ON
← Back to feed
Netanyahu on US plan: "As long as I am the Prime Minister, there will be no Palestinian state"
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsConservative29 days ago

Netanyahu on US plan: "As long as I am the Prime Minister, there will be no Palestinian state"

Na začetku današnje seje izraelske vlade je izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu dejal, da zavrača dokument v 15 točkah, ki so ga konec julija predstavile ZDA, in da ne bo izvedel nobenega umika s palestinskega ozemlja, dokler Hamas ne bo resnično razorožen. Netanjahu je dodal, da bo 'dokler bom jaz predsednik vlade, palestinske države ne bo'. Predhodno je izraelska vlada že minuli teden sporočila, da ne sprejema načrta za Gazo, čeprav je prejela zagotovilo, da bo umik izraelske vojske s palestinskega ozemlja šele po popolni razorožitvi Hamasa. Netanjahu se je minuli ponedeljek sestal z Odborom za mir ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa, kjer je prejel zagotovilo, da bo izraelska vojska s trenutnih položajev v Gazi morala umaknila šele po razorožitvi Hamasa, kar je Trump označil za naslednjo fazo mirovnega dogovora med Izraelom in islamističnimi gibanji.

Trump Bo Zelo Razočaran: Izrael Zavrača Ameriški Načrt, Netanjahu Vztraja, Umika Ne Bo On August 9, 2026, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu officially rejected a 15-point peace plan proposed by the U.S. administration under former President Donald Trump. The rejection came amid growing tensions between Israel and its closest ally, with Netanyahu emphasizing that Israeli forces would not withdraw from Palestinian territory until Hamas fully disarms. His remarks were delivered during a cabinet meeting and shared via video on social media, marking a public rift with one of the most influential figures in Israeli politics. The plan, presented by the U.S.-backed Gaza Peace Council led by Bulgarian diplomat Nikola Mladenov, outlined phased withdrawals of Israeli military presence from parts of Gaza in exchange for gradual disarmament of Hamas. According to the proposal, Hamas would hand over weapons to a newly formed National Committee of Palestinian technocrats, who would take over daily governance of the area. The plan also called for the deployment of temporary international stabilization forces to oversee security and compliance with the agreement. Netanyahu stated that Israel had been given assurances that the withdrawal would occur only after complete and immediate disarmament of Hamas, which he described as both heavy and light weaponry. Despite these assurances, Netanyahu’s government has consistently opposed the plan, arguing that it does not meet Israel's security requirements. In a video statement, he reiterated that the Israeli military would not make any withdrawals from Palestinian land unless Hamas fully disarms. “When I say ‘disarmament of Hamas,’ I mean it in the strongest sense,” he emphasized. He also stressed that the plan did not align with Israel’s vision for Gaza, which includes total Israeli control, full demilitarization, and the establishment of a civilian authority that does not promote terrorism. Netanyahu’s stance was reinforced by his coalition partners, particularly the far-right factions within his government, who have increasingly pressured him to reject the deal. These groups argue that any compromise on security could lead to further attacks by Hamas, citing past incidents such as the October 7, 2023, attack that killed hundreds of Israelis. Netanyahu himself has long maintained that a Palestinian state will not emerge while he holds office, a position he has repeated multiple times in recent months. The rejection of the U.S.-proposed plan has caused frustration in Washington. High-level American officials expressed disappointment, noting that the plan had initially received support from Hamas and other Palestinian factions. A senior U.S. official told reporters that President Trump would be “very disappointed” if Israel continued to block the initiative, which they believed could help end the prolonged conflict and allow civilians to return home safely. Hamas, however, has reaffirmed its commitment to the plan, calling for its full implementation. In a statement released through its Telegram channel, Hamas confirmed its adherence to the 15-point agreement and urged mediators to ensure all parties uphold their commitments. They emphasized that the plan requires the cessation of all forms of aggression by Israel and the withdrawal of its forces from Gaza. This stance contrasts sharply with Netanyahu’s insistence that Hamas must first demonstrate genuine disarmament before any Israeli troop movements occur. The U.S. peace council, represented by Mladenov, has continued to advocate for the plan, describing it as the only viable path forward. Mladenov told Israeli television that the process was designed to be reversible and transparent, allowing for pauses at any stage. He warned that failure to implement the plan could result in another attack by Hamas, echoing concerns raised by Israeli officials and security analysts. According to United Nations data, approximately 1.9 million people have been displaced from Gaza since the start of the war, representing nearly 90% of the population. The ongoing humanitarian crisis underscores the urgency of finding a lasting resolution, yet the political impasse between Israel and its allies continues to stall progress. As negotiations continue, Netanyahu has indicated that discussions with U.S. officials will proceed, though he has made it clear that Israel will not compromise on key security demands. With upcoming elections looming and internal pressures mounting, the Israeli government appears unlikely to soften its position, leaving the future of the Gaza peace effort uncertain.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 6 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Advertisement

