A family member has been waiting over two years for a court decision on inheritance following the death of their mother, despite having already submitted an inheritance agreement to the court nearly a year ago. The situation has raised concerns about the efficiency of the legal process and the rights of heirs in such cases. According to reports, the deceased’s daughter, who wrote to the newspaper, explained that her mother passed away in June 2024, and although she and her brother promptly submitted the inheritance agreement in January 2025, they have yet to receive any official communication or ruling from the court. This delay has left them uncertain about the status of their case and how long they might need to wait before receiving a resolution.
The heir noted that while similar cases within the same family were resolved much more quickly—within several months—their particular case has remained unresolved for over two years. She also mentioned that another relative, whose mother died in September 2025, received a binding court decision regarding inheritance relatively soon after submitting the necessary documents. This contrast highlights the confusion and frustration felt by the heir, who is now seeking ways to expedite the process and understand why her case is taking so long compared to others.
Legal experts suggest that the heir can take specific steps to address this issue. One option is to formally request information from the court about the current status of the case. This involves sending a written inquiry to the court, including the case number, the date of the deceased's death, the date when the inheritance agreement was submitted, and asking for updates on the progress of the case and an estimated timeframe for a decision. Such a request can help clarify whether there are delays due to administrative backlogs, missing documentation, or other procedural issues.
Additionally, the heir has the right to access the court file, which contains all relevant records related to the case. By reviewing these documents, the heir could determine if any essential information or paperwork is missing, or if the case has been assigned to a judge or court clerk. This step allows for a detailed examination of the proceedings and helps identify potential obstacles that may be causing the delay.
If the court continues to delay the process without justification, the heir may consider filing a supervisory complaint. This legal action can be taken if the court is perceived as unnecessarily prolonging the case, potentially violating the right to a timely judicial decision. A supervisory complaint can prompt the court president to order an acceleration of the process or implement other corrective measures. However, this should be considered a last resort after exhausting other avenues of inquiry and communication with the court.
Legal professionals emphasize that each inheritance case is unique, and factors such as the size of the estate, the workload of the court, and the complexity of the legal procedures involved can vary significantly between cases. Therefore, comparing one case to another does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing or inefficiency on the part of the court. Nevertheless, the heir is advised to remain proactive in monitoring the status of their case and to seek legal assistance if needed.
In light of these developments, the heir is encouraged to take immediate action to ensure transparency and fairness in the legal process. Whether through formal inquiries, accessing court files, or pursuing a supervisory complaint, the goal is to obtain clarity and resolve the matter as efficiently as possible. Legal aid services are available to assist individuals in navigating complex inheritance processes and ensuring their rights are upheld throughout the procedure.
2 reports
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago She's been waiting over two years for a decision on the inheritance. What can she do?A reader has contacted a legal advisory service asking what they can do since the inheritance process after their mother's death has been taking over two years, despite the heirs having already reached an inheritance agreement. While similar cases within the family were resolved in just a few months, this case remains unresolved. A lawyer explains why comparing this case to others may not be decisive, what information heirs can obtain from the court, and under what circumstances prolonged decision-making by the court could justify official action. The article provides guidance on how to request access to court records, formally call the court to make a decision, and when it might be appropriate to file a supervisory complaint due to the lengthy duration of the inheritance process.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a legal procedure related to inheritance and does not present any overtly biased language, framing, or sourcing. It provides general legal advice and explanations without favoring any particular side or ideology.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): This article aligns closely with the primary source, explaining the prolonged inheritance process and offering guidance from a lawyer. It maintains an objective tone by focusing on legal procedures rather than taking sides.
Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago Mother died two years ago, and the heirs are still waiting. What's going on?The article is a personal inquiry from an individual named Marko who is seeking clarification on the status of his inheritance case after his mother's death in June 2024. He has not received any communication from the probate court despite submitting the inheritance agreement with his brother in January 2025. Marko expresses frustration over the prolonged process, noting that another family member’s inheritance matter was resolved more quickly. The response provided by 'Pravnik na Dlani' outlines steps he can take to expedite the process, including sending a written request to the court, requesting access to the court file, and potentially filing a complaint if the delay is deemed unreasonable.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a legal procedure related to inheritance, which is a civil matter rather than a politically charged issue. While the topic involves legal processes and potential delays, there is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on partisan perspectives. The advice provided remains fact
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately reflects the primary source document by discussing the delay in the inheritance process and providing practical steps like sending a written request to the court. It remains objective by presenting the situation without emotional language.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter