ON
← Back to feed
Supreme Court rejects appeal over Likud regional slots, backs party court ruling
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenter19 days ago

Supreme Court rejects appeal over Likud regional slots, backs party court ruling

The Israeli Supreme Court rejected a petition challenging the Likud party's internal court decision that overturned a vote allowing sitting members of Knesset, ministers, and deputy ministers to run for regional slots on the party's Knesset list. The petition was filed by MK Afif Abed but withdrawn after indications the court might reject it. During the hearing, justices criticized bringing the internal party dispute to the High Court of Justice, emphasizing that the Likud party court was the appropriate body to handle such matters. Justice Ofer Grosskopf stated there were no grounds for judicial intervention, noting the District Court had already found no issue with the Likud court's decision. Justice Daphne Barak Erez also dismissed the argument, asserting the District Court did not find the Likud court exceeded its authority.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party faces mounting pressure to resolve internal disputes over its upcoming primary election, which will determine the composition of its Knesset list ahead of the October 27 general election. With tensions rising over the allocation of reserved positions and the influence of Netanyahu himself, the party finds itself at a critical juncture as it prepares to select candidates for the next legislative term. The primary, set for Monday, is being viewed as a pivotal moment for the governing party, which holds 32 seats in the current Knesset and leads the government. The controversy centers around the distribution of reserved spots, which Netanyahu has secured for eight of his chosen candidates. These positions, placed among the top 29 on the list, grant him unprecedented control over the party’s electoral slate. Alongside these reserved slots, the party’s central committee has already allocated guaranteed positions to key figures such as Defense Minister Israel Katz, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, and Likud Central Committee chairman Haim Katz. These moves have sparked debate within the party, with critics arguing that they diminish the democratic nature of the primary process. The dispute over the reserved positions follows an earlier attempt to establish an emergency mechanism allowing a committee of Likud mayors to decide the party list if security conditions made holding a primary impossible. However, the party tribunal ruled that the primary must proceed regardless of external factors. Despite this, the primary remains a crucial element in shaping the party’s future direction, with members expected to play a significant role in determining the final list. The internal dynamics of the party are further complicated by the presence of both established lawmakers and emerging candidates vying for limited spots. Many current MKs are unlikely to secure a place in the next Knesset due to the reduced number of open positions. This situation has intensified competition, with party members juggling the desire for individual recognition against the need to maintain a cohesive and electorally viable platform. Public opinion suggests that the Likud is facing challenges in maintaining its dominance in the upcoming election. Polls indicate that the party is projected to win between 22 and 24 seats, a decline from its current 32. This forecast has prompted Netanyahu to take decisive steps to influence the outcome, including supporting candidates aligned with his vision for the party. One such candidate is former Otzma Yehudit MK Almog Cohen, who received public endorsement from the prime minister. The selection of Oren Dobronsky, a businessman and co-founder of the tech firm Hotbar, for one of Netanyahu’s reserved slots has drawn attention. Dobronsky, known for his work in the American tech industry, faced criticism after a past comment referring to U.S. President Donald Trump as a “piece of s***.” In response to backlash, Dobronsky issued an apology, stating that his remarks were made in a moment of frustration and that he deeply respects Trump. As the primary approaches, the focus remains on how the party will balance internal governance with the broader political landscape. The outcome of the vote will not only determine the makeup of the Knesset list but also provide insights into the direction of the Likud under Netanyahu’s leadership. With the general election less than two months away, the stakes are high for the party that continues to wield significant influence in Israeli politics.

1 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8019 days ago
Supreme Court rejects appeal over Likud regional slots, backs party court ruling

The Israeli Supreme Court rejected a petition challenging the Likud party's internal court decision that overturned a vote allowing sitting members of Knesset, ministers, and deputy ministers to run for regional slots on the party's Knesset list. The petition was filed by MK Afif Abed but withdrawn after indications the court might reject it. During the hearing, justices criticized bringing the internal party dispute to the High Court of Justice, emphasizing that the Likud party court was the appropriate body to handle such matters. Justice Ofer Grosskopf stated there were no grounds for judicial intervention, noting the District Court had already found no issue with the Likud court's decision. Justice Daphne Barak Erez also dismissed the argument, asserting the District Court did not find the Likud court exceeded its authority.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive matter involving the Likud party and judicial oversight, the framing remains balanced. The justices' statements reflect their legal reasoning rather than overt ideological slant. The article presents both sides of the argument, Abed's legal claim vs

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a Supreme Court decision rejecting an appeal related to Likud party internal elections. It cites specific justices and quotes them directly, aligning with typical reporting on legal matters. While no primary source is available, the information appears consistent with known pr

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting both sides of the argument as they relate to the court's decision. However, the article emphasizes the court's rejection of the appeal and includes direct quotes from justices, which may slightly lean toward portraying the court's stance as correct. There is no o

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories