24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 859/6/2026 We release Stevanovic's third final convictionThe article reports on a third legally binding conviction against Zoran Stevanović, former police officer and current president of the parliament, from 2011. The court ruled that he used false representations to mislead someone, leading them to lend him €2,500 in April 2008. Stevanović was sentenced to six months in prison, conditional on not committing further offenses and returning the money within a year. The article notes that this conviction was finalized 15 years ago, but it remains legally valid. It also highlights his prior convictions for threatening safety and attempting to defraud an insurance company, which he denied during election campaigns. The article contrasts statements from a state councilor who claims such old cases 'do not exist' once erased from criminal records, with an information officer stating that public figures cannot expect such cases to be erased from history.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the ongoing legal status of Stevanović’s past convictions as a relevant issue despite his current political role. It emphasizes the persistence of these legal actions against a prominent politician, suggesting a critique of his lack of accountability. While not overtly partisan, a
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the primary source document from POP TV, including details about Stevanović’s 2010 conviction, the nature of the crime, the car loan scam, and the conditions of his sentence. It also mentions prior convictions and the government’s response, aligning closely with the or
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without overt bias. However, there is a slight editorial tilt when mentioning the government’s response, implying potential controversy, though not explicitly taking sides.
Siol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 50Objective 609/8/2026 Stevanović is not the only one: Slovenian handball star's conviction expungedThe article discusses the case of Vlado Bojović, a former top Slovenian handball player who was convicted in 1984 for his involvement in a fight in Celje where a truck driver died. His conviction was later removed from criminal records, allowing him to hold public office. Despite this past, Bojović received one of the highest pensions for sports achievements in 2024 and 2025, amounting to over €22,000 annually. The article also mentions Peter Vilfan, a former basketball player and MP who proposed the law granting such pensions, despite having been convicted in 2015 for causing a traffic accident that injured a pedestrian. Vilfan also received a pension for his sports achievements in 2022.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights discrepancies between past convictions and current benefits, suggesting a potential imbalance in how individuals with criminal histories receive state support. It frames these cases critically, emphasizing the contrast between legal penalties and financial rewards, which leans
Why factuality (50): The article mentions Vlado Bojović's conviction and connection to the Vilfan law but does not provide specific figures about his pension supplement or compare him to others like Arnož Polič. It references the existence of the Vilfan law but doesn't align with the primary document's detailed financia
Why objectivity (60): The article has a somewhat biased tone by focusing on Bojović's criminal past and linking it to the Vilfan law. While it presents facts neutrally, the framing emphasizes controversy rather than providing balanced context.