ARThe article discusses how authoritarian regimes maintain power through the recruitment and manipulation of mid-level workers rather than relying solely on ideological commitment or extreme measures. It references historical examples such as Russia under Putin, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, and Hungary under Viktor Orbán, highlighting how these leaders leverage bureaucratic and military personnel who seek personal advancement. The piece cites new research based on data from Argentina’s 'dirty war' era, suggesting that career aspirations and professional incentives can drive individuals to violate ethical norms and support authoritarian agendas. The study draws parallels between Hannah Arendt’s concept of the 'banality of evil' and corporate management strategies, arguing that ordinary people, not just extremists, often enable authoritarian systems by seeking personal gain.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents a critical view of authoritarianism and its mechanisms, it does not overtly favor one political ideology over another. The framing remains balanced, focusing on empirical findings and historical case studies without taking a partisan stance. The emphasis is on analyzing a廣
