NGThe article discusses the ongoing post-UTME screening process in Nigerian higher education institutions, which began as a government initiative in 2005/2006 to combat exam malpractice. These screenings aim to verify students' qualifications against their JAMB scores through various methods like computer-based tests and interviews. While acknowledging the benefits of the process, including improved academic prediction and reduced early dropout rates, the author criticizes universities for failing to reassess the relevance and effectiveness of these screenings over two decades. Concerns include rising costs, socio-economic impacts, and safety issues for students traveling between cities for exams. The piece highlights the outdated nature of the system and calls for modernization.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the post-UTME screening process as an outdated and problematic system that requires urgent reform. It critiques the lack of institutional innovation and highlights systemic failures, using emotive language and emphasizing social inequality and safety concerns. The tone suggests a左