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

6 reports

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 9029 days ago
Trump will be very disappointed: Israel rejects the American plan, Netanyahu insists there will be no withdrawal

Izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu je zavrnil 15-točkovni mirovni načrt za Gazo, ki ga je predlagala ameriška administracija Donalda Trumpa. Načrt predvidjal postopno izvajanje, vključno z umikom izraelske vojske in razorožitvijo Hamasa. Netanjahu je poudaril, da se vojska ne bo umaknila, dokler se Hamas popolnoma ne razoroži, kar je povzročilo javni razkol z najtesnejšo zaveznico Izraela. V Washingtonu je zavrnitev načrta naletela na razočaranje. Pogovori z ameriško stranjo še vedno potekajo, kljub razhajanju v stališčih.

Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje politično odločitev izraelskega primera, vendar ne prikazuje enstrannega stališča. Nekateri izrazi, kot so „razhajanja v stališčih“ in „neomajni pri teh interesih“, kažejo na strogo izraelsko pozicijo, vendar artikel ne izkliče izraelskega stališča ali predstavi ameriško stališče kot

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu rejected a 15-point U.S.-proposed ceasefire plan for Gaza, stating that Israel will not withdraw until Hamas is completely disarmed. This aligns closely with the content of other articles and provides specific details such as the v

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Netanyahu’s statements without overt bias or emotional language. It includes direct quotes and avoids taking sides in the conflict, focusing on factual reporting of his rejection of the U.S. proposal and the reasons behind it.

Primorske novice logoPrimorske noviceIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 8529 days ago
Netanyahu: Israel rejects the US plan for Gaza

Izraelčev premičnik Naftali Netanjahu je ob začetku današnje vladne seje izrazil zavračanje ameriškega načrta za Gazo, ki ga so ZDA predstavili konec julija. Netanjahu je poudaril, da bo Izrael 'ne izvedel nobenega umika' s palestinskega ozemlja, dokler Hamas ne bo resnično razorožen. Predhodno je Izrael že minuli teden zavrnil načrt, čeprav je prejel zagotovilo, da bo umik izraelske vojske iz Gaze prišel le po popolni razorožitvi Hamasa. Netanjahu je minuli ponedeljek sodeloval z odborom za mir ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa, kjer je prejel zagotovilo, da bo izraelska vojska umaknila iz Gaze šele po razorožitvi Hamasa, kar je Trump označil za naslednjo fazo mirovnega dogovora.

Bias read (Conservative): Artikel opisuje izraelsko zavračanje ameriškega načrta za Gazo, kar kaže na zadržano stališče proti diplomatskim pristopom. Izrazite podpore izraelskemu vladnemu vodji Netanjahuu, ki zavrača umik iz Gaze, ter poudarek na potrebi po razorožitvi Hamasa, kažejo na desničarsko okvirjenje. Poudarek na iz

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports Netanyahu's rejection of the U.S.-proposed plan for Gaza, citing his statements and the conditions he set. It includes relevant background information about the proposed plan and the meeting with Trump's Peace Committee. The content aligns with the cross-source consens

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting Netanyahu's position without overt bias. It includes direct quotes and contextual information, ensuring a balanced view of the situation.

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 8529 days ago
Benjamin Netanyahu: Israel rejects the US plan for Gaza

Izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu je zavrnil ameriški načrt za Gazo, ki ga so predstavili Združene države Amerike. Načrt predvideva umik izraelske vojske s palestinskega ozemlja šele po popolni razorožitvi islamističnega gibanja Hamas. Netanjahu je poudaril, da bo izraelska vojska ostala v Gazi dokler ne bo Hamas resnično razorožen. Predhodno je izraelska vlada zavrnila načrt, čeprav je prejela zagotovilo, da bo umik prišel le po razorožitvi. Netanjahu se je sestal z odborom za mir ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa, kjer je prejel zagotovilo, da bo načrt predstavljal naslednjo fazo mirovnega dogovora.

Bias read (Conservative): Artikel podčrtuje izraelsko stališče, da je načrt za Gazo preveč zasnovan za izraelske interese in da bi lahko povzročil nevarnost. Uporaba izrazov kot 'zavrača', 'ne bo izvedel nobenega umika' in poudarek na Hamasovem razoroženju kažejo na sklonjenost k izraelski politiki. Poudarek na izraelski voj

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports Netanyahu's rejection of the U.S.-proposed plan for Gaza, citing his statements and the conditions he set. It includes relevant background information about the proposed plan and the meeting with Trump's Peace Committee. The content aligns with the cross-source consens

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting Netanyahu's position without overt bias. It includes direct quotes and contextual information, ensuring a balanced view of the situation.

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7529 days ago
Israel rejects Trump's plan for Gaza

The article discusses Israel's rejection of Donald Trump's Gaza peace plan, which was announced last September. The plan included establishing a monitoring committee, disarming Hamas, Israeli withdrawal, and Gaza reconstruction. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the military will not withdraw until Hamas is fully disarmed and poses no threat. Hamas has reaffirmed its commitment to the agreement and called on mediators to ensure all parties respect the terms. Netanyahu's stance aligns with his coalition's pressure to take a hard line against Gaza, especially ahead of upcoming elections. The plan faces significant opposition within Israel, with some ministers calling it unacceptable. UN data indicates nearly 1.9 million people have been displaced in Gaza since the start of the conflict.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Israel's rejection of Trump's plan through the lens of Netanyahu's strong stance, emphasizing security concerns and the need for Hamas to disarm before any withdrawals. The emphasis on Netanyahu's position and the alignment with right-wing coalition members suggests a rightward sl

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Israel's rejection of Trump's Gaza plan, citing Netanyahu's statements and Hamas' conditional acceptance. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that Israel demands full demilitarization before any troop withdrawal. However, it lacks specific details on the exact te

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the situation neutrally but includes some interpretive commentary, such as noting Netanyahu's political positioning ahead of elections. While not overtly biased, it occasionally frames events from an Israeli perspective.

Delo logoDeloIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 80Objective 8529 days ago
Netanyahu: As long as I am Prime Minister, there will be no Palestinian state

Izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu zavrača načrt za Gazo, ki ga so predstavili Združene države Amerike, in trdi, da bo izraelska vojska ostala v palestinskih teritorijah, dokler se islamistično gibanje Hamas ne razoroži. Netanjahu je dejal, da ne bo prijel na umik izraelske vojske s palestinskega ozemlja, čeprav je bil prej prejet izjava, da bi to storil po popolni razorožitvi Hamasa. Predstavitev načrta je bila del pogovora med Netanjahou in odborom za mir ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa, kjer je bil potrjen, da bo načrt predstavljal naslednjo fazo mirovnega dogovora med Izraelom in Hamasom.

Bias read (Conservative): Artikel podpira izraelsko stališče, da je Hamas nelegalno gibanje, kar je skupno stališče desničarskih političnih strank. Poudarek na 'razorožitvi' Hamasa kot pogoju za umik izraelske vojske kaže na negativno oceno islamističnih organizacij. Uporaba izraelskega premierja kot glavnega govornika in pō

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports on the incident involving a missile strike on a tanker near the coast of Oman, citing UKMTO. It provides context about the increased tensions between the U.S. and Iran over control of the Strait of Hormuz. However, it lacks specific details about the nature of the U.S.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents information in a neutral manner, avoiding strong language or opinion. It provides multiple perspectives without taking a stance, making it highly objective.

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 70Objective 7029 days ago
Netanyahu on US plan: "As long as I am the Prime Minister, there will be no Palestinian state"

Na začetku današnje seje izraelske vlade je izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu dejal, da zavrača dokument v 15 točkah, ki so ga konec julija predstavile ZDA, in da ne bo izvedel nobenega umika s palestinskega ozemlja, dokler Hamas ne bo resnično razorožen. Netanjahu je dodal, da bo 'dokler bom jaz predsednik vlade, palestinske države ne bo'. Predhodno je izraelska vlada že minuli teden sporočila, da ne sprejema načrta za Gazo, čeprav je prejela zagotovilo, da bo umik izraelske vojske s palestinskega ozemlja šele po popolni razorožitvi Hamasa. Netanjahu se je minuli ponedeljek sestal z Odborom za mir ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa, kjer je prejel zagotovilo, da bo izraelska vojska s trenutnih položajev v Gazi morala umaknila šele po razorožitvi Hamasa, kar je Trump označil za naslednjo fazo mirovnega dogovora med Izraelom in islamističnimi gibanji.

Bias read (Conservative): Artikel podčrtuje izraelsko politično stališče, kjer Netanjahu izrazi zelo strogo nasprotovanje premeru ZDA glede umika iz Gaze, kar kaže na zunanje politično stališče. Uporaba izrazov kot 'zavrača dokument', 'ne bo izvedel nobenega umika' in ponavljanje izraelskega stališč o potrebi po razorožitvi,

Why factuality (70): Provides details about Netanyahu’s rejection of the US plan, citing AFP and referencing internal Israeli discussions. It includes quotes from officials and outlines the positions of both sides, supporting the factual basis of the claim.

Why objectivity (70): The article remains neutral, presenting the statements of Netanyahu and his coalition without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories