A year and a half after the discovery of an illegal waste dump in Gospić, the USKOK investigation confirmed serious soil contamination and the presence of so-called forever chemicals (PFAS) in groundwater. The findings warn of potential further spread of pollution, and Environment Minister Marija Vučković commented on the cleanup plans and future steps. Residents living near the site have long feared these results, which show extremely high concentrations of harmful substances such as copper, zinc, lead, and antimony. The report concludes that this is a locally significant and progressive contamination that has already caused lasting changes to the environment. Without cleanup, the landfill will remain a permanent source of pollution with possible consequences for the environment and human health. Vučković stated that the findings do not significantly change the cleanup plan, emphasizing that the ministry has always treated the issue as an environmental crime. She explained that two procurement processes are currently open, one for hazardous waste and another for non-hazardous waste, and highlighted the challenge posed by buried waste. She noted that there is no urgent procedure for🧹
The European Parliament has been alerted to the environmental crisis in Gospić, Croatia, thanks largely to the efforts of local residents who have brought attention to the illegal dumping of hazardous waste. Gordan Bosanac, a member of the European Parliament representing the party "Možemo!" and part of the Greens group, stated during an interview with Nova TV's Hanan Nanić that the situation involving perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has reached Brussels. He emphasized that this issue is a major concern within the European Union, particularly among the Greens, who are pushing for stricter regulations against PFAS compounds due to their potential harm to human health. In June, before the broader public became aware of the situation in Gospić, Bosanac had sent seven residents living near the landfill in the area for testing in Brussels. The tests aimed to determine the extent of contamination in individuals rather than just focusing on water or soil levels. Results from these tests are expected towards the end of this month or early next year. According to Bosanac, the case of Gospić has already reached the European Union, primarily due to the actions of the citizens of Gospić. An initiative called "Gospić is our home" submitted a proposal to the European Parliament committee, which Bosanac is a part of. This proposal has entered a fast-track process and will be discussed in October. Bosanac expressed hope that other Croatian members of the European Parliament would not block the issue, given its importance. Bosanac mentioned that he has recently spoken with Slovenian and Italian colleagues who are interested in understanding what happened on their side of the border. He described the situation as an extraordinary ecological crime that primarily affects the Croatian government under Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who has shown a lack of control over the country and waste management. He noted that both Slovenian and Italian colleagues are investigating what occurred on their respective territories. Speaking about who is responsible for this situation, Bosanac indicated that it is a systemic problem, not limited to Gospić alone. He announced that members of his party, "Možemo!" and the Social Democratic Party (SDP), would hold press conferences in eight locations across Croatia today. These conferences aim to highlight the issue of illegal waste, lack of knowledge, and poor waste management practices, which he attributes to the failure of the current government to establish effective institutions to handle such problems. He also highlighted serious corruption allegations linked to this case, including the name of former chief state inspector Andrija Mikulić. Bosanac stressed that this mix of issues indicates significant problems in Croatia’s waste management policies. The European Commission will need to address what happened in Gospić and ask relevant institutions in Croatia questions regarding the incident. He pointed out that in waste management policies, it is evident how industry and private capital benefit at the expense of human safety and general well-being. Croatia's legislation aligns with that of the European Union, but there are areas for improvement, such as introducing ecocide into criminal law. Bosanac urged better legislative work, not only on main laws but also on subordinate acts. The political parties Most and the HDZ have taken different approaches to addressing the issue. Most has requested an extraordinary session of the Croatian Parliament to discuss the responsibility for the ecological disaster in Lika and the illegal disposal of dangerous waste. They argue that there is no time left for delays, political maneuvering, or hearings without concrete consequences. They want to establish political responsibility at the highest level and decide on it in the Croatian Parliament. On the other hand, the HDZ has suggested a new approach to the cleanup of waste in Gospić, proposing a negotiation-based agreement instead of previous unsuccessful tenders. They believe this could lead to faster and more effective solutions. However, they emphasize that the protection of health and the environment should be the priority. Various groups, including the Bloc of Retired People (BUZ), have called for the resignation of the government and early elections, arguing that the situation in Gospić represents a turning point for the government. They claim that the government has failed to act on the issue and that the time for accountability has come. The European Parliament is expected to play a crucial role in addressing the situation, with Bosanac planning to submit the citizen petition from Gospić to the European Parliament for urgent consideration. He emphasized that Croatia must not become a dumping ground for hazardous waste within the European Union.
Go to the primary sources (7)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
An article reports on environmental contamination at a waste dump site in Gospić, Croatia, following a two-year investigation by USKOK into illegal waste disposal. The findings reveal significant soil pollution with toxic substances such as copper, zinc, lead, and antimony, raising concerns about potential long-term health and ecological impacts. Residents living near the site express fear and frustration, emphasizing the need for immediate remediation. One resident, Željka Šikić, highlights the lack of action despite warnings and protests, and expresses deep concern for her children’s future. She criticizes the disregard for clear signs of contamination and questions why authorities continue to ignore the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of governance and accountability, highlighting residents' anger over ignored warnings and the prioritization of economic interests over public health. It emphasizes the human cost and moral responsibility, using emotive language and direct quotes from a diss
Why factuality (98): The article is highly faithful to the primary source document, accurately reflecting the findings of the USKOK investigation, the elevated levels of toxic substances, and the concerns raised by Željka Šikić. All key points from the original text are included with minimal deviation.
Why objectivity (90): The article is very balanced in its presentation, quoting directly from the interviewee and providing context without editorializing. The tone remains neutral throughout, even when discussing emotionally charged statements made by the interviewee.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 8817 days ago
An article reports on environmental contamination at a waste dump site in Gospić, Croatia, following a two-year investigation by the USKOK agency. The findings reveal significant soil pollution with toxic substances such as copper, zinc, lead, and antimony, indicating potential long-term health and ecological risks. Residents living near the site express fear over the health implications, particularly for children, and demand urgent remediation. Local resident Željka Šikić highlights the lack of action despite repeated warnings and protests, emphasizing that the issue stems from human actions rather than natural disasters. She mentions personal analyses showing high levels of toxins and references a man who fell ill due to exposure. Experts have identified the site as an 'eco-bomb' with dangerous underground properties.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic failure of local authorities and emphasizes the human impact and social justice angle. It highlights residents’ fears and calls for accountability, using emotive language and direct quotes from affected individuals. While it presents scientific data, the sl
Why factuality (97): This article closely follows the primary source document, accurately reporting the findings of the 365-page USKOK investigation and the elevated concentrations of harmful substances. It includes direct quotes from Željka Šikić and provides context about the illegal waste disposal. The details match
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while presenting the concerns of the resident and the official findings. Some emotional language is present due to the interviewee’s statements, but the overall framing remains objective and balanced.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 9012 days ago
Policijalni analitičar Žarko Puhovski za N1 komentariše slučaj nezakonito odloženog opasnog otpada u Gospiću, koji je postao jedna od najvećih političkih i ekoloških kriza za vlade Andreja Plenkovića. Puhovski ističe dugoročne posljedice za stanovništvo i teritoriju, posebno zbog neobrashćenih PFAS spojeva koji se šire vodom i mogu dostići područje prema moru. Kritizira predsjednika Zorana Milanovića za neiskorištenje ustavne mogućnosti za sazivanje izvanredne sjednice Sabora, te zahtijeva hitnu akciju od strane parlamenta i nadzor nad institucijama. Također napominje da se ne ide s mora, što sugerira problem u suradnji između vlade i drugih organa.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of leadership by the ruling party and criticizes the executive branch for inadequate response. It emphasizes the need for parliamentary oversight and calls out the president for not using his constitutional powers. The tone suggests a left-leaning critique,
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes Puhovski's statements from the primary source, including his assessment of the crisis, the irreversible nature of PFAS contamination, and his criticism of Milanović. It does not add any unsupported claims or omit key details.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Puhovski's views without editorializing or showing bias toward any political side.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 9012 days ago
Mirela Holy, bivša hrvatska ministrica zaštite okoliša, komentirala je aferu oko deponija otpada u Gospiću, navodeći da Hrvatska ima nedostatak funkcionalnog sustava gospodarenja otpadom. Ona ističe da je Hrvatska na posljednjem mjestu u EU po indeksu okolišne učinkovitosti, što pokazuje nedostatak političke volje za zaštitu okoliša. Holy naglašava da problema postoji već godinama, a da je rizik od kontaminacije vode, tla i prehrambenog lancanika dugoročan i ozbiljan.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism of the government's environmental policies and highlights failures in waste management, which are framed as evidence of a lack of political will and systemic neglect. The tone emphasizes the government's responsibility and the severity of the issue, suggesting a left-傾
