Candidates taking the UGC-NET sociology exam on June 30 reported numerous errors in the question paper, including misspelled names of key sociologists such as 'Ritzer' appearing as 'Putzer', 'Parsons' as 'Parsow', and others. They also pointed out grammatical errors, awkward Hindi translations, and questions that seemed unrelated to the prescribed syllabus. Some students claimed the questions appeared AI-generated and included random thinkers not covered in the curriculum. These issues led to confusion among examinees, with several expressing frustration over the lack of clarity and academic rigor in the exam. Similar concerns were raised regarding the UGC-NET English paper, where 67 out of 150 questions were reportedly duplicated from the 2024 exam. A senior NTA official stated they had not encountered any problems.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple candidate allegations and quotes from social media users without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct claims from examinees and mentions an official response from NTA, providing a balanced view of the controversy without clear ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article reports candidate allegations regarding spelling errors and content issues in the UGC-NET sociology paper. It provides specific examples of errors and quotes candidates' concerns, aligning with cross-source consensus. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'crossed all limits
