ON
← Back to feed
Netanyahu’s aides accused of leaking classified intel to Qatar for anti-Egypt push
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenter12 days ago

Netanyahu’s aides accused of leaking classified intel to Qatar for anti-Egypt push

Israeli media outlet Israel Hayom reported that three senior advisors to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Jonatan Urich, Yisrael Einhorn, and Eli Feldstein, allegedly leaked classified information about Israeli concerns regarding Egypt to Qatar. The leaks, according to the report, were part of a strategy by Qatar to undermine Egypt's position in hostage negotiations with Hamas. The information was obtained during classified discussions in March-May 2024 involving Netanyahu, the National Security Council, the IDF, and Shin Bet, focusing on Egypt's compliance with the 1979 peace agreement. The report claims that the leaks led to articles in the Israeli press questioning Egypt's adherence to the agreement. All three advisors are under investigation in the 'Qatargate' scandal, which includes allegations of corruption and contact with foreign agents. Urich and Feldstein have been arrested, while Einhorn, currently in Serbia, was recently questioned by Israeli authorities. Defense officials expressed concern that the leaks could jeopardize the peace agreement with Egypt and hinder efforts to secure the release of hostages held by Hamas. Einhorn's lawyer has dismissed the report as false.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s senior aides are facing serious allegations of leaking classified intelligence to Qatar as part of an effort to undermine Egypt’s role in negotiations with Hamas over the release of Israeli hostages captured during the October 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel. According to reports from Israel Hayom, three advisors, Jonatan Urich, Yisrael Einhorn, and Eli Feldstein, are suspected of passing sensitive information to Qatari officials while on the Gulf nation’s payroll. This information was later shared with Israeli journalists, aiming to shift public perception away from Egypt and toward Qatar as the preferred mediator in the ongoing conflict with Hamas. The alleged leaks originated from confidential discussions held between March and May 2024, involving Netanyahu, the National Security Council, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), and the Shin Bet. These meetings focused on assessing Israel-Egypt relations and whether Egypt had violated the 1979 peace agreement by sending troops into the Sinai Peninsula. Reports of these supposed violations began appearing in Israeli media in late 2024 and early 2025, raising questions about the credibility of such claims and their potential impact on diplomatic efforts. The accusations add a new layer of complexity to the ongoing Qatargate investigation, which centers on allegations that Urich, Einhorn, and Feldstein engaged in pro-Qatar lobbying activities while serving as Netanyahu’s advisors. Investigators have long suspected that the trio received information from Qatar and disseminated it to Israeli media. However, recent developments suggest that the exchange of information was mutual, with Israeli officials potentially sharing classified data with Qatari representatives. Urich and Feldstein have both been arrested and questioned in connection with the case. Einhorn, currently residing in Serbia, has avoided returning to Israel, fearing arrest. He was recently interviewed by Israeli investigators in Belgrade after refusing to come back to the country. Both Urich and Feldstein have denied the allegations, with Urich calling the reports a fabrication by political rivals seeking to undermine Netanyahu ahead of the October 27 election. Defense officials expressed concern that the leaks could jeopardize the peace agreement with Egypt and diminish Cairo’s willingness to assist in freeing the remaining hostages held by Hamas. A security official who attended the classified meetings confirmed the details of the leaks, noting that the timing of the disclosures aligned with the sequence of events described in the report. The controversy has drawn sharp criticism from Netanyahu’s political opponents, who accuse him of endangering national security by allowing his aides to engage in activities that benefit Qatar at the expense of Israel’s strategic relationships. Left-wing politician Yair Golan condemned the actions as “treason,” arguing that the aides’ financial ties to Qatar compromised Israel’s position in the region. Meanwhile, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara is expected to soon decide whether to charge Urich and Feldstein with national security offenses related to their alleged contact with a foreign agent. A former senior Mossad official is also under consideration for similar charges, pending a formal review. The Shin Bet and Mossad have yet to finalize their assessments, but Justice Ministry officials have indicated that there is sufficient evidence to proceed with legal action. The situation has also raised concerns about potential foreign interference in Israel’s upcoming election. The head of the Shin Bet, David Zini, has warned about possible influence operations by Russia, China, and Iran, though the extent of such interference remains unclear. With polls indicating that Netanyahu’s coalition faces challenges, speculation continues about how external actors might seek to sway public opinion or disrupt the electoral process. As the investigation unfolds, the implications for Israel’s diplomatic relations and internal politics remain uncertain. The allegations against Netanyahu’s aides highlight the complex interplay between national security, foreign policy, and domestic power struggles, setting the stage for further scrutiny and debate in the coming months.

3 reports

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7512 days ago
Report: AG expected to charge Netanyahu aides with security offenses in Qatargate affair

Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara is expected to approve national security charges against two aides of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Jonatan Urich and Eli Feldstein, related to the Qatargate affair. This involves allegations of improper lobbying for Qatar and contact with a foreign agent. A former senior Mossad official is also likely to be charged. The Shin Bet and Mossad are still finalizing their assessments, but officials believe there is enough evidence to proceed. Urich and Feldstein were arrested in March 2025 and remain under investigation. Netanyahu adviser Yisrael Einhorn, currently in Serbia, has avoided returning to Israel out of fear of arrest. Additionally, Urich faces separate charges for leaking classified information to the German media in 2024, allegedly to support Netanyahu's claims about Hamas obstructing hostage deals.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments in an investigative legal matter involving high-profile political figures without overtly favoring any side. It reports on expected charges, investigations, and legal proceedings without using biased language or selectively omitting perspectives.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on expectations regarding potential charges against Netanyahu's aides based on information from Channel 13 news. It mentions the involvement of Mossad and Shin Bet, and outlines the nature of the allegations (contact with foreign agents, corruption). While no primary source is av

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat journalistic but leans toward presenting the narrative of an ongoing investigation with implications of wrongdoing. There is some emphasis on the political stakes and potential conflicts of interest, which could be seen as slightly biased towards highlighting the seriousness of

The Times of Israel logoThe Times of IsraelIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7014 days ago
Netanyahu’s aides accused of leaking classified intel to Qatar for anti-Egypt push

Israeli media outlet Israel Hayom reported that three senior advisors to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Jonatan Urich, Yisrael Einhorn, and Eli Feldstein, allegedly leaked classified information about Israeli concerns regarding Egypt to Qatar. The leaks, according to the report, were part of a strategy by Qatar to undermine Egypt's position in hostage negotiations with Hamas. The information was obtained during classified discussions in March-May 2024 involving Netanyahu, the National Security Council, the IDF, and Shin Bet, focusing on Egypt's compliance with the 1979 peace agreement. The report claims that the leaks led to articles in the Israeli press questioning Egypt's adherence to the agreement. All three advisors are under investigation in the 'Qatargate' scandal, which includes allegations of corruption and contact with foreign agents. Urich and Feldstein have been arrested, while Einhorn, currently in Serbia, was recently questioned by Israeli authorities. Defense officials expressed concern that the leaks could jeopardize the peace agreement with Egypt and hinder efforts to secure the release of hostages held by Hamas. Einhorn's lawyer has dismissed the report as false.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the leak as a deliberate act by Netanyahu's aides to benefit Qatar, implying a potential betrayal of national interests. It emphasizes the risks to the Egypt-Israel peace agreement and portrays the aides as acting under foreign influence, which aligns with a left-leaning critique.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on allegations that Netanyahu's aides leaked classified information to Qatar, citing an Israeli security official and referencing the 'Qatargate' investigation. It provides context about the broader diplomatic situation involving Egypt and Qatar as mediators in ceasefire talks wi

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the allegations in a somewhat sensational manner, using phrases like 'allegedly on Doha’s payroll' and suggesting a coordinated campaign to undermine Egypt. This frames the story in a way that implies a deliberate conspiracy, which may introduce bias rather than presenting a pur

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 60Objective 5015 days ago
Election interference by Iran, Russia, or China may help PM Netanyahu, not hurt him - opinion

The article discusses concerns raised by David Zini, the new head of Israel's Shin Bet security agency, regarding potential foreign interference in Israel's upcoming election by nations such as Iran, Russia, and China. Zini, seen as a political ally of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, suggests that such interference could benefit Netanyahu rather than harm him. The piece speculates that Netanyahu might adopt tactics similar to those used by former U.S. President Donald Trump after a loss, potentially spreading disinformation to undermine confidence in the electoral process. It notes that while foreign interference is a real threat, the focus is on whose interests these actions might serve. The author argues that such interference aligns with the strategic goals of authoritarian regimes, which seek to destabilize democratic societies and weaken alliances. In Israel's context, the article implies that foreign interference could inadvertently support Netanyahu's continued political influence.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the potential foreign interference as serving the interests of authoritarian states, which aligns with a right-leaning perspective that often views democratic stability as under threat from external actors. The suggestion that Netanyahu could benefit from such interference is coul

Why factuality (60): The article presents an opinion piece discussing potential foreign interference in Israel's election, citing Maj.-Gen. David Zini as a political appointee of Netanyahu. While it references a real figure, it includes speculative claims about Netanyahu's possible strategies. Cross-source consensus sug

Why objectivity (50): The article clearly presents an opinion with a critical stance toward Netanyahu, suggesting he may manipulate public opinion. The language implies skepticism about his motives, which introduces a degree of bias.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories