ON
← Back to feed
MTBPS 2026: Opposition calls Godongwana’s fuel levy cuts ‘a scam’ as GNU offers muted support
ZA🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 hr. ago

MTBPS 2026: Opposition calls Godongwana’s fuel levy cuts ‘a scam’ as GNU offers muted support

South African Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana presented the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) shortly before the November 2024 municipal elections, announcing a temporary reduction in the fuel levy to lower petrol and diesel prices until January 2027. The budget allocates significant funds to various sectors, including R3.8 billion for hiring 3,500 social workers to combat gender-based violence, R823 million for joint defense and police operations against gangsterism, and R304 million for the Department of Home Affairs to manage mass repatriations linked to recent immigration deadlines. Special appropriations totaling R6.9 billion include R4.4 billion for the South African Revenue Service and R918 million for parliamentary reconstruction following the 2022 fire. Opposition parties reacted sharply to the fuel levy cuts, with MK Party and EFF representatives labeling the measure a cynical 'scam' and 'election ploy' designed to sway voters rather than stimulate the broader economy. While Cositu expressed disappointment over the lack of decisive action on high unemployment, ActionSA criticized the magnitude of the fuel relief while welcoming increased funding for tax audits

Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana delivered the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement on Wednesday, announcing immediate reductions to fuel levies intended to alleviate pressure on consumers ahead of the municipal elections scheduled for November 4. The announcement came just two weeks before voters head to the polls, a timing that drew sharp criticism from opposition parties who labeled the moves cynical electioneering. Godongwana stated that the general fuel levy would be reduced by three rand per liter for diesel and one rand fifty cents per liter for petrol starting November 4. This initial phase runs until December 1. Following this period, the relief will taper to one rand fifty cents per liter for diesel and one rand per liter for petrol, remaining in effect until January 5, 2027. The fiscal cost of these measures is estimated at ten billion rand in foregone revenue. To maintain fiscal neutrality, the government plans to return ten billion rand previously transferred to the Central Energy Fund back to the National Revenue Fund. National Treasury Director-General Duncan Pieterse explained that the decision relies on rebuilt fiscal buffers, allowing the relief to proceed without compromising spending or debt targets. He noted that while the relief is positive for household consumption and inflation control, it must remain within the broader fiscal framework. Treasury estimates suggest that the combination of levy relief and consumer behavioral changes, specifically reduced fuel purchases, could result in a deviation of up to thirty-one billion rand in fuel levy collections for the 2026/27 financial year. Originally, the department had budgeted for one hundred four point nine billion rand in collections for that period, a figure now revised downward to seventy-four billion rand. Record-high pump prices prompted the intervention. In October, ninety-five unleaded petrol reached a peak of thirty rand twenty-five cents per liter in Gauteng and twenty-nine rand thirty-eight cents on the coast. Wholesale diesel costs stood at thirty-one rand ninety-six cents in Gauteng. Data indicates that without the levy cut, prices would have risen further in November, with projections showing increases of one rand fifty-two cents for ninety-five unleaded and one rand fifty-nine cents for ninety-three unleaded. Global factors contributed to the spike, including supply disruptions linked to conflicts involving Iran and restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz. South Africa imports the majority of its fuel, making it vulnerable to international price swings. Beyond fuel, the budget statement outlined specific allocations for national priorities. Three hundred sixty-five million eight hundred thousand rand was designated for the Madlanga Commission. An additional eight hundred twenty-three million one hundred thousand rand was allocated to Operation Prosper, a joint initiative between the defense force and police aimed at combating gangsterism and illegal mining. The government committed three point eight billion rand to hire three thousand five hundred social workers to intensify efforts against gender-based violence and femicide. Furthermore, three hundred four million rand was assigned to the Department of Home Affairs to manage unforeseen expenses related to the mass repatriation and deportation of foreign nationals, a process accelerated by a June 30 deadline set by the March and March group. Special appropriations totaling six point nine billion rand include four point four billion rand for the South African Revenue Service, nine hundred eighteen million rand for parliamentary reconstruction and public participation following the January 2022 fire, and two hundred eighty million rand for healthcare services for retired defense members. Reaction from political stakeholders was divided. Cosatu expressed deep disappointment, characterizing the package as a missed opportunity to address the forty-three point eight percent unemployment rate and stagnant growth. Thulani Shongwe, an MK Party member of parliament, described the fuel levy cuts as a scam and cynical electioneering, arguing that the budget failed to prioritize job creation or land reform. Sinawo Thambo, spokesperson for the Economic Freedom Fighters, dismissed the measures as an election ploy, stating there was no evidence of genuine economic stimulus. Alan Beesley of ActionSA voiced disappointment that the levy cuts were not more substantial but welcomed the increased funding for the tax authority. Mmusi Maimane, leader of Build One South Africa, acknowledged the appeal of the cuts during an election year but argued they would not sufficiently accelerate economic growth. Within the Government of National Unity, responses varied in tone. Fikile Mbalula, secretary-general of the African National Congress, praised the moves for returning money to working families and signaling control over government debt. However, other coalition partners offered more reserved assessments. Wouter Wessels of the Freedom Front Plus called the statement positive given the country's condition but deemed the fuel relief too little and too late. Nqabayomzi Kwankwa, chief whip of the United Democratic Movement, stated that improved balance sheets did not automatically translate into better lives for citizens. Songezo Zibi of Rise Mzansi described himself as happy but not thrilled, expressing regret that savings from curbing social grant corruption were not directed toward fighting hunger. The Democratic Alliance pushed for bolder structural reforms, with Kingsley Wakelin asserting that while the treasury laid a foundation, the rest of government must now deliver the necessary growth drivers. Macroeconomic forecasts presented in the statement indicate a weakening growth outlook. The economy is now projected to expand by one point two percent in 2026, down from the one point six percent predicted in February. Growth is expected to recover to one point six percent in 2027 and reach two percent by 2029. Public debt is forecast to stabilize at seventy-eight point four percent of gross domestic product in the 2025/26 financial year, marking the first time the ratio has paused in nearly two decades. Revenue improvements have been driven by stronger corporate, dividend, and value-added tax collections, though analysts note much of this stems from elevated commodity prices that are unlikely to persist in the medium term.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

News24 logoNews24IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 9519 hr. ago
New fuel levy relief to take pressure off consumers until end of 2026

South Africa’s Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced a temporary reduction in fuel levies to alleviate rising pump prices that reached record highs in October. The relief provides a discount of up to R3 per liter for diesel and R1.50 per liter for petrol from November 4 to December 1, followed by a reduced discount of R1.50 for diesel and R1 for petrol until January 5, 2027. This measure is estimated to cost the state R10 billion in foregone revenue, which will be funded by returning funds from the Central Energy Fund to the National Revenue Fund. National Treasury Director-General Duncan Pieterse stated that while the relief supports households and the broader economy, it must remain fiscally neutral to avoid compromising government spending and debt targets. Previous fuel levy reliefs implemented earlier in the year resulted in approximately R23 billion in lost revenue.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific government economic policy decision using direct quotes from the Finance Minister and Treasury officials. It presents the fiscal costs, the funding mechanism, and the official justification for the move without employing loaded language or taking a partisan stance.

Why factuality (90): This article provides very specific details on the fuel levy reduction amounts (R3/litre diesel, R1.50/litre petrol initially, then reduced) and dates (Nov-Dec, then until Jan 5, 2027). These specifics match typical Treasury announcements. It cites current pump prices and projected increases, adding

Why objectivity (95): The writing style is dry, factual, and journalistic. It presents the announcement, the numbers, and the market context without injecting opinion or emotional language. It remains strictly informative regarding the financial impact and consumer effect.

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 809 hr. ago
MTBPS 2026: Opposition calls Godongwana’s fuel levy cuts ‘a scam’ as GNU offers muted support

South African Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana presented the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) shortly before the November 2024 municipal elections, announcing a temporary reduction in the fuel levy to lower petrol and diesel prices until January 2027. The budget allocates significant funds to various sectors, including R3.8 billion for hiring 3,500 social workers to combat gender-based violence, R823 million for joint defense and police operations against gangsterism, and R304 million for the Department of Home Affairs to manage mass repatriations linked to recent immigration deadlines. Special appropriations totaling R6.9 billion include R4.4 billion for the South African Revenue Service and R918 million for parliamentary reconstruction following the 2022 fire. Opposition parties reacted sharply to the fuel levy cuts, with MK Party and EFF representatives labeling the measure a cynical 'scam' and 'election ploy' designed to sway voters rather than stimulate the broader economy. While Cositu expressed disappointment over the lack of decisive action on high unemployment, ActionSA criticized the magnitude of the fuel relief while welcoming increased funding for tax audits

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the budget announcement by detailing specific fiscal allocations and quoting reactions from multiple political stakeholders across the spectrum. It includes critical commentary from opposition figures such as the EFF, MK Party, and Cositu, who characterize

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the specific budget allocations mentioned in the prompt (Madlanga Commission, Operation Prosper, social workers, Home Affairs, SARS, etc.) and aligns with the general context of the MTBPS. It includes specific figures like R365.87m and R823.1m which appear precise. Ho

Why objectivity (80): The tone is relatively neutral, presenting the government's actions and the opposition's criticism ('scam', 'election ploy') fairly. It uses quotes to convey the dissenting views rather than adopting them. The phrase 'It was always going to be tricky' adds a slight narrative flavor but does not sign

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories