Minister Matoz, the CCP, the police and the prosecutor's office received anonymous reports with new alleged evidence of corruption, the anti-corruption2026 website is back online
An anti-corruption website called anti-corruption2026, which previously exposed secret conversations involving prominent leftist political figures and detailed corrupt practices of the political elite, has become accessible again after several months. The site remains active, with the latest recorded conversation still available under Appendix 5. Meanwhile, anonymous reports alleging corruption against multiple individuals were officially received by the Commission for Prevention of Corruption (KPK), the General Police Administration, and the Specialized State Prosecution, with Interior Minister Franci Matoz among the recipients. These reports include four previously submitted claims from March 2026. The KPK has confirmed receipt but has not publicly disclosed this information. Additionally, there are developments regarding the sudden cancellation of a meeting at the Commission for Control of Intelligence and Security Services (KNOVS) led by MP Janja Sluga from the Freedom Movement. Sluga had planned to present information about potential foreign influence, particularly from Russia and Israel, on Slovenia’s sovereignty and national security. However, she canceled the session, which
The anti-corruption website anti-corruption2026 has become active again after several months offline, reigniting speculation about potential new revelations regarding alleged corruption among high-profile political figures in Slovenia. The site, which previously published a series of secretly recorded conversations involving prominent members of the left-wing political establishment before the parliamentary elections, once again features all known recordings. These include discussions with former Justice Minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, Rok Hodej, who mentions the possibility of resolving business matters through personal connections, and Nina Zidar Klemenčič, who discusses Ljubljana Mayor Zoran Janković and alleged commissions in construction projects. According to media reports, the Commission for Preventing Corruption, the General Police Directorate, and the Specialized State Prosecution received a new anonymous complaint on Tuesday related to multiple individuals accused of corrupt practices. Among the recipients of the electronic message was current Interior Minister Franci Matoz. The sender indicated that they were resubmitting four complaints originally filed with the Commission for Preventing Corruption in March 2026. The exact content of these complaints remains unknown, though it is rumored that the same individual or group behind the anti-corruption2026 website is responsible for this latest submission. The renewed activity of the website has sparked speculation about whether further publications will follow. Meanwhile, the anonymous nature of the complaints raises questions about their credibility and the potential impact they might have on ongoing investigations into alleged corruption within the political sphere. The website anti-corruption2026, which had been inaccessible for several months, became available again today. It contains a series of secretly recorded conversations involving notable members of the left-wing political establishment, revealing detailed information about alleged corrupt activities by the political elite at the time. All previously published recordings are accessible once more, including the last published conversation with Jože Oberstar, a former official at DARS, which can still be found under the fifth appendix. In the editorial office, we obtained information indicating that on Tuesday, August 25, the Commission for Preventing Corruption, the General Police Directorate, and the Specialized State Prosecution, among others, including current Interior Minister Franci Matoz, received an official anonymous complaint concerning several different individuals accused of corruption. According to the screen capture of the electronic message, the sender, using the email address [email protected], noted that they were resubmitting four complaints initially submitted to the Commission for Preventing Corruption back in March 2026. The Commission has not publicly disclosed any such complaint. We are investigating the matter. The electronic message we obtained in the editorial office indicates that the sender, using the email address [email protected], noted that they were resubmitting four complaints initially submitted to the Commission for Preventing Corruption back in March 2026. The Commission has not publicly disclosed any such complaint. We are investigating the matter. The recent developments suggest a possible reason why Janja Sluga, a member of the Freedom Movement and head of the Commission for Oversight of Intelligence and Security Services (KNOVS), unexpectedly postponed a meeting. During the Tuesday session of KNOVS, representatives of Sove would have presented information to KNOVS members regarding potential influence by third countries, particularly Russia and Israel, on Slovenia's sovereignty and national security. Members of the Freedom Movement have built their campaign in the final days before the election primarily around the question of who recorded secret conversations with members of the left-wing political scene, exposing corruption, yet they have avoided addressing the content of the intercepted communications. Janez Janša faced accusations over the BlackCube affair, and just before the election, the Freedom Movement allegedly used Sove under the leadership of Josip Kadivnik to mislead the public about having evidence of Israeli interference in Slovenian elections. However, no evidence was ever shown. Janez Stušek, the director of Sove, had planned to take his daughter to Denmark, but due to Janja Sluga’s insistence, he canceled his trip. Sluga then unexpectedly postponed the session. Was she afraid of something? Sources indicate that Sluga received information on Tuesday morning that a new anonymous complaint regarding corruption-related video footage had arrived at the Commission for Preventing Corruption, police, and prosecution, along with attached documents, and that Interior Minister Franci Matoz had received and presumably opened them. Information about this reached the Freedom Movement quickly, possibly from the Specialized State Prosecution or the Commission for Preventing Corruption.
An anti-corruption website called anti-corruption2026, which previously exposed secret conversations involving prominent leftist political figures and detailed corrupt practices of the political elite, has become accessible again after several months. The site remains active, with the latest recorded conversation still available under Appendix 5. Meanwhile, anonymous reports alleging corruption against multiple individuals were officially received by the Commission for Prevention of Corruption (KPK), the General Police Administration, and the Specialized State Prosecution, with Interior Minister Franci Matoz among the recipients. These reports include four previously submitted claims from March 2026. The KPK has confirmed receipt but has not publicly disclosed this information. Additionally, there are developments regarding the sudden cancellation of a meeting at the Commission for Control of Intelligence and Security Services (KNOVS) led by MP Janja Sluga from the Freedom Movement. Sluga had planned to present information about potential foreign influence, particularly from Russia and Israel, on Slovenia’s sovereignty and national security. However, she canceled the session, which
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations of corruption as credible and significant, emphasizing the involvement of high-profile political figures and the potential implications for national integrity. It highlights the efforts of anti-corruption advocates and criticizes the lack of transparency from state
Why factuality (83): This article provides similar information as the first, confirming the reactivation of the anti-corruption2026 site and mentioning the receipt of an anonymous report by authorities. It includes additional details such as the email address of the sender and the date of the report. These details are c
Why objectivity (68): While this article is slightly more detailed than the previous one, it still maintains a somewhat critical tone towards the political establishment, particularly through the use of terms like 'domnevnimi dokazi korupcije' (alleged evidence of corruption). It does not present alternative viewpoints o
The website anti-corruption2026 has reactivated after several months, reposting previously published videos of secret conversations involving prominent figures from Slovenia’s left-wing political scene. The content includes discussions about alleged connections, influence, and corrupt practices within Slovenian politics. Among those featured are former Justice Minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, Rok Hodej, and Nina Zidar Klemenčič, who speak about potential corruption involving politicians such as Ljubljana mayor Zoran Janković. It is reported that the Corruption Prevention Commission, the General Police Directorate, and the Specialized State Prosecution received a new anonymous complaint linked to multiple individuals, including current Interior Minister Franci Matoz. The complainant claims to be resubmitting four complaints originally filed in March 2026, though their exact contents remain unknown. The reactivation of the site has sparked speculation about whether further revelations will follow.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information neutrally, citing allegations and reports without taking a stance on the truth of the claims or the actions of any individual. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, selective sourcing, or omission of context.
Why factuality (78): The article reports on the reactivation of the anti-corruption2026 website and mentions specific individuals involved in alleged corruption, including former officials like Dominika Švarc Pipan, Rok Hodej, and Zoran Janković. It also references an anonymous report received by the Commission for Prev
Why objectivity (65): The tone suggests skepticism toward the credibility of the anti-corruption2026 site and implies potential bias against political figures. The article uses phrases like 'domnevnih povezav' (alleged connections) and 'koruptivna ravnanja' (corrupt behavior) which carry a critical tone. There is a lack
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.