ON
← Back to feed
Morocco's revived claim to Ceuta and Melilla is not a demand for decolonisation
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/31/2026

Morocco's revived claim to Ceuta and Melilla is not a demand for decolonisation

Morocco has renewed its claims over the Spanish-controlled enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, citing the recent influx of tens of thousands of African economic refugees attempting to cross into these territories. At least 141 people died during the dangerous crossings, and many who reached the enclaves were returned to their countries. The situation has led to increased border controls by Italy, under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, targeting non-EU nationals from Spain, prompting Spain to retaliate with similar measures. Morocco proposed talks with Spain regarding the sovereignty of Ceuta and Melilla, but Spain rejected the proposal. The article notes that Morocco’s actions come amid its strengthening alliances with the U.S. and Israel, which are critical of Spain’s leftist government. It provides historical context, explaining that Ceuta and Melilla were originally Portuguese and Spanish holdings respectively, ceded to Spain in the 17th century, and have remained under Spanish rule despite repeated Moroccan efforts to reclaim them throughout history.

Morocco’s renewed push for the return of the Spanish-controlled enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla has sparked intense diplomatic tensions, particularly with Spain and Italy. The situation escalated after a surge of tens of thousands of Moroccan and other African migrants attempted to cross into the Spanish territories, resulting in at least 141 deaths during the perilous journey. Most survivors were either forcibly or “voluntarily” repatriated, highlighting the precarious conditions faced by those seeking refuge. The movement has reignited longstanding territorial disputes, with Morocco asserting its historical claim to the two cities, known locally as Sabtah and Maliliah. Despite these efforts, Spain has maintained firm control over the areas, which have remained under its administration since the 16th century. The crisis gained further complexity when the Italian government, led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, introduced strict border checks targeting non-EU nationals arriving from Spain, citing concerns over potential illegal immigration from Arab and African countries. In response, Spain imposed reciprocal temporary border restrictions on flights and maritime crossings from Italy, escalating bilateral friction. Meanwhile, Morocco proposed discussions with Spain regarding the future status of Ceuta and Melilla, but Spain categorically rejected the offer, underscoring its unwillingness to engage in negotiations. This refusal has deepened the divide, with Morocco’s actions occurring against the backdrop of its growing strategic alignment with the United States and Israel, both of which hold a critical stance toward Spain’s leftist government. Historical context reveals that Morocco’s claim to Ceuta and Melilla is rooted in centuries of colonial history. The city of Sabtah, now Ceuta, was captured by Portugal in 1415 during the Reconquista and remained under Spanish rule following the dissolution of the Iberian Union in 1640. It was officially ceded to Spain under the 1668 Treaty of Lisbon. Similarly, Melilla, or Maliliah, was seized by Spain in 1497. Both territories have been part of Spanish holdings ever since, despite numerous Moroccan attempts to reclaim them throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. During the 18th century, the cities served as penal colonies before becoming free ports in 1906. Spain also sought to expand its influence by attempting to conquer the nearby town of Tetouan, leading to the Spanish-Moroccan War of 1859–60. The Spanish-American War of 1898, which saw Spain lose its remaining overseas colonies such as the Philippines and the Caribbean, prompted renewed interest in Moroccan territory. At the time, France was also expanding its colonial presence in Africa, prompting a shift in regional power dynamics. The 1900 Treaty of Paris delineated Spanish colonies in Rio de Oro, later known as Spanish Sahara, and Equatorial Africa, or Spanish Guinea. These regions, bordered by French territories, represented a diminished version of Spain’s former African empire. In 1904, under the Anglo-French Entente Cordiale, France and Spain agreed to demarcate their respective spheres of influence in North Africa, including Morocco, Egypt, and other regions. France recognized Spain’s claim to a narrow strip of northern Morocco, encompassing Ceuta and Melilla, extending westward along the Mediterranean but excluding the eastern border with Algeria. Tangier, another coastal enclave, was placed under international administration. This arrangement was formalized in the 1912 Treaty of Fez, which established French protectorate over Morocco. That same year, France allowed Spain to create its own protectorate in the region previously outlined in the 1904 agreement. Although Morocco has consistently challenged Spanish sovereignty over the two enclaves, the current dispute reflects broader geopolitical shifts, with Morocco leveraging its alliances to assert its claims in a manner distinct from traditional decolonization movements. As tensions continue, the future status of Ceuta and Melilla remains uncertain, with no immediate resolution in sight.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Sky News (World) logoSky News (World)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 788/31/2026
Italy and Spain extend tit-for-tat border controls after Ceuta migrant surge

Italy has extended its temporary border restrictions with Spain by another 15 days, continuing measures initially introduced in response to a significant influx of migrants into the Spanish territory of Ceuta. The decision follows a surge in migration activity that prompted both countries to implement stricter controls at their shared borders. The Italian government cited the need to manage the increased pressure on border security and immigration systems. This extension reflects ongoing tensions between the two nations over managing cross-border movement, particularly in light of recent humanitarian concerns related to migrant arrivals.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Italy’s decision to extend border controls with Spain without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the procedural and logistical aspects of the policy change rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue of migration is highly政治化

Why factuality (85): The article reports that Italy has extended its border restrictions with Spain by 15 days, aligning with the cross-source consensus that both countries have implemented measures in response to increased migration pressures. The claim about the 'mass rush' of migrants into Ceuta is consistent with mu

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the situation in a neutral tone but uses emotionally charged language such as 'mass rush' which may imply urgency or concern. While not overtly biased, the phrasing leans slightly towards emphasizing the severity of the situation.

Middle East Eye logoMiddle East EyeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 658/31/2026
Morocco's revived claim to Ceuta and Melilla is not a demand for decolonisation

Morocco has renewed its claims over the Spanish-controlled enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, citing the recent influx of tens of thousands of African economic refugees attempting to cross into these territories. At least 141 people died during the dangerous crossings, and many who reached the enclaves were returned to their countries. The situation has led to increased border controls by Italy, under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, targeting non-EU nationals from Spain, prompting Spain to retaliate with similar measures. Morocco proposed talks with Spain regarding the sovereignty of Ceuta and Melilla, but Spain rejected the proposal. The article notes that Morocco’s actions come amid its strengthening alliances with the U.S. and Israel, which are critical of Spain’s leftist government. It provides historical context, explaining that Ceuta and Melilla were originally Portuguese and Spanish holdings respectively, ceded to Spain in the 17th century, and have remained under Spanish rule despite repeated Moroccan efforts to reclaim them throughout history.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Morocco's claims over Ceuta and Melilla, including the humanitarian crisis and political responses from both Italy and Spain. While it acknowledges Morocco's historical grievances and current geopolitical motivations, it does not overtly favor one side over

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes Morocco's claim to Ceuta and Melilla, referencing historical events like the Portuguese conquest in 1415 and the Treaty of Lisbon. It also mentions recent refugee crossings and political responses, aligning with the primary source document. However, it presents these

Why objectivity (65): The article frames Ceuta and Melilla as 'Spanish settler colonies' and refers to the migrants as 'economic refugees,' which could be seen as biased language. It also suggests potential motivations behind Morocco's actions, which introduces a degree of editorializing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories