The exclusion of Branko Grimes was also reacted by Jan Janša: "The picture is not black and white! "

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 99Objective 908 days ago

The article discusses the exclusion of Branko Grims from the European People's Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament, which has raised questions about his future political role and revealed internal divisions within the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS). The EPP officially justified Grims' exclusion, while reactions from figures like Janez Janša, Roman Tomc, and Milan Zver were noted. Irena Joveva and Marjan Šarec called for broader discussions on SDS membership in the EPP. Former European parliamentarian Mihael Brejc commented on Grims' political development, and the piece also references past cases of political exclusions in the European Parliament.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives and does not exhibit clear bias toward any side. It reports on the exclusion of a politician and includes various viewpoints from different individuals involved, maintaining a balanced approach.

Why factuality (99): The article provides a comprehensive overview of the situation, including the reasons behind Grims' exclusion and reactions from various figures. It aligns closely with other sources and offers a balanced analysis.

Why objectivity (90): The article remains largely objective, presenting multiple perspectives and focusing on analysis rather than taking sides, though it may lean slightly toward explaining the political dynamics within SDS.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 97Objective 859 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, has expelled Branko Grims, an MEP representing the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS). The decision was approved by 131 members, with seven voting against and seven abstaining. Grims had previously been restricted from acting on behalf of EPP since January due to alleged poor work ethic and continuous actions contrary to conservative and European values. He stated he would continue his parliamentary duties and announced candidacy for the next European elections. Three Slovenian EPP MEPs from SDS expressed regret over the expulsion, stating they voted against it and remain committed to representing SDS's positions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the expulsion decision as a formal process with balanced reporting of votes (131 in favor, 7 against, 7 abstentions). It includes statements from both supporters and opponents of the expulsion, including Grims himself and the three Slovenian MEPs from SDS who opposed it. There's

Why factuality (97): The article accurately describes the voting results and the official reasons for Branko Grims' exclusion from EPP. It aligns with other sources confirming these facts.

Why objectivity (85): The article is factual but lacks depth in exploring the political ramifications or personal impact on Grims and the broader implications for SDS and EPP.

Nova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 97Objective 828 days ago

The article discusses the exclusion of Slovenian politician Branko Grims from the European People's Party (EPP) parliamentary group. Prime Minister Janez Janša expresses regret over the decision, stating it was the third attempt to remove Grims from the group. He argues that the issue is not primarily about content but about fairness, noting that EPP is a confederation of national parties rather than a single national party. Janša emphasizes that many members of the EPP, including representatives from major EU countries, have taken stronger positions on issues like migration, safety, and green transition compared to Grims. He criticizes the current majority-formed opinions within the EPP as being less balanced than before, suggesting that such actions hinder the formation of good compromises. Janša also highlights that the exclusion was supported by 131 MEPs, with only seven Slovenian votes against, urging self-criticism among those who voted for the strict measure.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the exclusion of Branko Grims as a significant setback for the SDS (Slovenian Democratic Party), which aligns with left-leaning perspectives. The emphasis on fairness, criticism of 'right-wing' policies, and the portrayal of EPP as a multi-national confederation suggest a leftward

Why factuality (97): The article accurately summarizes Janez Janša's comments on the exclusion of Branko Grims from EPP, including his criticism of the fairness of the process and the diversity of views within EPP. This aligns with other sources reporting similar sentiments.

Why objectivity (82): The article leans slightly in favor of Janša and SDS by highlighting their arguments against the exclusion while not giving equal weight to EPP's rationale for the action.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 8013 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP) in the European Parliament has reportedly decided to exclude Branko Grims, a member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), due to concerns over his work ethic. This decision was confirmed by sources within the European Parliament. The Left Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) in the European Parliament welcomed this move, noting that Grims is a close ally of Prime Minister Janez Janša. They argued that the EPP should consider excluding the entire SDS faction, as they believe the party is being pushed further to the right by far-right elements within its ranks. In response, Janša criticized their comments, calling them insignificant and saying they would soon be forgotten.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the EPP's decision to exclude Grims and the S&D's criticism of the SDS, followed by Janša's dismissive response. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing, and the content remains balanced between the parties involved.

Why factuality (97): The article accurately reports the exclusion of Branko Grims from EPP and mentions the reaction from the S&D group. It aligns with other sources confirming these events.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the S&D group's perspective but lacks balance by not providing a detailed response from EPP or Janša beyond his brief comment.

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 96Objective 807 days ago

Evropska poslanka Romana Tomc je na Facebooku objavila zapis o izključitvi Branka Grimsa iz skupine EPP (Evropska ljudska stranka). V zapisu opominja, da so bile grožnje in laži, ki so bile usmerjene proti njej, posebno skrbive. Tomčeva meni, da je izključitev Grimsa bila zaslužena zaradi njegovih nekorektnega ravnanja v skupini, manjkovanja sodelovanja in neupoštevanja osnovnih pravil. Poudarja, da je Grims nekoriščen člen skupine, ki ni zagovarjal svojih stališč znotraj skupine, in da je zato izključen. Dodatno navaja, da je Grims javno izrazil nezadovoljstvo z članstvom SDS v EPP, kar je povzročilo uporabe v skupini. Predlog je, da bi Grims v primeru izključitve odstopal kot evropski poslanec, tako da bi se ne izgubilo mesto v EPP, in da bi ga nadomestil Aleš Hojs.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel emphasizes the internal disciplinary actions within EPP against Grims, highlighting his lack of cooperation and ethical behavior. The framing suggests that his exclusion was justified due to professional conduct rather than ideological differences, aligning more with left-leaning values of问责

Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports Romana Tomc's concerns about false accusations and threats directed at her, along with her explanation of Grims' exclusion due to lack of cooperation and ethical issues. These points are corroborated by other sources.

Why objectivity (80): The article has a clear bias in favor of EPP and Tomc, using emotionally charged language like 'threats' and 'false accusations' without presenting Grims' defense or alternative perspectives.

MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 8010 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, has voted to expel Branko Grims, a far-right MEP representing Slovenia (EPP/SDS). The vote passed with 131 members in favor, seven against, and seven abstentions. This decision follows confirmation from the EPP leadership that Grims had been acting against the party’s values and principles since January. His expulsion was based on allegations of poor work ethic and continuous actions contrary to conservative and European values, with critics stating he does not contribute to the group’s objectives but rather works against them.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the expulsion of Branko Grims as a formal decision by the EPP, citing specific reasons such as poor work ethic and actions against party values. While the EPP is a right-leaning political group, the article remains neutral in tone, presenting the facts without overtly endorsing或

Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports the voting results and the official reasons for Branko Grims' exclusion from EPP. It aligns with other sources confirming these facts.

Why objectivity (80): The article is factual but lacks depth in exploring the political ramifications or personal impact on Grims and the broader implications for SDS and EPP.

Info360IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament voted almost unanimously to expel Slovenian MEP Branko Grims. The vote received 131 votes in favor, with no opposition from Matej Tonin of NSI. Grims has stated he does not intend to resign and will continue his work in the European Parliament, while also announcing his candidacy for the next European elections. He has rejected calls from his SDS colleague Romana Tomc to step down.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event objectively, detailing the unanimous expulsion decision, the number of votes, and Grims' response without overtly criticizing or praising either side. It includes quotes from Grims but does not frame them as biased commentary. The focus remains on the procedural and的政治

Why factuality (95): The article provides precise information about the voting results and the decision-making process surrounding Grims' exclusion. It is highly aligned with the cross-source consensus and includes direct statements from relevant individuals.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective tone throughout, presenting facts without apparent bias. It focuses on reporting events as they occurred without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.

DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP), part of the European Parliament, has unanimously expelled Slovenian MEP Branko Grims from its group. Out of 131 members who voted for expulsion, only seven opposed, including four Slovenian MEPs. The decision followed formal confirmation by the EPP leadership, which accused Grims of poor work ethics and actions against conservative and European values. He was criticized for collaborating with far-right groups, organizing events contrary to EPP principles, and supporting a rival party during parliamentary elections. Despite appeals from some colleagues, Grims intends to remain in his position.

Bias read (Center): While the expulsion of Branko Grims is a politically charged issue, the article presents the decision as a formal process based on internal rules and accusations of misconduct. It includes both the majority support for expulsion and the minority opposition, with quotes from those who disagreed. The

Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the exclusion of Branko Grims from EPP, including the voting numbers and the reasons cited. It aligns with other sources and provides detailed background on the situation.

Why objectivity (90): The article is very objective, focusing on factual reporting without showing clear bias. It presents the situation neutrally, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions based on the presented facts.

DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 909 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, has voted to expel its member Branko Grims, a Slovenian MEP. The decision was expected after the EPP leadership had already confirmed the expulsion earlier in the week. Grims did not express surprise at the outcome and stated his continued loyalty to his voters and values. He denied the allegations against him, including accusations of poor work ethic and alignment with far-right groups such as Europe of Sovereign Nations and support for policies promoted by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. Grims explained that his positions on issues like protecting children from LGBTQ+ ideology, freedom of speech, migration control, and reducing bureaucratic hurdles were the reasons behind the expulsion. Despite being expelled from the EPP, Grims remains an MEP and has not ruled out running in future elections. Janez Janša, leader of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), commented that Grims had not violated any rules within the SDS, as he is not a member of the parliamentary group but rather part of the EPP.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the EPP's justification for expelling Grims and his rebuttal, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Grims and mentions the stance of Janez Janša, indicating an attempt to cover multiple viewpoints fairly.

Why factuality (95): The article provides accurate information about the exclusion of Branko Grims from EPP, including the voting numbers and the reasons cited. It aligns with other sources and includes direct statements from relevant individuals.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective tone throughout, presenting facts without apparent bias. It focuses on reporting events as they occurred without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 909 days ago

Premier Janez Janša je izrazil upanje, da bo evropski poslanec Branko Grims ostal v politični skupini Evropske ljudske stranke (EPP), kljiv na odločitev, ki jo bo EPP sprejela danes. Grims je bil pred letom izključen iz slovenske demokratične stranke (SDS) zaradi pomanjkljive delovne etike in delovanja proti desnosredinskim in evropskim vrednotam. EPP je potrdila izključitev Grimsa, kar bo zdaj predstavljeno na tajnem glasovanju v Evropskem parlamentu. Janša meni, da Grims ima v EPP veliko prijateljev in da njegova izjava o prijateljstvu ne bo povzročila njegovega izključenja.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: Premier Janša expresses hope that Grims remains in EPP, while EPP has already confirmed his expulsion based on internal violations. The tone remains balanced, presenting statements from both Janša and EPP without overtly favoring either side. There is no

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Premier Janša's statements about hoping Branko Grims won't be excluded from EPP, citing his comments about Grims having many friends in EPP. It also includes details about EPP's internal rules and the upcoming vote. The information aligns with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (90): The article presents facts neutrally, quoting Janša directly and providing context about EPP's actions. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though it does frame Janša's hope as a political stance.

ReporterIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 909 days ago

The Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Janša commented on the potential expulsion of Drago Grims from the European People's Party (EPP), stating he hopes it does not happen. Grims has reportedly claimed he has many friends within the EPP and that his words should hold weight. Janša emphasized that Grims did not violate the rules of Slovenia's Democratic Party (SDS), as he is not part of the parliamentary group but rather the EPP faction in the European Parliament. The EPP accuses Grims of poor work ethics and actions against conservative and European values, suggesting he works against the interests of the political group. The EPP leadership confirmed Grims' expulsion last week, and today a secret vote by the EPP political group in Strasbourg will decide whether to support this decision.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the perspective of Prime Minister Janša, who defends Grims and frames the situation as a matter of internal EPP rules rather than serious violations. The language used suggests alignment with conservative values and implies criticism of the EPP's actions, which aligns with a pro

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Janša's statements and the situation surrounding Grims' potential exclusion from EPP. It includes relevant details about EPP's internal rules and the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (90): The article remains largely neutral, presenting facts without overt bias or emotional language. However, it frames Janša's hope as a political stance rather than an objective statement.

STA – Slovenska tiskovna agencijaState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 9014 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP) leadership has confirmed the expulsion of a member named Grimsa from their group. The decision was made by the EPP presidency, which oversees disciplinary actions within the organization. The article reports this confirmation through STA.si, a Slovenian news agency. No further details about the reasons for the expulsion or any related discussions are provided in the text.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement regarding the expulsion of a member from the EPP without apparent ideological framing or emphasis on specific political perspectives. It remains neutral in tone and does not appear to favor one side over another.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that the EPP leadership confirmed Grims' expulsion from the group. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus that Grims is facing expulsion due to ethical violations and actions contrary to EPP values.

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information neutrally, without overt bias or emotional language. It simply states the confirmation of Grims' expulsion without taking sides or adding subjective commentary.

Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 889 days ago

Prime Minister Janez Janša expressed hope that Branko Grims, a Slovenian MP and member of the European People's Party (EPP), would not be expelled from the EPP. Grims has been accused by the EPP of poor work ethics and acting against conservative and European values, as well as failing to contribute to the group's work. The EPP leadership confirmed last week that Grims would be expelled, and today the EPP group will vote on this decision in secret at a meeting in Strasbourg. Janša noted that Grims did not violate the rules of Slovenia's Democratic Party (SDS), since he is not part of the parliamentary group but rather the EPP in the European Parliament. He emphasized that Grims had stated during a meeting that he has many friends within the EPP.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both Janša's hopes for Grims' retention in the EPP and the accusations against him from the EPP. It includes direct quotes from Janša and mentions the EPP's reasoning for potential expulsion, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Janša's position on Grims' potential exclusion from EPP. It includes relevant details about EPP's internal rules and the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a neutral tone overall but slightly emphasizes the potential consequences of Grims' exclusion, introducing a minor framing bias.

ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 858 days ago

The article discusses the expulsion of Slovenian politician Branko Grims from the European People's Party (EPP) group within the European Parliament. According to the report by Reporter, Grims was expelled twice before, but both times the proposal did not reach formal procedures. The third attempt succeeded, with 131 members voting in favor of his expulsion compared to seven against, mostly Slovenian MPs. Janša, a member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), argues that the issue lies not in the content of Grims' views but in his conduct and disregard for group rules. He criticizes other EPP members who advocate similar or more extreme positions on issues like migration and security, yet fail to engage constructively within their political group. Janša emphasizes that while the expulsion is considered minor for the EPP, it represents a significant loss for SDS, reducing their influence in the European Parliament by a quarter.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents Janša’s perspective that the expulsion is primarily due to procedural violations rather than ideological differences, it does not overtly frame the situation as either strongly left or right leaning. It provides balanced reporting by including both the arguments for and a

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Janša's statements regarding Grims' exclusion from EPP, citing his social media posts and explaining the reasons as related to conduct rather than content. It aligns closely with other sources describing the situation and provides context about EPP's internal dynami

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone by quoting Janša directly and providing background information. However, it leans slightly toward Janša’s perspective by emphasizing his arguments without presenting counterpoints from EPP or Grims.

DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 859 days ago

The article discusses the potential expulsion of Branko Grims, a prominent member of the Slovenian Social Democracy (SDS), from the European People's Party (EPP). The decision stems from internal disciplinary actions within the EPP, which has proposed a resolution to terminate his membership. This follows a meeting where several SDS leaders, including Roman Tomc, urged Grims to resign as an EU parliamentarian. SDS leader Janez Janša expressed hope that Grims would remain in the EPP, citing his many friends within the group and asserting that he has not violated SDS rules. Critics from other political groups, such as Sloboda/Renew, argue that the focus on Grims seems disproportionate, especially since his positions align with SDS's official stance. They suggest that the issue reflects broader strategic and ideological behavior by SDS, which systematically undermines EPP partner parties.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents the position of SDS leadership, particularly Janša, who supports Grims, it also includes critical perspectives from other political figures like Irene Jove and Marjan Šarc. These critics highlight perceived inconsistencies and broader implications of SDS’s actions, which a

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Janša's position and the situation regarding Grims' possible exclusion from EPP. It includes additional context about the proposed motion and the role of Romana Tomc. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article shows some bias through the inclusion of quotes from Irene Joveva and Marjan Šarc, suggesting a critical view of Grims' actions. This adds a slight leaning towards one perspective.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 859 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, is set to vote on whether to expel MEP Branko Grims from the group. The decision follows an official confirmation by the EPP leadership last week. Grims, a member of Slovenia's Democratic Party (SDS), faces allegations of poor work ethic and actions contrary to conservative and European values. He has responded by stating he works hard and achieves results, suggesting the accusations are unfounded. The EPP has already limited his activities within the group since January. The vote will take place in secret during a meeting in Strasbourg alongside the European Parliament's plenary session.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the allegations against Grims and his rebuttal without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the formal process of potential expulsion and includes direct quotes from Grims, providing balanced coverage of the situation.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the situation regarding Grims' potential exclusion from EPP and includes relevant details about the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article shows some bias through the inclusion of Grims' response, which may subtly influence the reader's perception of the situation.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 859 days ago

The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, is set to vote today on whether to expel Slovenian MEP Branko Grims from the group. The decision follows an official confirmation by the EPP presidency last week. Grims, a member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), has been accused of poor work ethics and acting against conservative and European values. His actions are said to undermine the group’s mission rather than support it. In response, Grims stated that while he acknowledges working less, he believes his efforts have led to tangible successes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: the accusations against Grims and his rebuttal. It does not overtly favor one side over the other, though the framing leans slightly toward the formal process and institutional accountability. There is no clear ideological slant in the language used to描述

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the situation regarding Grims' potential exclusion from EPP and includes relevant details about the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article shows some bias through the inclusion of Grims' response, which may subtly influence the reader's perception of the situation.

ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 859 days ago

The European Parliament's largest political group, EPP, is set to vote today on a proposal to expel Branko Grims, a Slovenian MP from the SDS party, during a secret ballot at a meeting in Strasbourg. The decision is expected to pass, as the group has already officially confirmed the expulsion earlier this week. Grims, who has been restricted in his activities within EPP since January, faces accusations of poor work ethic and actions contrary to right-wing and European values. He has responded by stating that he does not see the issue as underperformance but rather as being criticized for working hard and achieving results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the accusations against Grims and his response without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the formal process of expulsion from a major political group and includes direct quotes from Grims himself, providing balanced coverage of the situation.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the situation regarding Grims' potential exclusion from EPP and includes relevant details about the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article shows some bias through the inclusion of Grims' response, which may subtly influence the reader's perception of the situation.

ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8510 days ago

Romana Tomc, vodja nacionalne delegacije Slovenije v Evropskem parlamentu in podpredsednica politične skupine EPP, je predlagala Romelu Grimsu, da odstopi kot evropski poslanec, z namenom zaščite interesov stranke SDS. To je storila pred sredinim sestankom 185-članske politične skupine EPP, kjer bodo odločali o predlogu izključitve Grimsa iz skupine. Tomc je poudarila, da je večkrat zagovarjala Grimsa na sestankih in poudarila, da ne bo izključitev vplivala na odnos med EPP in SDS. Manfred Weber, vodja EPP, je pohvalil prispevek SDS v okviru EPP, vendar ni komentiral razlogov za izključitev Grimsa, saj je to opisal kot notranjo zadevo EPP. Predsedstvo EPP je že uradno potrdilo izključitev Grimsa, in celotna politična skupina EPP bo o tem odločila na tajnem glasovanju. Grims pa je v svojem odzivu na družbenih omrežjih poudaril, da je moteče, da deluje veliko in dosegne uspehe.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: Romana Tomc's proposal for Grims to resign in order to protect SDS interests, and Grims' counterargument that he is working hard and achieving results. The article includes quotes from both parties involved and does not show clear favoritism toward either side

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the situation regarding Grims' potential exclusion from EPP and includes relevant details about the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article shows some bias through the inclusion of Grims' response, which may subtly influence the reader's perception of the situation.

VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8510 days ago

Evropska poslanka Romana Tomc iz SDS je pred predlogom izključitve poslanca Branka Grimsa iz politične skupine EPP predlagala, da Grims odstopi kot evropski poslanec, z namenom zaščite interesov SDS. Pojasnila je, da bi izguba poslanca bila velika škoda za stranko. Tomc je ponovno obžalovala, da so stvari pripeljale do predloga za izključitev Grimsa, kar je oporeknila z izjava, da ga je večkrat zagovarjala. Manfred Weber, vodja EPP, je pohvalil prispevek SDS, a dejal, da gre za 'notranjo zadevo'. Grims je v odzivu na družbene omrežja zapisal, da je moteče, da delam veliko in dosegam uspehe.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel podpira pozicijo SDS in Romane Tomc, ki predlaga odstop Grimsa za zaščito interesov stranke. Uporaba izraza kot 'velika škoda' in 'zagovarjal' poudarja zaščito SDS, medtem ko se osredotoča na interno politiko EPP. Sicer je Manfred Weber pohvalil SDS, a njegova izjava je bila bolj neutralna.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the situation regarding Grims' potential exclusion from EPP and includes relevant details about the upcoming vote. All claims align with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article shows some bias through the inclusion of Grims' response, which may subtly influence the reader's perception of the situation.