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects Mirela Holy's statements from the primary source, including her critique of the waste management system and the EU rankings. It provides direct quotes and contextual information without embellishment.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral and objective, presenting Holy's expert analysis without taking sides or using biased language.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9013 days ago
The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition has released a detailed chronology of their actions regarding the illegal waste disposal incident in Gospić. The ministry emphasized that the state will ensure the cleanup process while holding those responsible for the illegal dumping accountable. They refuted claims that institutions did not respond promptly, outlining steps taken since the discovery of the waste in February 2025. According to environmental law, the local municipality is primarily responsible for cleaning up illegally dumped waste, but due to the inability of the local authority to cover costs and lack of action at the local level, the ministry and the Environmental Fund quickly initiated procedures to enable state funding for the cleanup. The government amended the Waste Management Plan in May 2025 to include the Gospić site in the cleanup plan. The preparation for the cleanup could not begin before November 2025 due to investigative activities by the relevant authorities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the ministry's actions and legal responsibilities without overtly favoring any side. It provides a chronological explanation of the situation and emphasizes adherence to legal procedures, avoiding biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (95): This article provides detailed information from the Ministry of Environment and Green Transition regarding their actions and responsibilities concerning the illegal waste disposal in Gospić. It includes a chronological account of events and legal obligations, aligning closely with the cross-source c
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual reporting of the ministry's response and legal framework. It avoids taking sides and presents information objectively, making it highly balanced in its approach.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9013 days ago
The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Green Transition has announced that it will address illegal waste dumping in Gospić, emphasizing that the state will ensure the cleanup while holding those responsible for the illegal disposal accountable. The ministry and the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund have been actively working within their legal responsibilities since the issue was first identified in early 2025. They refuted claims that they had not responded promptly, providing a detailed timeline of actions taken, including incorporating the site into the Waste Management Plan and preparing for the cleanup. The ministry stated that environmental and health impacts will continue to be monitored, and the cleanup will proceed in collaboration with local authorities, relevant institutions, and citizens. According to the Waste Management Act, the primary responsibility for cleaning up illegally dumped waste lies with the polluter or the local municipality where the waste was disposed.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, focusing on the actions taken by the Ministry and the Environmental Protection Fund, while clearly stating that responsibility for the illegal waste lies with the individuals or entities involved. There is no overtly biased language or one-si
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the Ministry of Environment and Green Transition's response to the illegal waste disposal in Gospić, including their actions and legal responsibilities. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides a detailed account of the situation.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual reporting of the ministry's response and legal framework. It avoids taking sides and presents information objectively, making it highly balanced in its approach.
Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 9013 days ago
The head of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, announced that the party will initiate the withdrawal of the current government due to the illegal delay of hazardous waste disposal in Gospić. He described Gospić as 'the moment when the glass has spilled over,' emphasizing that this issue transcends left-right politics and concerns whether the same rules apply to everyone in Croatia. Hajdaš Dončić criticized the government for frequent ministerial changes without accountability and called for transparency and responsibility. He urged all political actors to take ownership of the situation and emphasized that the government seeking confidence in the Croatian Parliament must be ready to accept responsibility for national issues. The SDP plans to challenge the government’s credibility in parliament and hold representatives accountable for their votes.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of governmental accountability and calls for stricter oversight, aligning with left-leaning values of transparency and collective responsibility. The emphasis on systemic governance and institutional responsibility reflects a progressive critique of the现状, a
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Minister Marija Vučković's statements regarding the ongoing processes related to the illegal waste disposal in Gospić. It includes details about public procurement processes and international inquiries into waste reception, aligning with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on factual reporting of the minister's responses and ongoing efforts. It avoids taking sides and presents information objectively, making it highly balanced in its approach.
The article reports that none of the opposition parties attended a meeting organized by the 'Most' parliamentary group in Croatia, which was focused on addressing illegal dumping of hazardous waste in the area of Gospić. The meeting aimed to discuss a joint initiative for an extraordinary session of the Parliament and the submission of a motion of no confidence against the government. The organizers expressed disappointment over the absence of representatives from opposition parties and emphasized the need to hold accountable companies involved in illegal waste disposal. They mentioned specific entities such as Cezar, Kemis-Termoclean, and others, while also referencing allegations against Josip Šincek for illegally transporting hazardous waste since 2019. Some lawmakers criticized the ruling party's lack of urgency regarding the environmental crisis, suggesting that citizens should take to the streets if the government fails to act.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of the ruling party (HDZ) to address environmental concerns, particularly highlighting their alleged negligence toward a national crisis. It emphasizes accountability of the government and calls for citizen action, aligning more with left-leaning critiques.
Why factuality (95): This article gives a comprehensive account of the parliamentary meeting initiated by Most, including the absence of opposition parties, the reasons for the meeting, and direct quotes from Most representatives like Grmoja and Troskot. All these details match the information provided in other articles
Why objectivity (85): The article reports the events objectively, quoting both Most representatives and noting the absence of opposition members. While it includes some commentary from Most representatives, it does so without overtly favoring them, keeping the overall tone balanced and neutral.
Predsjednik Mosta Nikola Grmoja naveo je da će klubovi zastupnika u Hrvatskom saboru predložiti izvanrednu sjednicu Sabora kako bi pritiskali vladu da odgovori na ekološku katastrofu uzrokovanu ilegalnim odlaganjem opasnog otpada u Gospiću. Grmoja tvrdi da jedina moguća posljedica takvog slučaja jest pad vlade, a zastupnik Zvonimir Troskot upozorio je da će se, ako se ne reagira, pojaviti azbestne ploče. Troskot navodi da su visokopozicionirani članovi HDZ-a, poput župa Petry i bivšeg glavnog državnog inspektora Andrija Mikulića, sudjelovali u incidentu. Zastupnik Marin Miletić napominje da bi vlada pala u svakoj demokratskoj zemlji, ali smatra da će premijer Andrej Plenković 'nekog drugog baciti pod autobus'. Miletić također ističe da ljudi traže zajedništvo i da žele Hrvatsku gdje političari dobivaju nagrade za dobro djelo, a ne kršenje zakona.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel fokusira na kritiku vlade i opoziciju, koristi izraz 'pad vlade' kao najteži mogući ishod, naglašava ulogu političara u ekološkoj katastrofi i upozorava na potrebu za promjenama. Povremeno se spominju konkretni političari iz HDZ-a, što sugerira kritiku domaćeg vladnog sustava. Riječi poput '
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Nikola Grmoja's statements about calling for an extraordinary session of the Croatian Parliament and linking the ecological disaster to potential government resignation. It aligns closely with the primary source document regarding the political stance and actions propo
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but leans slightly towards supporting the opposition's position by emphasizing the need for government accountability. However, it avoids overtly biased language.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days ago
The political group Blok umirovljenici zajedno (BUZ) has reacted strongly to environmental damage caused by illegal waste disposal in Gospić, calling it 'ecological terrorism' and demanding the resignation of the government. They argue that this incident represents a turning point, highlighting concerns over public health, water quality, soil, nature, and the future of the region. BUZ claims that multiple individuals linked to the ruling party were involved in or concealed the environmental disaster, and criticizes the government for failing to act despite having the necessary institutions in place. The group calls for the immediate resignation of the government and early parliamentary elections, urging citizens to withdraw their support and hold the government accountable for its alleged negligence and complicity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents strong criticism of the current government, accusing it of complicity in an ecological disaster and demanding its resignation. It frames the situation as a result of systemic corruption and institutional failure, while advocating for early elections and holding the ruling party,
Why factuality (95): The article accurately discusses the Ministry of Environmental Protection's timeline and legal obligations related to the cleanup. It aligns with the primary source in terms of legal references and procedural requirements.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on legal procedures and timelines rather than taking sides in the political debate surrounding the issue.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8514 days ago
Residents of Gospić have been exposed to heavy metals and microplastics for years due to illegal waste disposal, which poses serious health risks. Experts warn that prolonged exposure to these contaminants, such as copper, zinc, lead, and antimony, can have harmful effects on both human health and natural ecosystems. These substances were found at concentrations far exceeding legal limits at the waste site. The contamination began in 2022, and while the extent of its spread remains unclear, the long-term exposure over two years is considered chronic. Professor Marin Glad explains that such exposure through water or other pathways could result in significant health impacts, particularly for vulnerable groups like children, pregnant women, and those with chronic illnesses.
Bias read (Center): The article presents expert opinions and scientific findings regarding environmental contamination and its health implications. It does not take a clear ideological stance but focuses on factual information and warnings from professionals. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or煽
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the findings from the USKOK investigation, citing elevated levels of heavy metals like copper, zinc, lead, and antimony. It references expert opinion from Prof. Glad regarding health risks and aligns closely with the primary source document. The only minor deduction co
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, quoting experts and affected residents. However, phrases such as 'strah me da će nam djeca umirati u mukama' reflect strong emotional language from the interviewee, which could be seen as influencing the tone slightly.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8517 days ago
The environmental protection agency Uskok has released findings from an investigation into illegal waste disposal in Gospić, Croatia, involving a married couple named Šincek. The report confirms significant contamination of soil with hazardous substances such as copper, zinc, lead, and antimony, which have spread beyond the waste site. The study highlights mechanisms of pollution transfer, including infiltration into the ground, resuspension of particles, biological transmission through vegetation, and potential hydrological connections to groundwater. The findings indicate a progressive environmental impact that could affect human health if remediation measures are not taken. Chief State Prosecutor Ivan Turudić stated that the results are concerning and emphasized the need for transparency regarding the extent of contamination in the region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information from an environmental investigation without overtly favoring any political side. It includes statements from both Uskok and the chief state prosecutor, providing balanced perspectives on the issue of illegal waste disposal and its environmental impact.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the findings from the environmental assessment conducted by the Zagreb Faculty of Geotechnics, confirming hazardous waste contamination including elevated levels of copper, zinc, lead, and antimony. It references specific details from the primary source document such a
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but uses terms like 'threatening spread' and 'impact on health' which could be seen as slightly alarmist. However, these phrases are supported by the technical findings reported. The overall presentation remains factual and avoids overt bias.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8012 days ago
The Block of Retirees (Blok umirovljenika) has issued a strongly worded statement accusing the current government of complicity in an environmental disaster involving toxic waste dumping in Lika, which they describe as 'ecological terrorism.' They claim this incident surpasses previous corruption scandals linked to the ruling HDZ party and accuse the government of failing to act despite knowing about the situation. The group calls for the government to immediately resign and for early parliamentary elections to be held, arguing that the government has lost legitimacy due to its alleged inaction and involvement in the scandal. They demand accountability for those responsible and urge citizens to withdraw their trust in the current administration.
Bias read (Progressive): The article uses strong, emotionally charged language such as 'ecological terrorism,' 'corruption,' and 'criminality' to frame the government's actions. It explicitly calls for the resignation of the government and early elections, positioning itself against the ruling HDZ party. The tone is highly
Why factuality (95): The article accurately presents the call for an extraordinary session of the Parliamentary Committee and the demands for transparency and accountability. It aligns with the primary source document in terms of facts and proposed actions.
Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely neutral but shows a slight inclination toward criticizing the government's response while advocating for public hearings and accountability measures.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8015 days ago
MP Marin Miletić has requested an urgent investigation into suspected illegal waste disposal on state-owned land in the area of Udbina, Croatia. He claims that the waste could pose a threat to the environment, groundwater, and human health. Miletić provided the Ministry of Interior with the location and photographs obtained from citizens and demanded that authorities determine the type, quantity, and origin of the waste, including checking for hazardous substances like PFAS compounds. He emphasized that this is not an isolated local incident but part of a broader pattern of illegal waste management across Croatia, referencing similar cases in areas such as Gospić, Benkovc, and others. Miletić called for involvement from various state agencies, including environmental inspectors and legal authorities, to investigate the situation thoroughly.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a request by an MP for an investigation into alleged illegal waste disposal on state property. It includes direct quotes from the MP and outlines his concerns without overtly favoring any political side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the environmental and legal issues
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Marin Miletić’s request for an investigation into suspected illegal waste disposal near Udbina. It specifies the location, the nature of the potential waste, and the involvement of state-owned land. This aligns closely with the information presented in other articles a
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while emphasizing the seriousness of the situation. It focuses on the need for an investigation and does not take sides politically, though it highlights the potential risks to the environment and public health.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8016 days ago
The article discusses potential methods for cleaning up illegal waste sites in Gospic, Croatia, following environmental contamination confirmed by USKOK. In an interview with HRT, Mirko Budiša, deputy director of the Fund for Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency (FZOEU), outlined four possible solutions, ranging from temporary encapsulation to complete removal and incineration. The costs vary significantly, from two to three million euros for encapsulation to up to 125 million euros for incineration. A local civic initiative, 'Gospić is Our Home,' criticized the slow progress and warned that valuable time has been lost.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the cost estimates for different cleanup methods without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It includes perspectives from both the FZOEU representative and a local civic group, though the latter’s criticism is more emotional rather than a
Why factuality (95): This article closely follows the primary source document, accurately reporting the four proposed methods of cleanup along with their estimated costs. It directly quotes Mirko Budiša and includes the concerns raised by the civil initiative 'Gospić je naš dom'. All key details from the original report
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both the technical aspects of the cleanup options and the criticisms from the civil initiative. While it includes direct quotes and perspectives, it avoids overtly favoring any particular viewpoint, maintaining balance in its presentation.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7512 days ago
The Homeland Movement (DP), a coalition partner in the government, has announced a new approach to waste management in Gospić after current public tenders failed to yield results. The agreement with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković involves shifting to a negotiation-based model, which DP expects to provide faster and more effective solutions. Mladen Barać, the DP secretary, emphasized that the party will act solely in the interest of local residents and will monitor the situation closely. He highlighted the importance of protecting public health and the environment, stating that this case could serve as a precedent for legal reforms against ecocide and environmental crimes in Croatia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the DP's position and their proposed solution to the waste management issue in Gospić, but does not exhibit clear bias toward either side. It includes direct quotes from DP officials and mentions the government's involvement without overtly favoring one political group over the.
Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the content of the primary source document, quoting Mladen Barać’s statements about the shift to negotiation-based settlement after the current public call expires on August 25th. It accurately reflects his comments on the inefficiency of previous methods and the expecta
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the information neutrally, there is a slight leaning towards supporting the ruling coalition and the DP’s position, especially when mentioning the government’s actions. However, this is less pronounced than in the first article and remains relatively balanced.
In Gospić, a hazardous waste site has been confirmed by environmental experts, leading local citizens to demand urgent remediation and accountability. The State Environmental Inspectorate (USKOK) released findings showing significant contamination of soil and groundwater due to illegally dumped waste. The waste includes toxic materials like copper, zinc, lead, and antimony, with over 37,000 tons of electronic and medical waste mixed into the ground. Analysis indicates that pollution is spreading beyond the dumpsite through various mechanisms such as infiltration and resuspension of particles. Civil initiative 'Gospić is Our Home' calls for immediate action, citing concerns that the situation has led to permanent changes in the environment without proper cleanup measures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual findings from official sources (USKOK, Geotehnički fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu) without overt ideological slant. While the issue is politically sensitive due to potential regulatory and legal implications, the reporting remains balanced, focusing on scientific data,公民
Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, accurately reporting the USKOK findings, the involvement of the Faculty of Geotechnics, and the detailed analysis of contaminants. It provides specific data such as the amount of waste and types of harmful substances identified, matching the
Why objectivity (75): While the article reports the findings objectively, it does present the concerns of the civil initiative and quotes officials, which could be seen as slightly biased towards the community's perspective. However, it remains largely neutral in its presentation of facts.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 8815 days ago
Saborski zastupnik Mosta Marin Miletić zatražio je od ministra unutarnjih poslova Davora Božinovića da se pokrene istraga zbog sumnje da je na državnom zemljištu u Udbini nezakonito odložen otpad. Miletić je dostavio MUP-u lokaciju i fotografije koje je dobio od građana, tražeći da se utvrdi vrsta, količina i podrijetlo otpada, kao i prisutnost opasnih tvari poput PFAS spojeva. Zatražio je da se lokacija obiđe i dokumentira, a ako je potrebno, osigurati kako bi se spriječilo uklanjanje tragova. Sumnjiv otpad nalazi se na zemljištu koje je u vlasništvu Republike Hrvatske, a Miletić smatra da ovaj slučaj treba razmatrati u kontekstu ranijih slučajeva nezakonitog odlaganja otpada u Hrvatskoj.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a parliamentary representative requesting an investigation into potential illegal waste disposal on state-owned land. The framing is neutral, presenting the request without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from the representative but does not show clear bias in ph
Why factuality (92): The article accurately summarizes Marin Miletić's call for an investigation into suspected illegal waste disposal near Udbina, including the submission of evidence and the potential environmental risks. It aligns with the cross-source consensus but omits some specific details mentioned in other arti
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral stance but uses slightly more emotive language when describing the potential consequences of the alleged illegal dumping, which could subtly affect the reader's interpretation.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 8617 days ago
The article discusses findings related to hazardous waste contamination in the area of Lika, Croatia. The chief state prosecutor, Ivan Turudić, confirmed receiving a detailed report from the Faculty of Geotechnics containing over 350 pages, revealing significant pollution in the region. The report includes evidence of dangerous waste spreading beyond the landfill site, threatening further expansion through groundwater. Experts concluded that soil properties have changed, ecosystems have been disrupted, and the habitat has been irreversibly destroyed. Shortly after Turudić’s comments, the State Institute for Environmental Protection and Nature Conservation (USKOK) published the full report online, confirming these findings.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information based on reports from the Faculty of Geotechnics and USKOK, with no evident ideological framing or biased language. It focuses on environmental damage and expert conclusions without taking a political stance.
Why factuality (92): This article closely mirrors the content of the primary source document, particularly regarding the findings related to the hazardous waste in Lici and the involvement of national security. It accurately reports the release of the full report by USKOK and includes direct quotes from Turudić. There a
Why objectivity (86): The article maintains an objective tone, focusing on reporting the facts and official actions taken by USKOK. While there is some emphasis on the severity of the situation, it does not take a clear stance or introduce subjective interpretations.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8512 days ago
The article outlines the timeline of one of the most severe cases of ecological destruction in modern Croatian history, involving the illegal dumping of hazardous waste by the couple Josip and Monika Šincek near Gospić. The environmental impact was revealed through a report by the Faculty of Geotechnics, which found approximately 37,000 tons of mixed waste, including medical and electronic waste, plastics, and construction materials, contaminating the soil with heavy metals. Concentrations of copper were 100 times higher than allowed for agricultural land, and PFAS chemicals were detected in groundwater, posing a risk of further contamination if not addressed. The Šinceks had previously been recognized as innovators in waste management, developing a project called Eko-Mundus to create new materials from non-recyclable plastic. They obtained permits for using the former PPK Velebit silo site based on their waste recycling plans, but the permit only allowed processing non-hazardous waste, not disposal. The local mayor’s office issued the permit under the supervision of Jerko Kostelac, a member of the HDZ party who was later arrested by USKOK.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a case of environmental neglect linked to political oversight, highlighting the role of local authorities and the HDZ party. While it presents factual information about the environmental damage and legal violations, it emphasizes the connection between political misg府
Why factuality (90): The article covers the legal and environmental implications of the waste dumping, referencing the findings of the police operation and expert analysis. It aligns with the primary source document and provides additional context on the individuals involved.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is generally neutral, though there is a focus on the severity of the situation, which can be interpreted as slightly emotive. The article does not take a clear political stance.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
