ON
← Back to feed
My Relative Keeps Bringing Up a Vile Part of Our Family’s History. I’d Rather This Stay Buried.
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

My Relative Keeps Bringing Up a Vile Part of Our Family’s History. I’d Rather This Stay Buried.

The article addresses a reader's concern about an older family member repeatedly bringing up the family's history of owning slaves during gatherings. The reader feels uncomfortable with these discussions and wishes the topic would remain buried. In response, the columnist, Jenée Desmond-Harris, advises against simply dismissing the issue. Instead, she encourages the reader to acknowledge the historical reality and engage thoughtfully with the topic, emphasizing that understanding and confronting difficult histories is important in today's society. She acknowledges the emotional weight of such discussions but argues that avoiding them risks perpetuating ignorance, especially in light of ongoing debates about race and history.

A family member's repeated references to a dark chapter in their ancestry have sparked unease among others in the extended family, particularly regarding the legacy of slavery within their lineage. The issue has resurfaced during recent gatherings, prompting discussions that many would prefer to avoid. The individual, referred to as "Still Mortified," expressed concern over how to handle these conversations, especially with younger relatives who might inquire about the past. They seek guidance on addressing the uncomfortable truth of their family's history while maintaining familial harmony. The conversation began when the relative brought up the topic of ancestral slave ownership during a family reunion. This revelation stirred feelings of discomfort and embarrassment among some attendees, including Still Mortified. The family's response varied, with some dismissing the historical context as merely a part of the past, while others found it equally distressing. The challenge lies in navigating these discussions without causing further rifts or reinforcing negative sentiments towards the shared heritage. As the family continues to grapple with this aspect of their history, the need for open dialogue becomes apparent. While some members advocate for acknowledging the painful truths, others remain hesitant due to fear of conflict or misunderstanding. The tension arises from the desire to confront the past while preserving family unity. This delicate balance requires careful consideration of each family member's perspective and emotional state. In light of these challenges, experts suggest that engaging with the history does not necessarily mean embracing the actions of ancestors but rather understanding the broader implications of such legacies. By exploring the narratives of both slaveholders and those who were enslaved, families can foster a more comprehensive view of their heritage. This approach allows for reflection on how historical injustices have shaped present realities, encouraging empathy and education rather than mere avoidance. The role of external resources and community support becomes crucial in facilitating these discussions. Initiatives like the Beyond Kin Project aim to connect descendants of slaveholders with those whose ancestors were enslaved, promoting healing through shared knowledge and mutual understanding. Such efforts highlight the importance of confronting difficult histories collectively, ensuring that lessons learned contribute positively to future generations. As the family contemplates its path forward, the emphasis shifts towards creating spaces where these conversations can occur safely and constructively. Whether through formal discussions or informal exchanges, the goal is to transform discomfort into curiosity and learning. By doing so, the family can honor the complexities of their past while forging a more inclusive narrative for the future.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Slate logoSlateIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 65yesterday
My Relative Keeps Bringing Up a Vile Part of Our Family’s History. I’d Rather This Stay Buried.

The article addresses a reader's concern about an older family member repeatedly bringing up the family's history of owning slaves during gatherings. The reader feels uncomfortable with these discussions and wishes the topic would remain buried. In response, the columnist, Jenée Desmond-Harris, advises against simply dismissing the issue. Instead, she encourages the reader to acknowledge the historical reality and engage thoughtfully with the topic, emphasizing that understanding and confronting difficult histories is important in today's society. She acknowledges the emotional weight of such discussions but argues that avoiding them risks perpetuating ignorance, especially in light of ongoing debates about race and history.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discussion around acknowledging historical injustices and engaging with complex family legacies, aligning more closely with progressive values that emphasize truth-telling and social accountability. While not overtly partisan, the emphasis on confronting uncomfortable truths,

Why factuality (85): The article discusses a personal letter about dealing with family history related to slavery, but does not reference the Descendants Truth and Reconciliation Foundation or its primary source document. It focuses on individual family dynamics and personal feelings rather than the broader reconciliati

Why objectivity (65): The tone of the article is subjective and emotionally charged, focusing on the personal distress of the letter writer. It presents a personal perspective without attempting to provide balanced viewpoints or contextual information about the historical issue.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories