ON
← Back to feed
Cost of living overtakes housing as most important issue to people in Ireland
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 days ago

Cost of living overtakes housing as most important issue to people in Ireland

The article reports on a survey conducted by More in Common, which highlights that the cost of living has become the most pressing issue for people in Ireland, surpassing concerns related to housing. The survey, conducted between April and June 2026 with a sample size of approximately 4,300 respondents, indicates that issues such as cost of living (66%), housing (58%), and immigration are top priorities for the Irish public. In contrast, topics related to the EU presidency, including relations with the EU, defense, and the war in Ukraine, are considered less significant, with only 3%, 4%, and 5% of respondents citing them as major concerns. The survey also reveals that while the public supports closer ties with the EU, awareness of the EU presidency remains low, with 38% of respondents having not heard much about it. Additionally, the majority of respondents (61%) view EU membership positively.

Cost of living has emerged as the top concern for people in Ireland, surpassing even housing as the most pressing issue, according to a recent survey conducted by More in Common. This shift in public sentiment highlights a broader trend where domestic challenges take precedence over international matters, especially as Ireland assumes the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union. The survey, which collected responses from approximately 4,300 individuals between April and June, reveals that while the EU presidency garners little public attention, national concerns such as the rising cost of living and housing affordability dominate conversations.

The survey results indicate that 66% of respondents identified the cost of living as the most significant issue facing the country, followed by housing at 58%. Immigration and healthcare also feature prominently on the list of priorities. These findings suggest that the public expects the government to address these pressing domestic issues during the presidency. However, the survey also notes that there is limited awareness of the EU presidency itself, with 38% of participants reporting they had not heard much about it. Only a small fraction of respondents indicated they had heard “a lot” about the presidency, underscoring the disconnect between the political agenda and public interest.

When asked to choose between closer ties with the EU or the United States, a majority—three-quarters—opted for the EU, indicating a strong preference for maintaining close relationships with Europe. Despite this, public perception of the EU remains largely positive, with 61% of voters believing that EU membership benefits the country. This suggests that while the EU is seen as a partner, the immediate concerns of everyday citizens lie elsewhere.

Simultaneously, another survey conducted by the Central Statistics Office (CSO) sheds light on public trust in the government's handling of emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI). Over 60% of respondents expressed skepticism regarding the government's ability to ensure fair and unbiased treatment of citizens through AI, significantly exceeding the OECD average of 39%. Concerns extend to data privacy, with 72% of people doubting the government's capacity to safeguard personal information from unauthorized access or misuse. These findings highlight a growing unease about the ethical implications of AI integration in governance.

The CSO survey, which involved 2,197 participants, also revealed disparities in understanding of AI, with younger generations demonstrating greater familiarity with the technology. Notably, 81.7% of those aged 18 to 29 understood AI well, compared to just 37.8% of those 50 and older. Gender differences were also evident, with men more likely than women to feel confident explaining AI concepts. These insights underscore the importance of addressing knowledge gaps and ensuring transparency in AI implementation.

Public trust in various institutions has shown a decline, with only 43.8% expressing confidence in the national government, down from 46.6% in previous surveys. Trust in political parties remained relatively stable at 27.4%, while trust in international organizations dropped to 57.4%. Satisfaction with healthcare services was notably lower than that of the education system, with only 32.3% of respondents expressing satisfaction with healthcare, compared to 69.2% for education. These statistics reflect ongoing challenges in public services and the need for improved performance and accountability.

The survey also noted a decrease in overall trust in most people, with 78.7% of respondents stating they trusted most people in 2025, a slight drop from 82.5% in 2023. This trend indicates a subtle but noticeable erosion of societal trust, which could have implications for social cohesion and collective action.

These findings paint a complex picture of public sentiment in Ireland, where domestic concerns are paramount, yet there is a palpable sense of distrust toward governmental capabilities and decisions. As the country navigates its EU presidency and addresses technological advancements, the challenge lies in aligning policy with public expectations and restoring faith in institutional integrity. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether these concerns translate into meaningful change or further disillusionment.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

The Irish Times logoThe Irish TimesIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago
Maureen Dowd: I always thought most Americans sought to be fair. Lately, so much seems unfair

The article by Maureen Dowd reflects on her upbringing and the values instilled by her parents, emphasizing fairness and trust in government. Her mother taught her that fairness meant ensuring others weren't harmed, such as wrapping broken glass and supporting those in need. Her father demonstrated fairness through personal acts of kindness and standing up against injustice, like confronting the KKK. Both parents viewed fairness as a core American value, tied to their immigrant experiences and belief in the U.S. system. Dowd contrasts this with contemporary perceptions of unfairness, suggesting a shift in societal attitudes toward fairness and trust in institutions.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses fairness and trust in government, which are politically charged topics, the framing remains balanced. It presents the perspectives of Dowd's parents without overtly endorsing any specific political ideology. The narrative focuses on personal values rather than partisan sl

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately represents Maureen Dowd's personal anecdotes and reflections on fairness in America. It does not add any external commentary or interpretation beyond her original text. The tone is reflective and personal, maintaining a neutral stance despite the subjective nature of the conte

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 755 days ago
Cost of living overtakes housing as most important issue to people in Ireland

The article reports on a survey conducted by More in Common, which highlights that the cost of living has become the most pressing issue for people in Ireland, surpassing concerns related to housing. The survey, conducted between April and June 2026 with a sample size of approximately 4,300 respondents, indicates that issues such as cost of living (66%), housing (58%), and immigration are top priorities for the Irish public. In contrast, topics related to the EU presidency, including relations with the EU, defense, and the war in Ukraine, are considered less significant, with only 3%, 4%, and 5% of respondents citing them as major concerns. The survey also reveals that while the public supports closer ties with the EU, awareness of the EU presidency remains low, with 38% of respondents having not heard much about it. Additionally, the majority of respondents (61%) view EU membership positively.

Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a survey without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It objectively reports public sentiment regarding key issues and does not frame the data in a way that suggests a clear ideological leaning. While the cost of living and housing are highlighted as '

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): The article accurately summarizes the More in Common survey results regarding the most important issues in Ireland. It provides clear statistics and context about the EU presidency. The tone is slightly biased toward emphasizing domestic concerns over international ones, but it remains largely objec

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 707 days ago
More than 60% do not trust Govt to be unbiased in AI use

A recent survey conducted by Ireland's Central Statistics Office (CSO) reveals significant public distrust in the government's use of artificial intelligence (AI). Over 60% of respondents do not believe the government will ensure fair and unbiased treatment of citizens through AI, surpassing the OECD average of 39%. Additionally, 72% of people lack confidence in the government's ability to protect personal data from unauthorized access or misuse, compared to an OECD average of 44%. The survey highlights disparities in understanding AI, with younger individuals more familiar with the concept than older generations. While the survey includes broader trust metrics, such as declining trust in 'most people' and national government, the focus remains on public perception of AI governance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual survey results without overtly favoring any political ideology. It reports on public sentiment regarding AI governance and trust in government, presenting both the OECD comparison and internal demographic breakdowns objectively. There is no clear ideological slant in the

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 70): The article presents statistics from the OECD Trust Survey 2025 accurately, citing percentages and comparisons to the OECD average. However, it lacks specific details about the methodology or context of the survey beyond what is provided. The tone is somewhat biased toward highlighting distrust in g

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories