One of the world's strongest meteors has been recorded in Croatia
The article explains the phenomenon of meteocunamis, which are rare but dangerous atmospheric-induced sea waves. It describes how a strong storm on Wednesday evening caused one of the strongest meteocunamis recorded in history along the eastern Adriatic coast, particularly affecting the area around Stari Grad on Hvar, where a 30 cm high tide was observed. The article outlines the scientific causes of meteocunamis, including atmospheric pressure changes, gravity waves, and resonance effects. It notes that while these events are less frequent than seismic tsunamis, they can still cause significant damage, citing historical examples such as the devastating wave in Veli Losinj, Croatia, in June 1978, which reached up to six meters in height and caused millions in damages.
A powerful wave, known as a meteocunami, struck parts of the eastern Adriatic coast on Wednesday evening, causing significant flooding in areas such as Stari Grad on Hvar and parts of Mali Lošinj. The phenomenon, which is rare but potentially dangerous, was triggered by atmospheric conditions rather than seismic activity, according to reports from Croatian institutions. This event marks one of the strongest recorded meteocunamis in history, with water levels rising rapidly and submerging coastal areas within seconds. The incident occurred during a severe storm that swept through the northern and central Adriatic Sea. On Hvar, the waters surged approximately 30 centimeters high, inundating restaurants and cafes. Witnesses described the suddenness of the event, noting how the sea quickly covered the land before retreating. Similar occurrences were reported in other coastal towns, including Pula and Zadar, where the tide rose and fell dramatically, leaving boats stranded on dry ground. Meteocunamis are long, tsunami-like waves caused by atmospheric influences such as sudden changes in air pressure, atmospheric gravity waves, weather fronts, and storm surges. These phenomena are distinct from seismic tsunamis, which result from underwater earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, or landslides. Instead, they arise from interactions between the atmosphere and the ocean, often involving complex processes of energy transfer and resonance. Two key types of resonance play a role in the formation of meteocunamis: Proudman resonance and harbor resonance. Proudman resonance occurs when the speed of an atmospheric disturbance matches the speed of long ocean waves. Harbor resonance happens when the frequency of incoming waves aligns with the natural oscillation frequency of a specific coastal area. These resonances can amplify the effects of atmospheric disturbances, leading to significant wave action in vulnerable locations. Atmospheric gravity waves form at the boundary between stable and unstable layers of the atmosphere. These waves cause fluctuations in surface air pressure, generating long ocean waves that can intensify due to additional factors such as resonance and shoaling near continental shelves. Waves generated this way can travel great distances and reach coastal areas with considerable force, sometimes more than ten times their initial strength before impacting the shore. Historically, destructive meteocunamis have been recorded in various regions, including Japan, China, Spain, and large lakes in North America and the east coast of the United States. The eastern Adriatic coast, particularly the island of Korčula, has experienced notable incidents. One of the most severe occurred on June 21, 1978, when a series of waves up to six meters high flooded the town of Veli Luk, resulting in damages estimated at around seven million US dollars, about 6.1 million euros at the time. This event remains among the strongest documented meteocunamis globally. In recent weeks, similar events have been observed along the Croatian coastline. In Mali Lošinj, tourists and residents were caught off guard as the sea rapidly submerged the waterfront, creating panic. Local authorities noted that while the occurrence surprised visitors, it was familiar to locals who had grown accustomed to such sudden changes. A spokesperson for the city stated that there were currently no official reports of damage, though the visual impact left many shaken. In Zadar, the sea initially rose over 30 centimeters above normal levels before suddenly dropping by nearly 60 centimeters, exposing the seabed. Boats were left stranded, and visitors fled in alarm as the water reached their knees. As the tide receded, vessels returned to the water, revealing the extent of the temporary submersion. These recent events highlight the unpredictable nature of meteocunamis and the need for continued monitoring and public awareness. While they are less frequent than seismic tsunamis, their potential for rapid onset and localized impact makes them a growing concern for coastal communities. Scientists continue to study these phenomena to better understand their triggers and improve early warning systems.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article explains the phenomenon of meteocunamis, which are rare but dangerous atmospheric-induced sea waves. It describes how a strong storm on Wednesday evening caused one of the strongest meteocunamis recorded in history along the eastern Adriatic coast, particularly affecting the area around Stari Grad on Hvar, where a 30 cm high tide was observed. The article outlines the scientific causes of meteocunamis, including atmospheric pressure changes, gravity waves, and resonance effects. It notes that while these events are less frequent than seismic tsunamis, they can still cause significant damage, citing historical examples such as the devastating wave in Veli Losinj, Croatia, in June 1978, which reached up to six meters in height and caused millions in damages.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a purely scientific explanation of meteocunamis without any political commentary, bias, or advocacy. It focuses on natural phenomena, their causes, and historical impacts, maintaining a neutral tone throughout.
Why factuality (90): This article provides a detailed explanation of how meteotsunamis form, referencing the primary source document accurately. It mentions the event in Croatia and links it to historical records, showing good alignment with the source material. It also includes information about the Institute’s researc
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone when discussing the science behind meteotsunamis. However, there is some minor editorializing in the description of the event, particularly in the visual representation of the phenomenon, which could be seen as slightly biased towards dramatic effect.
Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 757 days ago
A short-lived coastal flooding event occurred in the center of Mali Lošinj, causing panic among tourists who had not experienced such an occurrence before. The water level rose extremely quickly, inundating restaurants and cafes within seconds. Witnesses described the sudden surge of seawater, leading to chaos as people fled the area. Local authorities stated they currently lack damage data but noted that residents are accustomed to such occurrences due to 'meteocunamis'—sudden changes in sea levels caused by atmospheric pressure shifts. Similar incidents were reported recently in other coastal towns like Pula and Zadar, where sea levels fluctuated dramatically, prompting similar reactions from visitors.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a natural phenomenon without overt ideological framing. It reports on the incident, quotes witnesses and local representatives neutrally, and provides scientific explanation without taking sides. While the topic relates to coastal management and disaster res
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a local incident at Mali Lošinj where water quickly flooded the shore, causing panic among tourists. It references the phenomenon of meteotsunamis and quotes locals and officials. While it aligns with the primary source document regarding the cause and general nature of meteot
Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat sensational, emphasizing the panic and chaos experienced by tourists. The article uses emotionally charged language like 'panika' and describes events in a way that highlights the fear and confusion, which may not be entirely objective.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.