ON
← Back to feed
Nearly 70 per cent of Britons think high-earners already pay their fair share in blow to Burnham's tax-the-rich agenda
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives11 hr. ago

Nearly 70 per cent of Britons think high-earners already pay their fair share in blow to Burnham's tax-the-rich agenda

A report by the Adam Smith Institute indicates that nearly 70% of Britons believe high earners already pay their fair share of taxes, challenging Prime Minister Andy Burnham's 'tax-the-rich' agenda. The study highlights that the top 1% of earners contribute 28.2% of all taxes despite earning just 13.3% of national income. Data from the Office for National Statistics reveals that wealthier households face rising prices faster than lower-income groups, and the number of millionaires in the UK dropped by 7% under Labour's policies. Critics, including former Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride and economist Lord O'Neill of Gatley, argue that continued tax increases could harm economic growth and drive wealthy individuals abroad. Burnham has expressed openness to raising capital gains tax but has not committed to specific measures.

2 reports

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 783 days ago
Burnham warned against ‘stupid’ capital gains tax decision

Former Conservative Treasury minister Lord O'Neill of Gatley criticized Andy Burnham's proposal to increase capital gains tax, calling it a 'stupid' decision. O'Neill argued that raising the tax would discourage business activity, leading to lower revenues as entrepreneurs might delay sales or relocate assets overseas. He emphasized that businesses are already struggling due to Brexit, changes in national insurance, and labor market reforms, making additional taxation counterproductive. O'Neill also advised Burnham to prioritize regions like London and the Northern Powerhouse for economic growth rather than pursuing 'growth in every postcode.' While praising Burnham's efforts to foster positivity, O'Neill stressed the need for pragmatic policymaking.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the criticism of capital gains tax increases as a misguided policy choice, using terms like 'stupid' and emphasizing negative consequences for business activity. The emphasis on prioritizing economically vibrant regions like London over a more evenly distributed growth strategy is

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Lord O’Neill’s comments as quoted in The Times, including his criticism of Andy Burnham’s capital gains tax proposal. It provides context about O’Neill’s background and his concerns about the impact on business activity. While it does not include direct quotes from Bur

Why objectivity (78): The article maintains a generally neutral tone but uses emotionally charged language such as 'stupid' and 'scared and lazy,' which may reflect O’Neill’s personal opinion rather than objective analysis. It frames the debate around O’Neill’s criticisms without presenting counterarguments, which slight

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentConservative11 hr. ago
Nearly 70 per cent of Britons think high-earners already pay their fair share in blow to Burnham's tax-the-rich agenda

A report by the Adam Smith Institute indicates that nearly 70% of Britons believe high earners already pay their fair share of taxes, challenging Prime Minister Andy Burnham's 'tax-the-rich' agenda. The study highlights that the top 1% of earners contribute 28.2% of all taxes despite earning just 13.3% of national income. Data from the Office for National Statistics reveals that wealthier households face rising prices faster than lower-income groups, and the number of millionaires in the UK dropped by 7% under Labour's policies. Critics, including former Shadow Chancellor Sir Mel Stride and economist Lord O'Neill of Gatley, argue that continued tax increases could harm economic growth and drive wealthy individuals abroad. Burnham has expressed openness to raising capital gains tax but has not committed to specific measures.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the opposition to Labour's tax policies as a broader concern for economic growth and individual responsibility, using terms like 'wealth creators' and 'punishing success.' It emphasizes criticism of Labour's fiscal policies while highlighting the perspective of conservative thinkt

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories