government-critical protests in January, according to reports by the Norwegian-based human rights organization Iran Human Rights (IHR) and the U.S.-based human rights group HRANA. The first case involves 20-year-old Taraneh Rahimi, who was convicted alongside nine men for incidents in Isfahan where two people were killed, including a security force member. Her sister Romina received up to 36 years in prison. HRANA criticized the lack of access to legal documents and insufficient time for defense preparation. In another case, 43-year-old Leila Abolhasani, mother of two children, was convicted of arson during the protests, though her family denied the allegations, claiming she had merely filmed the incident. Iran Human Rights noted that no woman has yet been executed in connection with these protests, while 29 men have been executed, and 16 Iranian women were executed this year for other charges.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights the harsh sentencing of women involved in protests, which aligns with a critical stance toward the Iranian government's treatment of dissenters. The emphasis on the disproportionate number of male executions compared to female executions suggests a concern for gender-based ine

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about two women being sentenced to death by Iranian authorities for participating in protests, citing sources like Iran Human Rights (IHR) and HRANA. These organizations are known for monitoring human rights in Iran, and the information aligns with the general c

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts in a relatively neutral manner but includes some interpretive statements such as 'the Todesmaschinerie läuft' (the death machine is running), which introduces a degree of emotional language. The tone is generally objective but slightly critical of the Iranian regime.

Der Standard logoDer StandardIndependentConservativeFactual 70Objective 509/2/2026
Trump blames Iranian people for his failure

The article discusses U.S. President Donald Trump's frustration over the Iranian people not rising up against their regime during protests in January 2026. It notes that at least 27 individuals were executed by the Iranian authorities following the protests, according to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. The article critiques Trump’s rhetoric, including his promise of military support and later threats to 'erase' Iranian civilization if the U.S. was not successful in its objectives. It argues that Trump's approach, which includes economic sanctions and attacks on infrastructure, aims to pressure the Iranian population into rebellion, but questions whether this strategy will succeed given the regime's continued suppression of dissent.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Trump's actions and rhetoric in a manner that aligns with conservative or right-leaning perspectives. It emphasizes Trump's aggressive stance toward Iran, portraying his policies as necessary measures to provoke change, while downplaying the human rights concerns associated with伊朗

Why factuality (70): The article mentions the death sentences and references the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights reporting at least 27 executions by early August. It also cites the number of men executed since January 2026. However, these figures are not independently verified, and the article does not provide dir

Why objectivity (50): The article has a clear bias towards criticizing the Iranian government and President Trump. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'Todesmaschinerie läuft' and 'kontrafaktischen Namen' (contradictory name) when referring to Trump’s platform. The tone is highly opinionated and frames the situa

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories