Mumbai Police file FIRs against over 50 persons for CJP solidarity protest

Scroll.inIndependentCenter10 hr. ago

Mumbai Police have filed three FIRs against over 50 individuals involved in a solidarity protest at Chaityabhoomi in Dadar, following a similar demonstration in Delhi where the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) attempted to march to Parliament. The protest in Delhi was aimed at demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over allegations of mismanaging competitive exams. Delhi police used tear gas and lathi charges to stop the march, leading to widespread arrests and detentions. In response, supporters across India, including in Mumbai, organized solidarity demonstrations. Mumbai authorities cited prohibitions on unauthorized public gatherings and deployed heavy security at key locations like Azad Maidan and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus. Some protesters claimed they were peacefully demonstrating when detained, while others reported witnessing police violence. Civil society members and artists involved in the protests described being briefly detained but not physically assaulted.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, citing both the police actions and protester claims without overtly favoring either side. It includes multiple sources and perspectives, such as reports from ANI, IANS, PTI, and direct quotes from protesters and civil society members. There's

Scroll.inIndependentCenter12 hr. ago

On July 21, 2026, the Cockroach Janta Party organized a protest in Delhi demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over allegations of mismanaging competitive exams. Protesters attempted to march toward Parliament but were stopped by police, who used lathi charges and tear gas. Major newspapers like The Indian Express and Hindustan Times covered the event, focusing on the police crackdown and the disruption caused by the demonstration. While The Indian Express included statements from injured protesters, most outlets did not prominently feature the voices of those harmed. A spokesperson for the campaign criticized meetings with BJP leaders as ineffective, stating that future negotiations would occur only if officials attended the protest site.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the protest, police actions, and responses from both protesters and officials. It highlights discrepancies in media coverage but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, presenting multiple perspectives without overtly favoring

Scroll.inIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Thousands of young people in central Delhi protested against Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, leading to clashes with police who used batons and tear gas. Scroll.in reporters documented the event and discussed its implications for the Modi government. The protest reflects growing youth discontent with government policies, particularly regarding education. The incident highlights tensions between protesters and law enforcement, raising questions about governance and public sentiment.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a legitimate expression of youth anger against government policies, emphasizing the scale and impact of the demonstration. It portrays the Modi government as facing challenges from public dissent, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective that often critiques the

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenteryesterday

The Indian government ordered a temporary suspension of mobile internet services in parts of central Delhi, including areas around Jantar Mantar, until 6 pm on Monday. This came amid protests organized by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. Telecom service providers like Airtel, Reliance Jio, and Vodafone Idea were reportedly instructed to comply with the shutdown. Protesters faced disruptions starting at 10 am, with police using force to prevent the march toward Parliament. The Internet Freedom Foundation criticized the lack of transparency, noting that no official order was publicly released, violating Supreme Court guidelines. According to the Software Freedom Law Centre, India has experienced numerous internet shutdowns over recent years, with 24 recorded in 2026 alone.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the event factually, citing multiple sources including officials, telecom companies, and civil society groups. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, nor does it favor one side over another. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the sequence of events, the actions taken