ON
← Back to feed
At the Hajduk Assembly, there was talk of Poljud again: "You can't play there if the wind is stronger than 70 km / h".
Croatia🏛️ Politics6 days ago

At the Hajduk Assembly, there was talk of Poljud again: "You can't play there if the wind is stronger than 70 km / h".

At Hajduk's main shareholders' meeting, discussions focused on the club's infrastructure, particularly the stadium at Poljud. The club faces challenges regarding the stadium's condition, including concerns over wind speeds exceeding 70 km/h making play unsafe. President Ivan Bilić informed shareholders that approximately 50% of the stadium's lexan panels have been replaced and that a comprehensive study by Professor Mihanović has been submitted to the Ministry. The study aims to assess risks related to wind conditions and ensure safety standards. While some members advocate for demolishing Poljud and building a new stadium on the same site, others prefer preserving Poljud and constructing a new stadium elsewhere. Until this issue is resolved, Hajduk remains at Poljud, which requires significant maintenance. Additionally, plans include renovating the auxiliary field and preparing an idea project for a training camp in Stobreč.

At the recent general meeting of Hajduk's shareholders, discussions once again turned to the topic of the Poljud stadium, highlighting ongoing concerns about its condition and usability under certain weather conditions. The meeting took place amid a period of turbulence for the club, as stakeholders gathered to discuss financial matters, performance outcomes, and the current status of player Marko Livaja. However, one of the most pressing issues raised was the state of the stadium itself, particularly regarding safety and infrastructure.

The conversation around the future of the stadium has been ongoing, with differing opinions on whether to demolish Poljud and build a new stadium on the same site or preserve Poljud while constructing a new venue elsewhere. For now, Hajduk remains at Poljud, but the stadium's condition is described as deteriorating and costly to maintain. During the meeting, President Ivan Bilić addressed these concerns directly, providing insight into the current situation and the steps being taken to assess the stadium’s viability.

Bilić informed shareholders that approximately 50% of the lexan panels on the stadium roof have been replaced so far. He mentioned that the club had aimed to complete this work within eight months, which he believed was still achievable. In addition, the club has engaged Professor Mihanović's firm to conduct a comprehensive study of the stadium's condition. This study, however, faced challenges in obtaining necessary reviews due to difficulties in securing three reviewers. Despite this, the documentation related to the study has already been submitted to the Ministry of Sports.

A working group visited the stadium two weeks prior to the meeting, during which they were presented with all relevant documents. Bilić emphasized that ensuring the stadium's safety is of utmost importance, noting that the club has received a license from the Croatian Football Association for the upcoming season. According to Mihanović's findings, there are limitations on the stadium's use based on wind speed, specifically stating that football matches cannot be played when winds exceed 70 kilometers per hour. To address this concern, the club has ordered devices to measure wind speeds accurately, aiming to mitigate risks associated with high winds.

Beyond the stadium, Bilić also outlined other infrastructure projects currently underway. Plans include the renovation of the auxiliary field, divided into two phases. Regarding the training complex, the club has commissioned a company to prepare an initial project plan for a facility in Stobreč, with hopes of completing this by the end of the year. These developments reflect the club's commitment to improving both its sporting and operational environments.

The discussion surrounding Poljud underscores the broader challenges facing Hajduk as it navigates between maintaining its historic home ground and exploring modernization efforts. While some members advocate for preserving Poljud, others see the need for a new stadium to ensure long-term sustainability and safety. As these debates continue, the club remains focused on addressing immediate concerns while planning for the future. With the submission of the stadium assessment to the ministry and the initiation of new projects, the path forward appears to involve collaboration with local authorities and continued investment in infrastructure improvements.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrIndependentCenter6 days ago
At the Hajduk Assembly, there was talk of Poljud again: "You can't play there if the wind is stronger than 70 km / h".

At Hajduk's main shareholders' meeting, discussions focused on the club's infrastructure, particularly the stadium at Poljud. The club faces challenges regarding the stadium's condition, including concerns over wind speeds exceeding 70 km/h making play unsafe. President Ivan Bilić informed shareholders that approximately 50% of the stadium's lexan panels have been replaced and that a comprehensive study by Professor Mihanović has been submitted to the Ministry. The study aims to assess risks related to wind conditions and ensure safety standards. While some members advocate for demolishing Poljud and building a new stadium on the same site, others prefer preserving Poljud and constructing a new stadium elsewhere. Until this issue is resolved, Hajduk remains at Poljud, which requires significant maintenance. Additionally, plans include renovating the auxiliary field and preparing an idea project for a training camp in Stobreč.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the discussion at Hajduk's shareholders' meeting, presenting both perspectives on the stadium's future without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the president and mentions ongoing efforts to address infrastructure issues, indicating

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories