MVK proposes to the National Assembly not to grant Golob immunity in the Bobnar case
The Mandate Election Commission (MVK) has proposed to the National Assembly that former Prime Minister Robert Golob does not qualify for immunity in a case involving former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar. Golob has informed the National Assembly president Zoran Stevanović (Resnica) that he will not invoke his immunity or request a decision on its recognition. He also states he will personally vote to deny him immunity and allow criminal proceedings against him. Golob argues that the National Assembly’s decision is unnecessary, as the competent authority is responsible for informing the assembly about initiating a criminal investigation against a member, and the assembly president is tasked with notifying other members and the MKV. Golob claims that if a member is accused of a more serious crime, such as a prison sentence exceeding five years, the court can proceed without the assembly’s approval. The Specialized State Prosecutor (SDT) has informed the assembly and Stevanović that a request for investigation was filed against Golob for alleged misconduct related to Bobnar, including unauthorized interference with police work. Golob denies any wrongdoing and asserts he will prove,
Specialized State Prosecutor Files Charges Against Former Prime Minister Robert Golob On August 31, 2026, the specialized state prosecutor informed President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović that all conditions have been met for initiating criminal proceedings against Robert Golob, leader of the party Sloboda, for allegedly committing the crime of unauthorized giving of gifts for illegal intermediation. The case relates to allegations of interference with police operations, which were initially raised by former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar. Stevanović confirmed the information and stated that the prosecutor has requested a decision from the National Assembly regarding Golob’s parliamentary immunity, which is required before the criminal process can begin. The charges stem from a request filed by the specialized state prosecutor in October 2025 with the Ljubljana City Court, seeking a judicial investigation into Golob over alleged involvement in police affairs. The court must now decide whether to initiate the judicial inquiry, which would trigger the criminal process. However, prior to this, the National Assembly must determine whether Golob is entitled to parliamentary immunity. If the court approves the inquiry, the National Assembly will then assess whether to grant immunity, which could prevent the criminal process from proceeding. Golob's lawyer, Stojan Zdolšek, confirmed to STA that the prosecutor’s notice pertains to the Bobnar case. He noted that Golob has not claimed parliamentary immunity and that the procedure outlined in the National Assembly’s rules applies. Zdolšek emphasized that the prosecutor’s move follows approximately one year after the police issued a criminal complaint against Golob, who was then prime minister. Bobnar had previously accused Golob of interfering with police work, but Golob denied the allegations, and his legal team dismissed the request for a judicial inquiry as unfounded. The National Assembly’s mandate and election commission will review the case in secret session and recommend whether Golob should be granted immunity. This recommendation will be crucial in determining whether the criminal process can proceed. According to Stevanović, the decision will be made within 30 days of the request being submitted. The National Assembly may also consider appeals against the court’s decision to initiate the inquiry. If the court does authorize the judicial inquiry, the National Assembly will then make its final determination on immunity. Should immunity not be granted, the criminal process against Golob could formally commence. The potential consequences for Golob include a maximum prison sentence of six years, given the severity of the alleged offense under Article 264 of the Criminal Code. In addition to the Bobnar case, there are ongoing investigations into alleged attempts to bribe members of the opposition party Resnica. These matters, which date back to late 2022, involve claims of political pressure on police officers and other officials. The National Assembly’s ethics committee has already received reports of such activities, and the police are investigating these allegations through the National Prosecution Office. The situation has drawn attention from both sides of the political spectrum. Opposition figures have expressed support for the prosecution to carry out its duties independently. Tereza Novak, a member of the Sloboda party, commented that the president of her party is among the first to seek clarity and resolution in these matters. She emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability, while noting that the political implications of such cases could influence public perception of the judiciary. Meanwhile, the media continues to monitor developments closely, particularly as the outcome of the National Assembly’s decision could significantly impact Golob’s political future. With the possibility of a criminal process looming, the focus remains on the procedural steps required to ensure due process and uphold the rule of law. The next phase of the proceedings will depend on the National Assembly’s response to the prosecutor’s request and the broader context of ongoing investigations into corruption and abuse of power.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Former Slovenian Prime Minister and leader of the Freedom Movement party, Robert Golob, has shared a video on Facebook revealing who his new 'cimer' (colleague or partner) will be in the parliamentary office. The new 'cimer' is Matej Grah, a member of parliament and general secretary of the Freedom Movement. According to initial impressions, both politicians seem to function well together in the shared office. Grah expressed satisfaction with the choice, stating he would have a good time working with Golob, while Golob humorously remarked that if it remains this fun, they would be in for a pleasant experience. However, they face a challenging political season ahead, which might make things less enjoyable over time. The two have started their collaboration relatively late, as the last parliamentary elections were held on March 22, and the first session of the National Assembly took place in April. Golob continued serving as head of government for some time after that, followed by parliamentary recesses with limited parliamentary activity. Now, Golob and Grah will test how well they understand and work together in the shared office.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on the announcement of Golob's new parliamentary colleague and their initial comments. There is no evident bias in the language used, and the content does not favor one side over another. It provides straightforward information without overtly
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Robert Golob has shared his parliamentary office with Matej Grah, who will now serve as his 'cimer' (colleague or partner). It includes direct quotes from both individuals and provides contextual information about the timing of their collaboration, referencing the
Why objectivity (85): The tone is generally neutral and informative, though there is some light humor in the quotes from Golob and Grah. This does not significantly affect objectivity but adds a slightly informal touch. The article avoids overt bias and presents the situation factually.
The Mandate-Election Commission (MVK) of the National Assembly (DZ) has proposed not recognizing the immunity of Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement, allowing the criminal proceedings against him in the Bobnar case to proceed. Golob has informed the President of the DZ, Zoran Stevanović, and the MVK that he will not invoke his parliamentary immunity and will personally vote against its recognition, aiming to conclude the lengthy pre-criminal process (since 2022) as soon as possible. The specialized state prosecution (SDT) notified Stevanović last week that the conditions for initiating criminal proceedings against Golob are met, allegedly for unlawful gift-giving related to illegal intermediation. Golob’s lawyer confirmed this relates to the Bobnar case.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing both Golob's decision not to claim immunity and the SDT's notification regarding the criminal proceedings. It does not show overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal,宪
The Slovenian parliament is considering whether to revoke the immunity of former Prime Minister Robert Golob, who is currently a member of the Freedom Movement. Golob has stated he does not agree with the parliamentary decision regarding his immunity, arguing that the process is unnecessary and that the relevant authorities should directly inform him and the Mandate and Election Commission (MVK) about the initiation of criminal proceedings against him. The MKV has voted to advise the parliament not to recognize Golob’s immunity, which could allow the criminal case against him to proceed. The case involves allegations of illegal gift-giving by Golob, which could result in up to six years in prison and a fine. Golob claims his actions were in line with expectations of a former prime minister and denies any wrongdoing, asserting that he will prove this before the appropriate court. The issue is part of broader anti-corruption efforts, as a previous investigation found that Golob violated integrity standards during his tenure as prime minister.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate: Golob's defense of his actions and the legal arguments supporting the removal of his immunity. It includes quotes from Golob and reports from the Mandate and Election Commission, providing balanced coverage without overtly favoring either side. The tone
The Slovenian parliament's electoral commission has recommended that the immunity of Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement, be revoked to allow criminal proceedings against him over alleged interference in police operations. The special state prosecutor informed the president of the National Assembly last week that conditions for initiating a criminal case against Golob were met, specifically related to allegations of illegal influence over police work during his time as prime minister. Golob has stated he will not invoke parliamentary immunity and has pledged to vote against the decision. The case, which began in the preliminary phase in 2022, involves accusations of providing bribes for unlawful intervention. His lawyer confirmed the charges relate to former interior minister Tatjana Bobnar. The final decision on the recommendation will be made by parliament during the middle of the session.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally, outlining both the recommendation from the electoral commission and Golob's stance without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the legal process and the implications of revoking parliamentary immunity without taking a clear ideological position.
Robert Golob, predsednik vlade, je v ponedeljek poslal dopis predsedniku Državnega zbora Zorantu Stevanoviću in MVK, v katerem pojasnjuje, da se ne bo skliceval na imuniteto, ker želi, da se kazenski postopek proti njemu čim prej konča. Nastavil je, da je odločitev Državnega zbora o priznanju imunitete nepotrebna, ker je pristojni organ dolžan le obvestiti o začetku postopka. Golob meni, da bi postopek moral začeti tudi brez dovoljenja Državnega zbora, če gre za težje kaznivo dejanje. Specializirano državno tožilstvo je vložilo zahtevo za preiskavo zaradi domnevnega vmešavanja v delo policije, kar je povezano z zadevo Bobnar. Sodišče je pozvalo Državni zbor, naj predloži dovoljenje za nadaljevanje postopka, ker je Golob v tej fazi poslanec.
Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje formalno sporočilo predsednika vlade o svojem stališču glede imunitete in sodnega postopka, brez izražanja močne politične stranske podpore. Vsebinsko je neutralen, sicer pa vključuje pomembne politične elemente, kot so sodni postopi in imuniteta, kar kaže na visoko politično vlogo.
The Mandate Election Commission (MVK) has proposed to the National Assembly that former Prime Minister Robert Golob does not qualify for immunity in a case involving former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar. Golob has informed the National Assembly president Zoran Stevanović (Resnica) that he will not invoke his immunity or request a decision on its recognition. He also states he will personally vote to deny him immunity and allow criminal proceedings against him. Golob argues that the National Assembly’s decision is unnecessary, as the competent authority is responsible for informing the assembly about initiating a criminal investigation against a member, and the assembly president is tasked with notifying other members and the MKV. Golob claims that if a member is accused of a more serious crime, such as a prison sentence exceeding five years, the court can proceed without the assembly’s approval. The Specialized State Prosecutor (SDT) has informed the assembly and Stevanović that a request for investigation was filed against Golob for alleged misconduct related to Bobnar, including unauthorized interference with police work. Golob denies any wrongdoing and asserts he will prove,
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: Golob's position that immunity should not apply and the legal basis for the prosecutor's actions. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing, as the report remains neutral in presenting the arguments from both Golob and the authorities involved.
The President of the National Assembly (DZ), Zoran Stevanović, has informed Prime Minister Janez Golob that he will not invoke parliamentary immunity or request the DZ to decide on its recognition. Instead, Golob stated he would vote against recognizing his immunity and support initiating criminal proceedings against himself at the competent court. He emphasized that he wants the lengthy pre-criminal process (since 2022) to conclude as soon as possible. Since Golob does not intend to claim immunity, he finds the DZ’s decision on whether to initiate criminal proceedings against him unnecessary. The Specialized State Prosecution (SDT) previously notified Stevanović last week that the conditions for starting criminal proceedings against Golob are met, allegedly for illegal gift-giving related to unauthorized mediation. Both Stevanović and SDT confirmed this on Monday. Golob’s attorney, Stojan Zdolšek, later confirmed via STA that the prosecution notice relates to the Bobnar case.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, quoting both Golob and Stevanović, along with confirmation from the SDT and Golob’s lawyer. There is no evident framing favoring one side over another, and the content remains balanced in tone and sourcing.
The Slovenian parliament (DZ) is set to decide whether to recognize the immunity of Robert Golob, a member of the Freedom Movement party, who faces a criminal investigation related to the Bobnar case. The mandate-election commission (MVK) has recommended that the DZ does not recognize Golob’s immunity, allowing the criminal proceedings to proceed. Golob had previously informed both the president of the DZ and the MVK that he would not invoke his immunity or request a decision from the DZ regarding it. He argues that the criminal process should begin immediately, as he believes the conditions for prosecution have been met. The specialized state prosecutor has informed the DZ president that the necessary conditions for initiating the criminal proceedings against Golob have been fulfilled, based on allegations of illegal interference in police operations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the positions of both the mandate-election commission and Robert Golob without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the legal arguments and procedural steps taken by both parties, maintaining a balanced tone. There is no clear ideological leaning toward either the ruling党
The Slovenian Parliament's Mandate-Election Commission (MVK) has proposed that Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement, does not qualify for parliamentary immunity, allowing a criminal investigation into his alleged involvement in illegal intermediation through donations. Golob has informed the National Assembly that he will not invoke his immunity and will personally vote against its recognition. The proposal stems from a request by the specialized state prosecutor, which alleges that Golob committed a criminal offense under Article 264(2) of the Criminal Code. Golob claims that the situation warrants immediate legal action without requiring the National Assembly’s approval, especially if the alleged crime involves imprisonment exceeding five years. He asserts that his actions were in line with expected responsibilities as Prime Minister and denies any criminal conduct.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: Golob's defense of his actions and the commission's proposal to strip him of immunity. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing, and the language remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects of the legal process rather than taking a side
The article discusses the ongoing legal proceedings against Robert Golob, the leader of the Freedom Party and former Prime Minister of Slovenia, related to alleged misconduct by former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar. The specialized state prosecution has determined that conditions are met to initiate criminal proceedings against Golob, which could result in up to six years in prison. The article raises questions about why Golob has not left politics despite previous promises to do so if found guilty of integrity violations by the Commission for Integrity. It also explores whether his parliamentary immunity will be challenged before a potential court investigation begins. Additionally, the piece speculates on which current politicians might face similar legal challenges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal situation involving a prominent politician without overtly favoring any side. It outlines the charges, the potential implications, and raises questions without taking a clear stance or using biased language.
Poslanec Robert Golob je v pismu predsedniku državnega zbora Zoranu Stevanoviću poudaril, da se v preiskavi zadeve Bobnar ni skliceval na svojo imuniteto in se v prihodnje tudi ne bo. To pismo je poslal včeraj pred predlogom odločitve o začetku kazenskega postopka proti njemu, ki ga Specializirano državno tožilstvo (SDT) ocenjuje kot opravljal kaznivo dejanje – dajanje daril za nezakonito posredovanje. SDT je obvestilo Stevanovića, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za sodno preiskavo, kar je povzročilo zahtevko državnega zbora za odločitev o imuniteti. MVK bo obravnavala zadevo na zaprti seji in predlagala odločitev, ali naj se Golobu prizna imuniteta ali ne, kar bi vplivalo na začetek kazenskega postopka.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings against Robert Golob, detailing both his claims regarding immunity and the actions taken by the Specialized State Prosecutor (SDT) and the parliamentary mandate-election commission (MVK). The framing remains neutral, focusing on the事实和
The Slovenian National Assembly (DZ) is preparing to decide whether to grant parliamentary immunity to Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement party, in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation into alleged illegal gift-giving related to the Bobnar case. The Specialized State Prosecution (SDT) has informed the President of the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, that the conditions for initiating a criminal procedure against Golob have been met. However, Golob’s lawyer, Stojan Zdolšek, confirmed that Golob does not invoke immunity at this time. The issue now lies with the National Assembly, which will determine whether to allow the prosecution to proceed. The case involves allegations that Golob, while serving as Prime Minister, gave gifts to facilitate unlawful actions, potentially interfering with police work. The court requested permission from the National Assembly to continue the process since Golob was elected as a member of parliament after the request was filed, granting him procedural immunity until his mandate ends.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the legal proceedings involving a high-profile politician and outlines the procedural steps required by the National Assembly. It includes statements from both the prosecution and Golob’s defense without overtly favoring either side. There is no evident slm
The article discusses legal proceedings against Robert Golob, former leader of the Freedom Party, regarding alleged illegal interference in police operations. Specialized State Prosecutor (SDT) has informed President of the National Council Zoran Stevanović that conditions for initiating criminal proceedings against Golob are met. The SDT claims Golob allegedly committed the crime of unauthorized gift-giving for unlawful mediation. Meanwhile, attorney Luka Švab, representing former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar, states that they were only informed about the prosecutor’s notice through the media and lack direct information to comment on the content. Bobnar’s legal team views the prosecutor’s confirmation as validation of their assessment that her judgment in this case was correct. The case involves allegations that Bobnar reported Golob for interfering with police work. The SDT requested a judicial investigation into Golob, which was referred to the Ljubljana District Court, which has yet to decide. The court has asked the SDT to provide a mandate from the National Council for continuing the proceedings since Golob was elected as a member of parliament and enjoys process immunity
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the legal dispute without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the actions of the prosecution and the defense, including the legal arguments and positions taken by both parties. While the issue is politically sensitive due to involvement of high-profile政治人物,
The article discusses the legal situation surrounding Slovenian parliamentarian Robert Golob, who has declined to invoke his parliamentary immunity. The Specialized State Prosecution (SDT) has informed the National Assembly (DZ) about a potential criminal investigation against Golob, despite his lawyer confirming he is not invoking immunity. According to the constitution, the DZ has the authority to grant immunity even if the parliamentarian does not request it, which could mean the assembly could decide independently whether immunity is necessary to protect Golob’s mandate and履职. This contrasts with the case of European Parliament member Matej Tonin, where the SDT required him to invoke immunity first before proceeding with any action. The SDT has now filed a request with the Ljubljana City Court for an investigation into alleged illegal gift-giving related to unlawful mediation under Article 264(2) of the Criminal Code.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal framework and procedural aspects regarding parliamentary immunity without overtly favoring either side. It explains both the position of the SDT and the constitutional provisions allowing the DZ to act independently. While there is some emphasis on the implications of戈
The Slovenian State Prosecution Office has informed the President of the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, that the conditions for initiating a criminal procedure against former Prime Minister Robert Golob have been met. The alleged offense involves giving gifts for unlawful mediation, specifically related to pressure exerted on former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar to clean up the police force of 'Janšists,' a term referring to supporters of former Prime Minister Janez Janša. Bobnar resigned shortly after taking office due to these pressures. Golob is reportedly not invoking his parliamentary immunity, and the National Assembly will consider whether to recognize this immunity during a closed session. The prosecution had already requested a judicial investigation against Golob last October. If the National Assembly does not grant him immunity, the court will initiate a formal investigation, potentially leading to a criminal trial. Golob’s lawyer dismissed the allegations as unfounded, but Golob himself made a casual admission on camera, stating he agreed with Bobnar before she was appointed to clear the police of 'Janšists.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the charges against Golob and his defense, including quotes from his lawyer and his own casual admission. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing, providing information from multiple perspectives.
Odvetnik prvaka Svobode Roberta Goloba Stojan Zdolšek je potrdil, da se obvestilo specializiranega državnega tožilstva o možnosti kazenskega pregona zoper Goloba nanaša na zadevo Bobnar. Tožilstvo je obvesčilo predsednika DZ Zorana Stevanovića, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za začetek kazenskega postopka zaradi domnevnega nedovoljenega dajanja daril za nezakonito posredovanje. Zdolšek je dejal, da Golob ne sklicuje na imuniteto, kljub temu pa postopek v Državni zbor (DZ) predpisuje poslovnik DZ. Sodišče mora odločiti o uvedbi sodne preiskave, kar lahko povzroči začetek kazenskega postopka. Očitke o vmešavanju v delo policije je nanizala nekdanja notranja ministrica Tatjana Bobnar, medtem ko Golob te očitke zavrača.
Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja objektivno poročilo o sodnih postopkih proti politiku, brez izražanja stranskega stališča ali podpore k eni strani. Vse podatke ponuja na osnovi javno dostopnih informacij in ne pripiše nobene stranske podpore. Odvetnik Zdolšek opozori na zadevo Bobnar, vendar ne izraža svojega m
The article discusses the legal proceedings against Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Party in Slovenia. Specialized state prosecutor informed President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović that the conditions for initiating a criminal case against Golob were met, alleging he committed the crime of unauthorized provision of benefits for illegal intermediation under Article 264 of the Criminal Code. The case relates to allegations of interference with police operations, which were initially raised by former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar. Golob’s lawyer, Stojan Zdolšek, confirmed that Golob does not invoke his immunity, despite being a member of parliament. The National Council must now decide whether to grant Golob parliamentary immunity, which would affect whether the criminal case proceeds. The process involves multiple steps, including potential appeals, and the court has not yet ruled on the request for investigation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments regarding a potential criminal case against a political figure without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on legal procedures, official communications, and responses from both the prosecution and Golob’s legal team. While the issue
The Specialized State Prosecution (SDT) has informed the President of the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, that all conditions are met to initiate a criminal proceeding against Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Party and a member of parliament, for alleged illegal gift-giving related to improper mediation. The case is linked to former Interior Minister Tatjana Bobnar. SDT submitted a request for judicial investigation against Golob last October at the Ljubljana District Court under Article 264 of the Criminal Code. Golob’s lawyer, Stojan Zdolšek, confirmed that the notice relates to the Bobnar case but stated that specific charges are still unknown. Golob has not yet invoked parliamentary immunity, and the National Assembly will decide whether to grant him immunity or allow the criminal proceedings to proceed.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the legal process initiated by the SDT against Robert Golob, including quotes from both the SDT representative and Golob's lawyer. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content remains neutral in ph
Na podlagi poročila specializiranega državnega tožilstva je predsednik Državnega zbora Zoran Stevanović objavil, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za začetek kazenskega postopka proti poslancu Skupine Svoboda Robertu Golobu. Tožilstvo trdi, da je Golob kot predsednik vlade storil nedovoljeno dajanje daril za nezakonito posredovanje, kar zagrožuje kaznivo dejanje. Stevanović je dejal, da je Golobu obveščen, poslanska skupina Svoboda in mandatno-volilna komisija morata odločiti o priznanju poslanske imunitete, kar vpliva na začetek kazenskega postopka. Komisija bo obravnavala zadevo na zaprti seji, medtem ko je kazen za ugotovljeno dejanje lahko do šestih let zapora.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel opisuje začetek kazenskega postopka proti političnemu predstavniku (poslanec), kar je politično naloženo. Poudarek je na ugotavljanju kaznivih dejanj v okviru politične funkcije, kar kaže na levi orientaciji. Vsebinsko se osredotoča na uporabo zakona proti političnim subjektom, kar lahko pri
The article reports that Robert Golob, a prominent Slovenian politician, is facing a criminal proceeding and has stated he will not invoke his parliamentary immunity. This decision comes amid ongoing legal challenges against him, which could impact his political standing and the dynamics within Slovenia's government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement regarding Golob's decision not to claim immunity during a criminal process. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The focus is on the legal action itself rather than taking a stance on Golob's innocence or guilt.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
