Almost 1000 NSW teachers were asked if screens helped students learn. Only 53 per cent said yes
A study commissioned by the New South Wales (NSW) government found that screen use among students increases significantly as they progress through school, with high school students spending over seven hours daily on screens for academic, social, and recreational purposes. The research surveyed 900 teachers, 1000 students, and 1600 parents, revealing that only 53% of teachers believed screens helped students learn. Teachers reported frequent distractions caused by screens, with just 42% believing students could refocus when asked. The NSW government recently imposed a cap on screen time in schools, limiting it to 15 minutes per day for younger students, a reversal of previous policies promoting greater technology integration. The report highlights concerns about students' ability to self-regulate screen use and the negative effects on focus and peer interaction.
Almost 1000 NSW teachers were asked if screens helped students learn. Only 53 per cent said yes. A recent study commissioned by the NSW government highlights concerns over students' ability to manage their screen use, both inside and outside the classroom. The research, led by Macquarie University, found that students increasingly struggle with distractions caused by digital devices as they progress through their schooling. The study indicates that screen time significantly increases once students enter high school, with pupils spending over seven hours daily on screens for schoolwork, social media, and gaming. In response to these findings, the NSW government has implemented a policy capping screen time in schools to as little as 15 minutes a day for the youngest students. This marks a notable departure from past policies aimed at integrating more technology into classrooms to enhance digital literacy and prepare students for the future. According to the report, titled Best Practice in Screen Use for Education, surveys were conducted with 900 teachers, 1000 students, and 1600 parents. It found that half of the teachers reported students were frequently distracted during class, while only 42 per cent felt students could shift their attention away from screens when required. High school leaders expressed particular concern, with only 10 per cent believing students could effectively self-regulate their technology use during learning sessions. NSW Education Minister Prue Car stated that the decision to limit screen time was influenced by concerns regarding the impact of excessive technology use on children's mental health and education. She emphasized that students can benefit from screens and technology when used intentionally and appropriately for educational purposes. The research revealed that screen time surges once students begin secondary school, increasing from under two hours a day in early primary school to over seven hours in high school, encompassing both in-school and out-of-school activities. Secondary students reported spending an average of 38 minutes per day on social media outside of school, rising to 61 minutes for those in years 11 and 12. As students grow older, they are more likely to report spending excessive time on screens. However, only 59 per cent of secondary students claimed they would always stop using screens immediately upon request. Additionally, 80 per cent of primary and 82 per cent of secondary students noted that their parents were often on screens when they attempted to communicate with them. While students acknowledged the potential benefits of screen use in the classroom, 84 per cent of high school students and 57 per cent of primary students also indicated they were sometimes distracted when using screens. When questioned about whether digital devices aided learning, 53 per cent of teachers agreed, 27 per cent remained neutral, and 20 per cent disagreed. The report highlighted a clear trend in students' screen use throughout their schooling: increased device time, more complex activity mixes, and blurred lines between learning, leisure, and social connections. It noted that 68 per cent of students in kindergarten to year 2 used screens for learning on the previous school day. Professor Matt Bower, lead author of the research, remarked that since the Rudd government's Digital Education Revolution nearly 20 years ago, educators have realized that merely placing technology in classrooms does not necessarily improve learning outcomes. He suggested that initial assumptions about the benefits of technology in education were overly simplistic.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
A study commissioned by the NSW government found that over 900 teachers, 1000 students, and 1600 parents were surveyed regarding screen use in education. The research revealed that screen time increases significantly as students progress through school, with high school students spending over seven hours daily on screens for schoolwork, social media, and gaming. Teachers reported frequent student distractions, with only 53% believing screens helped learning. The NSW government recently imposed a cap on screen time in schools, limiting it to 15 minutes per day for young students, marking a reversal from previous policies promoting increased technology integration. The report highlights concerns about students' ability to self-regulate screen use and the negative effects on focus and peer interaction.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a growing concern about the negative impact of screen time on students' academic performance and mental health, aligning with progressive views that emphasize reducing technology use in education. It highlights the government's recent policy change to limit screen use
Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the first in content and sources, accurately reflecting the research findings and policy changes. It provides the same statistics and references the same report. The factuality score remains high due to consistency with other sources and no apparent fabrication of data.
Why objectivity (75): Similar to the first article, this piece uses quotes from the Education Minister that present a perspective favoring reduced screen time, introducing a subtle bias toward caution about technology's role in education.
A study commissioned by the New South Wales (NSW) government found that screen use among students increases significantly as they progress through school, with high school students spending over seven hours daily on screens for academic, social, and recreational purposes. The research surveyed 900 teachers, 1000 students, and 1600 parents, revealing that only 53% of teachers believed screens helped students learn. Teachers reported frequent distractions caused by screens, with just 42% believing students could refocus when asked. The NSW government recently imposed a cap on screen time in schools, limiting it to 15 minutes per day for younger students, a reversal of previous policies promoting greater technology integration. The report highlights concerns about students' ability to self-regulate screen use and the negative effects on focus and peer interaction.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a growing concern about the negative impact of screen use on students' focus and mental health, aligning with progressive views that emphasize reducing technology dependence in education. It highlights the NSW government's recent policy change to limit screen time, a左
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the findings of the Macquarie University-led research, including the percentage of teachers who believe screens help students learn, the increase in screen use among older students, and the policy changes by the NSW government. It aligns with the cross-source consensus
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the findings in a balanced manner but includes quotes from the NSW Education Minister that frame the issue in terms of concern over screen use and mental health, which introduces a slight editorial tilt towards caution regarding technology in education.
The Conversation (AU)IndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 70yesterday
A recent study commissioned by the New South Wales Department of Education explored the actual usage of screens in Australian classrooms through surveys of over 3,000 participants including students, teachers, and parents. The findings reveal that while many parents support the use of digital devices for learning, especially in high school, opinions vary regarding appropriate screen time limits. Teachers commonly use screens for research, instruction, writing, practice, and organization, with younger students relying more on literacy and numeracy apps, while older students engage in document creation and communication tools. The study highlights that the current use of screens in education differs from common assumptions and underscores the importance of balancing digital skills with concerns about excessive screen exposure.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the debate around screen use in schools, incorporating perspectives from parents, teachers, and students without overtly favoring any side. It discusses both the arguments for and against screen use in education and provides data from a comprehensive study
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents multiple perspectives (e.g., parents' views, researchers' arguments), it leans toward highlighting the debate and the call for evidence, which can be seen as subtly supporting the idea that current practices may not be optimal. This introduces a mild editorial slant.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Australia
