Americans are facing a growing challenge in retirement that remains largely unspoken: the process of managing and spending their accumulated savings, known as "decumulation." While many individuals dedicate significant effort to saving for retirement, relatively few have developed detailed strategies for how to spend that money once they stop working. According to recent research from Corebridge Financial, only 31% of Americans are familiar with the concept of decumulation, highlighting a widespread gap in financial planning knowledge among retirees.
The issue becomes even more pressing when considering the findings of a May report from the Employee Benefit Research Institute, which revealed that one-third of retirees still had 100% or more of their initial retirement assets by their mid-80s. This suggests that a substantial number of retirees are under-spending due to fears of outliving their savings. Jean Chatzky, a personal finance expert and co-founder of the website HerMoney, emphasized that having a clear plan for spending down retirement savings is just as crucial as the plan for accumulating those funds. She noted that developing such a plan can lead to a more enjoyable and empowering retirement experience.
Corebridge's survey, which included 2,210 adults aged 45 to 79 with over $100,000 in investable assets, further underscored the importance of financial planning in retirement. The study found that only 29% of workers aged 55 and older had a plan for withdrawing money from their retirement accounts. Additionally, 56% of respondents expressed concern about running out of money before death, compared to only 6% who feared dying with leftover funds. Bryan Pinsky, president of individual retirement and life insurance at Corebridge, highlighted the need for proactive planning, stating that taking action allows retirees to enjoy the lifestyle they have worked toward.
Retirees face several financial challenges, including the rising costs of healthcare and the effects of inflation on purchasing power. These concerns often lead to reduced spending despite available resources. Traditional retirement planning strategies, such as the widely referenced "4% rule," suggest that retirees can safely withdraw 4% of their savings annually, adjusting for inflation. However, experts argue that this approach does not fully account for variables like market fluctuations, investment fees, and extended lifespans. As a result, many are exploring alternative methods to ensure financial security during retirement.
Younger generations, particularly those without access to traditional pensions, are increasingly turning to self-directed savings plans like 401(k)s. Despite this shift, studies show that retirees with pension income tend to report higher levels of financial stability. Consequently, some experts recommend incorporating guaranteed income streams, such as annuities, into retirement portfolios to mitigate the risk of outliving savings. Pinsky emphasized the importance of maintaining growth in retirement savings while keeping pace with inflation, noting that guaranteed-income products can provide essential financial support and reduce anxiety about future financial security.
In addition to financial planning, discussions around wealth distribution and estate planning are gaining attention. Individuals with substantial savings are contemplating how best to pass on their wealth to future generations while ensuring it is managed responsibly. Strategies range from making structured gifts to setting up trusts that provide ongoing support without overwhelming beneficiaries. These considerations reflect broader societal shifts regarding intergenerational financial responsibility and the desire to balance legacy with immediate familial needs.
7 reports
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7018 days agoThe article discusses the mandatory tax implications of Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) for retirees, highlighting the inevitability of paying taxes on these withdrawals from retirement accounts. It suggests strategies for individuals to manage their retirement savings effectively while navigating the tax requirements.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on financial planning related to retirement taxes, which is primarily an economic issue with limited direct political controversy. The content appears neutral, providing general advice without overtly favoring any particular political perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article discusses RMDs and tax implications but presents it as a problem with a solution, suggesting a biased approach. Factually accurate based on general knowledge of retirement accounts.
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7021 days ago Scared to spend your retirement money? Here’s one way to get over the fear of running out.The article discusses the fear of running out of money during retirement and suggests ways to overcome this concern.
Bias read (Center): The article addresses financial planning for retirement without taking a political stance. It focuses on personal finance strategies rather than policy or partisan issues.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Talks about fear of spending retirement money and suggests ways to overcome it. Based on common financial planning principles, but leans toward promoting specific solutions.
SlateIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7021 days agoA reader is considering how to distribute their wealth to their adult children before passing away, taking into account their different financial situations. The reader is concerned about whether their stepson, who already has a stable job and savings, would responsibly handle a large sum, versus their daughter, who has a creative career and a mild disability that may affect her ability to work traditional jobs. The reader has already helped their daughter start managing money through a Vanguard account.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses personal financial planning and estate distribution without taking a stance on political issues. It presents a neutral scenario regarding family financial management and does not exhibit any ideological framing or bias.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Focuses on planning for travel in retirement and suggests preparation. While factually sound, it promotes a particular mindset towards retirement spending.
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7022 days ago ‘I’m a realist’: I’m 50 with $6.5 million saved. Should I quit my $200,000 job and retire early?A 50-year-old individual with $6.5 million saved is contemplating quitting their $200,000 job to retire early and focus on trading activities full-time.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a personal financial decision without taking a stance or showing bias toward any political ideology. It focuses on an individual’s choice regarding retirement and trading, which is not inherently politically charged.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Presents a decision between two pension options and includes a personal story. Factual information is accurate, but the narrative is skewed toward one option.
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 9026 days ago I’m 55 and earn $100,000. Should I take a $2,900 monthly pension — or $2,200 with 3% annual hikes?A 55-year-old individual earning $100,000 annually is considering whether to accept a $2,900 monthly pension or a $2,200 pension with a 3% annual increase.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a financial decision without taking a stance on either option. It does not include any biased language, framing, or sourcing that would indicate a particular ideological leaning.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 90): The article poses a specific financial question with no definitive answer. It includes a direct quote from the individual, making it relatively factual and neutral in approach.
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7520 days ago I’m 55 and retiring in 6 years. Should I be switching to Roth 401(k) contributions now?The article discusses whether someone who is 55 and planning to retire in six years should switch to Roth 401(k) contributions. It references a statement from Vanguard indicating that people are still hesitant to participate in Roth plans at work.
Bias read (Center): The article does not present any overtly biased language, framing, or sourcing. It raises a financial question without taking a stance on the issue, and it cites a general observation from Vanguard without attributing it to any particular ideological perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Discusses Roth 401(k) contributions and cites Vanguard as a source, which is reliable. Objectivity is slightly compromised by focusing on one potential action.
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7522 days ago Want to splurge on travel in retirement? Here’s how to plan for it.The article discusses planning for travel expenses during retirement, advising against delaying large trips and emphasizing the importance of early planning.
Bias read (Center): The article provides general financial advice on retirement travel planning without taking a stance on political issues. It does not reference any political entities, policies, or ideological perspectives.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Discusses early retirement considerations and includes a personal anecdote. Cites general financial principles, but the tone is somewhat promotional.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
