The article discusses the legal and political debate surrounding the term 'Gefährder' (threatener) in Germany after a terrorist attack in Berlin. According to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), there were 410 Islamist threateners nationwide at the beginning of July, including Abdul Ballout, who was able to plan and execute an attack before being shot by police. This has led to calls for stricter measures against threateners, such as preventive detention and electronic ankle bracelets. However, these measures are already legally possible but require complex procedures. The article explains that the term 'Gefährder' is not defined in any law and is used primarily in police practice. It highlights the lack of uniformity across federal and state laws regarding the definition and treatment of threateners, especially in relation to international terrorism.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of the legal and political challenges surrounding the concept of 'Gefährder' in Germany. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather outlines the complexities and controversies within the current legal framework. While it mentions specific calls,





