Nana borgatara: the magistrate attacks Meloni on the decree on salaries. Then he defends himself: "It's the hackers' fault".

Il Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenter19 hr. ago

Alessandro Di Cicco, a prosecutor in Rome, posted a controversial message on his Facebook profile criticizing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni for not signing a decree increasing judges' salaries, as mandated by a Council of State ruling. The post was widely condemned by Italy’s right-wing political forces and the National Association of Judges, who called the comments institutionally disrespectful. However, Di Cicco denied authorship of the post, claiming his Facebook profile had been hacked. He reported the incident to police and Meta, stating he discovered unauthorized activity on his account and immediately removed the post while blocking his profile.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the controversy surrounding the post and Di Cicco's denial of authorship, including his claim of being hacked. It includes perspectives from multiple parties, right-wing politicians, the National Association of Judges, and Di Cicco himself, without overtly favoring any side.

La StampaIndependent🔒Centeryesterday

Alessandro Di Cicco, a magistrate working in Rome's prosecution office, posted on his Facebook profile a message criticizing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni over her stance on a decree concerning salary increases for judges. The post was later removed by Di Cicco, who claimed it had been hacked. Meloni had previously stated she would not sign a decree allocating nearly a billion euros to raise judges' salaries, arguing this amount was ten times more than what she intended to allocate for addressing issues in the transportation sector. The National Association of Magistrates (Anm) clarified that the salary adjustments were mandated by law and had been delayed for years, emphasizing they were not bonuses or gifts but legally required payments. Di Cicco denied authorship of the controversial post and explained he was traveling at the time it appeared.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the magistrate's criticism of the prime minister and the prime minister's explanation of her position, along with the clarification from the National Association of Magistrates. There is no evident bias toward either side, and the content remains balanced.