Netanyahu selectively investigates security leaks for his own political gain, NYT reporter alleges

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is accused of using selective security leak investigations to serve his political agenda, according to allegations made by journalist Ronen Bergman during an interview with 103FM on July 14, 2026. Bergman claimed that Netanyahu exploits the legal framework to pursue cases involving leaks that damage his political standing while allowing classified information favorable to his position to be disclosed. During the interview, Bergman discussed a recent New York Times report alleging that the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad had attempted to recruit former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. When asked whether publishing such details served Israel's national security interests, Bergman noted that the report was based on sources in Europe, Iran, and America. He stated that these materials were being published as part of the broader coverage of the issue. Bergman also mentioned that the report had been submitted to the censorship authorities, which had approved its release. Bergman defended the publication of intelligence-related reports, emphasizing the role of the media in exposing hidden aspects of government operations. He argued that the current situation involves a failure within the military, intelligence, and political spheres. According to Bergman, the press must illuminate the darker corners of affairs and question how such situations arise. He further criticized the high volume of alleged security leaks emanating from the Prime Minister’s Office. Bergman pointed out that the same entity responsible for leaking information is also ordering investigations into those leaks. He suggested that Netanyahu or his representatives frequently release classified information deemed sensitive. Bergman rejected claims that Netanyahu holds the legal authority to declassify information independently. He argued that Netanyahu has assumed a power he does not possess under the law. Bergman likened this to the mythical philosopher’s stone, suggesting that Netanyahu believes he can transform classified documents into non-classified ones with ease. This, he emphasized, is illegal. Bergman also alleged that there are attempts to intimidate journalists and prevent them from performing their duties. He warned that such actions could deter journalists from publishing information that contradicts the prime minister's wishes. Bergman cited examples, including a report by Channel 12 regarding classified information that was never aired, while Channel 14 regularly published substantial amounts of data. He highlighted the case of Yaakov Bardugo, who allegedly revealed the date of a strike in Iran. In conclusion, Bergman asserted that there is no genuine intent to investigate leaks. Instead, he claimed that Netanyahu seeks to utilize the security and law enforcement systems to suppress information that challenges his narrative. This, he argued, reflects a political strategy aimed at controlling the flow of information.