ON
← Back to feed
We release Stevanovic's third final conviction
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9/8/2026

We release Stevanovic's third final conviction

The article reports on a third legally binding conviction against Zoran Stevanović, former police officer and current president of the parliament, from 2011. The court ruled that he used false representations to mislead someone, leading them to lend him €2,500 in April 2008. Stevanović was sentenced to six months in prison, conditional on not committing further offenses and returning the money within a year. The article notes that this conviction was finalized 15 years ago, but it remains legally valid. It also highlights his prior convictions for threatening safety and attempting to defraud an insurance company, which he denied during election campaigns. The article contrasts statements from a state councilor who claims such old cases 'do not exist' once erased from criminal records, with an information officer stating that public figures cannot expect such cases to be erased from history.

The former police officer and current president of the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, has been found to have three final criminal convictions dating back to his past. According to media reports, these include a conviction for fraud in 2011, which was based on a loan agreement he entered into with a woman in April 2008. At the time, Stevanović asked her to lend him €2,500, offering a car as collateral. However, the vehicle was not his, and he failed to repay the loan, prompting the victim to seek legal recourse. In 2010, Stevanović was convicted of fraud, and the ruling became final in 2011. He received a six-month conditional prison sentence, along with an obligation to return the borrowed money within one year of the ruling's finality. His legal team has stated that Stevanović does not intend to comment on "old, closed, and erased cases that are not related to his political activities." They emphasized that Stevanović can provide a certificate of non-conviction at any time and that there is currently no ongoing criminal case against him. This revelation adds to previous disclosures about Stevanović’s past. Earlier this year, it was revealed that he had been convicted twice before, once for threatening someone's safety and once for attempting to defraud an insurance company. In the latter case, he allegedly staged a traffic accident to claim over €7,600 in compensation. At the time of the election, he denied the conviction. According to documents obtained by the Trma.si portal, Stevanović was also found guilty in 2003 of threatening a man with violence, leading to a fine for endangering safety. These convictions were eventually removed from his criminal record after the legally mandated period had passed. As such, Stevanović is currently considered legally unconvicted and can present a certificate confirming his non-conviction status. The revelations have sparked discussions about whether past convictions should remain part of public memory even after being officially erased from records. An information representative cited by 24ur noted that high-profile individuals cannot expect such incidents to be completely erased from public consciousness due to rehabilitation. Stevanović responded to the latest disclosure by posting a certificate from the criminal registry on Facebook, indicating that no criminal sanctions were currently recorded against him. He suggested that attention could be diverted from efforts to combat organized political crime by focusing on older, unrelated matters. He also mentioned that the prosecution of organized political crime had recently begun with the case involving Golob and that further developments would follow in September. Additional coverage suggests that another potential conviction might exist. According to Trma.si, documents indicate that Stevanović may have faced a fourth conviction in 2020 related to spreading false information about Saint Janez Černjak. This alleged conviction was reportedly handled by the local court in Kranj. However, these claims require further verification and official confirmation.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 859/6/2026
We release Stevanovic's third final conviction

The article reports on a third legally binding conviction against Zoran Stevanović, former police officer and current president of the parliament, from 2011. The court ruled that he used false representations to mislead someone, leading them to lend him €2,500 in April 2008. Stevanović was sentenced to six months in prison, conditional on not committing further offenses and returning the money within a year. The article notes that this conviction was finalized 15 years ago, but it remains legally valid. It also highlights his prior convictions for threatening safety and attempting to defraud an insurance company, which he denied during election campaigns. The article contrasts statements from a state councilor who claims such old cases 'do not exist' once erased from criminal records, with an information officer stating that public figures cannot expect such cases to be erased from history.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the ongoing legal status of Stevanović’s past convictions as a relevant issue despite his current political role. It emphasizes the persistence of these legal actions against a prominent politician, suggesting a critique of his lack of accountability. While not overtly partisan, a

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the primary source document from POP TV, including details about Stevanović’s 2010 conviction, the nature of the crime, the car loan scam, and the conditions of his sentence. It also mentions prior convictions and the government’s response, aligning closely with the or

Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without overt bias. However, there is a slight editorial tilt when mentioning the government’s response, implying potential controversy, though not explicitly taking sides.

Siol.net logoSiol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 50Objective 609/8/2026
Stevanović is not the only one: Slovenian handball star's conviction expunged

The article discusses the case of Vlado Bojović, a former top Slovenian handball player who was convicted in 1984 for his involvement in a fight in Celje where a truck driver died. His conviction was later removed from criminal records, allowing him to hold public office. Despite this past, Bojović received one of the highest pensions for sports achievements in 2024 and 2025, amounting to over €22,000 annually. The article also mentions Peter Vilfan, a former basketball player and MP who proposed the law granting such pensions, despite having been convicted in 2015 for causing a traffic accident that injured a pedestrian. Vilfan also received a pension for his sports achievements in 2022.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights discrepancies between past convictions and current benefits, suggesting a potential imbalance in how individuals with criminal histories receive state support. It frames these cases critically, emphasizing the contrast between legal penalties and financial rewards, which leans

Why factuality (50): The article mentions Vlado Bojović's conviction and connection to the Vilfan law but does not provide specific figures about his pension supplement or compare him to others like Arnož Polič. It references the existence of the Vilfan law but doesn't align with the primary document's detailed financia

Why objectivity (60): The article has a somewhat biased tone by focusing on Bojović's criminal past and linking it to the Vilfan law. While it presents facts neutrally, the framing emphasizes controversy rather than providing balanced context.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories