Posłanka Katarzyna Piekarska, członek klubu Odpowiedzialnej Polski (KO), zasłabła w trakcie debaty w Sejmie w czwartek, 19 czerwca 2026, po wypowiedziach, które dotyczyły oskarżeń o korzystanie z uprzywilejowanego traktowania w warszawskim Szpitalu Południowym. W trakcie dyskusji z politykami PiS, Piekarska wdała się w konfrontację, w której oskarżała ich o publikację grafiki przedstawiającej listę lekarzy, którzy, według opinii PiS, korzystali z usług szpitala poza kolejką. W efekcie, w trakcie głosowania, Piekarska zasłabła i osunęła się na sejmowe ławy. Z pomocą innych posłów i funkcjonariuszy Straży Marszałkowskiej opuściła salę obrad. W piątek, 20 czerwca, posłanka pojawiła się w Sejmie, gdzie odpowiadała na pytania medialne. W odpowiedzi na pytanie, co wydarzyło się poprzedniego dnia, Piekarska powiedziała, że działania PiS podniosły jej ciśnienie, a „myślę, że każdy ma swój taki próg, poza który jak się wychodzi, to po prostu nie daje rady”.
Piekarska wyjaśniła, że oskarżenia PiS dotyczą jej korzystania z uprzywilejowanego traktowania w szpitalu, jednak podkreśliła, że nigdy nie była tam w trakcie leczenia. Podkreślała, że jest w procedurze leczenia takiej samej jak inne pacjentki, a że nie ma żadnych dokumentów potwierdzających te oskarżenia. W odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy może prześledzić miejsce, gdzie leczy się, Piekarska odmówiła, sugerując, że informacje te są dostępne w mediach społecznościowych. Dodatkowo, Piekarska wspomniała, że posłowie PiS Rafał Bochenek przeprosił ją w wiadomości prywatnej, za co podziękowała, ale uważała, że oskarżenia powinny być publicznie przeprosione.
W kontekście tych wydarzeń, Sejm uchwalił ustawę, która umożliwia Agencji Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji (AOTMiT) gromadzenie danych o wynagrodzeniach lekarzy po numerze PESEL lub numerze prawa wykonywania zawodu (PWZ). Ustawa została uchwalona w trybie ekspresowym, po ujawnieniu przez portal Zero.pl informacji o lekarzu Dawidzie Kacprzyku, który zarobił 1,6 mln zł w trakcie specjalizacji, pracując głównie w publicznych placówkach. W trakcie debaty w Sejmie, posłowie z Prawa i Sprawiedliwości (PiS) głosowali za ustawą, a 177 posłów wstrzymało się od głosu. Poprawki, które dotyczyły wprowadzenia obowiązku publikowania konkursów ofert w systemie teleinformatycznym, zostały odrzucone.
Prezes AOTMiT podkreślał, że nie ma intencji śledzenia konkretnego człowieka, ale pokazywanie rzetelnych analiz zmian w systemie wynagrodzeń. Dane, które zostaną zbierane, mają pomóc w lepszym zarządzaniu systemem opieki zdrowotnej. Z kolei, rzecznik Naczelnej Izby Lekarskiej Jakub Kosikowski ostrzegał, że narzucenie sztywnego limitu wynagrodzeń lub stawki godzinowej może pogłębić kryzys szpitali, szczególnie w regionach wiejskich.
W międzyczasie, media i środowiska polityczne dyskutowali, czy nowe przepisy są odpowiednie, czy mogą prowadzić do ograniczenia wolności lekarzy. Eksperty wskazywały, że choć zbieranie danych o wynagrodzeniach lekarzy jest istotne, samo zebranie danych nie wystarczy – potrzebne są dalsze działania naprawcze. W tym kontekście, Sejm uchwalił ustawę, a teraz będzie ona omawiana w Senacie, a następnie trafi na biurko prezydenta. W międzyczasie, Marszałek Sejmu Włodzimierz Czarzasty w rozmowie z Bogdanem Rymanowskim w programie „Śniadanie Rymanowskiego” poruszył kwestię wynagrodzeń lekarzy, podkreślając, że to ważne temat, który wymaga dalszych działań.
10 reports
TVN24IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8514 days ago MP Katarzyna Piekarska explains the weakness in the Sejm. "I think that everyone has their own threshold"Posłanka Katarzyna Piekarska z partii KO wyjaśniła, że jej zasłabnięcie w Sejmie miało miejsce podczas dyskusji z politykami PiS, która dotyczyła oskarżeń o korzystanie z uprzywilejowanej opieki medycznej w Szpitalu Południowym w Warszawie. Piekarska stwierdziła, że była w tej samej procedurze leczenia co inni pacjenci i ujawniła, że choruje na raka piersi.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Piekarska's explanation and the claims made by PiS politicians without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Piekarska and references the allegations against her without taking a stance on their validity.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides direct quotes and factual information about the incident and Piekarska's explanation. It remains largely objective despite mentioning political tensions.
RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8014 days ago The Sejm passed a law on linking the salary information of doctors with the PESEL numberThe Polish Sejm has passed a bill linking information about doctors' salaries with their PESEL numbers. The bill was approved by 253 MPs, with no opposition and 177 abstentions, including 173 from the ruling PiS faction. During the second reading, the chair of the health committee recommended adopting the bill without amendments. PiS MP Janusz Cieszyński proposed adding provisions for publishing information about tenders in healthcare, emphasizing transparency. However, these amendments were rejected. The data collected by the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tarification (AOTMiT) –
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details about the legislative process, including voting outcomes, proposed amendments, and the rationale provided by involved parties. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of key perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): The article accurately summarizes the legislative process and the rejection of PiS amendments. It maintains a neutral tone throughout.
TVN24IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7514 days ago Salary control for doctors: Parliament approves collection of data "after PESEL"The Polish Sejm has passed a law allowing the collection of data on doctors' salaries using their PESEL numbers or PWZ identifiers. Previously, this information was collected anonymously, making it difficult to identify individuals working in multiple locations under different contracts. The law was adopted quickly following reports of extremely high earnings by a doctor during specialization, with 253 MPs voting in favor and 177 abstaining. Social media and experts emphasize that collecting data alone is insufficient and further corrective actions and potential changes to the salary-increase法
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details about the legislative process and includes balanced perspectives from social media and experts without overtly favoring any side. It does not use emotionally charged language or selectively present sources.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Accurate reporting on the law's passage and its implications. However, the article includes some subjective analysis about the need for further reforms, slightly affecting objectivity.
RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7015 days ago AOTMiT CEO on disclosure of doctors' salaries: We don't want to follow a specific personThe Ministry of Health is working on regulations that would allow the Agency for Medical Technology Assessment and Tarification (AOTMiT) to monitor doctors' earnings using their PESEL number or professional license number. The goal is to obtain accurate and easily accessible information about doctors' incomes, including those who work under multiple contracts across different hospitals and those employed full-time. The agency emphasizes that it does not intend to track individuals but rather provide an honest analysis of changes in the healthcare payment system. Current data only reflects a单一的
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the rationale behind the proposed monitoring of doctors' earnings and the potential concerns regarding privacy and data collection. It includes quotes from officials and provides statistical context without overtly favoring one side over the other.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): The article accurately covers the new law and its implications but includes some subjective commentary on the government's motives.
OKO.pressIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7014 days ago Doctors' salaries, the Sejm passed the law, what did PiS do, what will the president do?The Polish Sejm has passed a bill linking doctors' salaries to their PESEL numbers, allowing the Agency for Medical Technology Assessment and Tarification to collect this data. The bill was approved without opposition but with 177 MPs abstaining, including nearly all members of the PiS party. The legislation follows revelations by Zero.pl about high earnings of a KO councilor and potential VIP access for politicians at a hospital. The bill now moves to the Senate and will eventually reach the president.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts about the legislative process, mentions the lack of opposition, and notes the abstentions from various parties, including PiS. It does not take a clear stance or use biased language, providing a balanced overview of the situation.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the passage of the law linking doctors' salaries to PESEL numbers but includes speculative commentary about PiS's actions and the president's potential response, which lacks specific details from the primary source.
OKO.pressIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6014 days ago Sobkowiak-Czarnecka was appointed Deputy Minister of Defence.The Polish Sejm passed a bill linking doctors' salaries to their PESEL numbers, allowing the Agency for Medical Technology Assessment and Tarification to collect this data. The bill was supported by all parties except nearly the entire PiS faction, which abstained along with some other MPs. The legislation was accelerated after revelations that a KO councilor earned 1.6 million zł while working at a hospital, including access to a VIP clinic. The Senate will now consider the bill, and it is expected to reach President Andrzej Duda's desk soon.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on legislative action, opposition within the Sejm, and contextual background without taking a clear stance on the policy itself or the political actors involved.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): The article mentions the law and its passage but also discusses unrelated topics like the anti-SLAPP law. This mix of subjects reduces both factual accuracy and objectivity.
OKO.pressIndependentLeftFactual 40Objective 3014 days ago Why do we have to look in the pockets of doctors?The article discusses concerns over high salaries of doctors in Poland, citing a case where a doctor earned 1.7 million złoty per month. It criticizes the current salary adjustment rules introduced by the PiS government in 2022, which have contributed to financial strain on the National Health Fund (NFZ). The article highlights reduced funding for preventive care services and growing public dissatisfaction with the situation.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue as a result of policies implemented by the PiS government, implying criticism toward their economic decisions. It emphasizes the negative consequences of these policies on public healthcare access while highlighting the disparity between rising doctor salaries and cuts ̈
Why these scores (Factual 40 · Objective 30): The article makes unsubstantiated claims about 10% of doctors earning over 100k zł monthly, references a law not mentioned in the primary source, and presents biased language like 'we will cut their salaries' without evidence, showing poor factual accuracy and strong bias.
Polsat NewsIndependentCenter13 days ago A special edition of "Rymanovsky's Breakfast", hosted by the Marshal of the SejmThe upcoming episode of the 'Śniadanie Rymanowskiego' program on Polsat News will feature Włodzimierz Czarzasty, the Marshal of the Sejm, as a guest. The discussion will cover topics such as Polish citizens' security, relations with Ukraine, and doctors' salaries. This edition will differ from usual by featuring fewer politicians and focusing on a high-profile individual. Previously, the show had an interview with President Karol Nawrocki in this format.
Bias read (Center): The article provides neutral information about a scheduled TV interview with a prominent political figure. It does not present any biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content is factual and descriptive of the event without taking a stance.
RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenter14 days ago As much as $350,000 a month on a single doctor's bill.The Polish parliament has passed legislation allowing the Agency for Medical Technology Assessment and Tarification (AOTMiT) to collect doctors' earnings in public healthcare based on their PESEL number or professional license number. This change aims to provide transparency regarding individual doctors' incomes, which were previously reported through separate contracts and invoices with multiple hospitals. Currently, AOTMiT collects data based on individual agreements but does not aggregate total earnings across all contracts. The new law will enable the government to track how much each doctor earns across the entire public healthcare system. According to recent data, some doctors earned between 300,000 and 350,000 zł per month through single invoices, highlighting concerns over high salaries in the sector. Experts note that this regulation does not address the issue of high earnings directly but provides greater visibility into where and how much doctors earn.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legislative changes related to tracking doctors' earnings in public healthcare. It includes quotes from experts and references data from AOTMiT without overtly favoring any political side. The content focuses on transparency and regulatory updates, with
RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenter17 days ago The government has approved the bill.The Polish government has decided to introduce controls over doctors' earnings using personal identification numbers and professional qualification codes. This decision comes after reports of a doctor earning nearly two million złoty in 2025. Prime Minister Donald Tusk emphasized that this measure is necessary due to concerns about excessive earnings in the healthcare sector and the lack of transparency in current systems.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's decision neutrally, citing statements from Prime Minister Donald Tusk without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from officials and explains the rationale behind the policy without apparent ideological framing.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter