ON
← Back to feed
Montana’s plan to become an experimental medical hub just pushed forward
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Montana’s plan to become an experimental medical hub just pushed forward

Montana has advanced its 'right to try' legislation, allowing biotech companies to sell experimental drugs directly to consumers after minimal testing. Under the new rules, companies can pay $12,500 to apply for approval from a review board consisting of doctors, scientists, and ethicists. This law expands access beyond terminal illnesses to include individuals seeking treatments for rare diseases or longevity-enhancing therapies. Critics, including Harvard's Aaron Kesselheim, warn about the risks of selling unproven treatments without FDA oversight. The law was uniquely shaped by longevity advocates rather than traditional patient rights groups.

Montana's ambitious initiative to position itself as a pioneering center for experimental medical treatments has advanced significantly, with new regulations enabling biotechnology firms to seek approval for untested drugs. As of this week, companies developing such medications can submit applications to a newly created review panel for clearance. These applications come with a fee of $12,500, after which the approved treatments can be sold through specialized clinics. The first of these clinics is anticipated to open later this year. Under the new framework, any biotech firm that has conducted initial trials, often involving as few as ten healthy individuals, may pursue the sale of their drug. Unlike other regions with comparable laws that restrict access to terminally ill patients, Montana's approach allows any individual who provides informed consent and can afford the treatment to participate. This includes those seeking remedies for rare conditions and those interested in longevity-focused preventive therapies. Recent finalization of guidelines by the state’s Department of Health and Human Services outlines procedures ensuring patients give comprehensive informed consent. Each application undergoes scrutiny by a multidisciplinary panel comprising certified physicians, scientific experts, and ethicists. Advocates emphasize the importance of maintaining responsibility throughout the process, asserting that it involves qualified medical personnel and adequate supervision. Matt Kaeberlein, a scientist serving on the inaugural panel, emphasized the rigorous nature of the process, stating it would involve competent medical professionals and suitable oversight. However, concerns persist among some experts regarding the risks associated with offering unverified treatments without FDA oversight. Aaron Kesselheim, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School specializing in health policy and drug regulation, expressed reservations about the implications of such practices. The push for greater accessibility to unapproved drugs has gained momentum across the United States. However, Montana's legislative journey stands apart due to its origins rooted in longevity advocacy rather than traditional libertarian or patient advocacy circles. Initially enacted in 2015, Montana's right-to-try legislation underwent expansion in 2023 with backing from State Senator Ken Bogner. His objective was to shift focus towards preventative care rather than merely addressing diseases post-diagnosis. Bogner began drafting what would evolve into the 2023 legislation following outreach from the Alliance for Longevity Initiatives (A4LI), a non-profit organization committed to promoting policies enhancing human lifespan. Niklas Anzinger, a tech entrepreneur and longevity advocate, became increasingly engaged in the project over recent years. Based in Próspera, a private city and special economic zone in Roatán, Honduras, Anzinger operates Infinita City, alongside an investment firm and a service provider, all bearing the Infinita name. Initially focused on establishing a jurisdiction facilitating rapid research into life-extending drugs, Anzinger shifted attention to the U.S., believing Montana offers a superior model grounded in current regulatory frameworks. Following passage of Montana's 2023 law, Anzinger collaborated with several unnamed biotech enterprises to formulate a subsequent piece of legislation detailing how clinics could legally dispense unapproved drugs. This measure received legislative approval earlier this year.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

MIT Technology Review logoMIT Technology ReviewIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Montana’s plan to become an experimental medical hub just pushed forward

Montana has advanced its 'right to try' legislation, allowing biotech companies to sell experimental drugs directly to consumers after minimal testing. Under the new rules, companies can pay $12,500 to apply for approval from a review board consisting of doctors, scientists, and ethicists. This law expands access beyond terminal illnesses to include individuals seeking treatments for rare diseases or longevity-enhancing therapies. Critics, including Harvard's Aaron Kesselheim, warn about the risks of selling unproven treatments without FDA oversight. The law was uniquely shaped by longevity advocates rather than traditional patient rights groups.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both supportive and critical perspectives on Montana's new law. Proponents emphasize rigorous oversight and innovation, while critics highlight safety concerns and regulatory gaps. The framing remains balanced between different expert viewpoints without overt ideological leaning

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes Montana's new 'right to try' legislation, including the process for applying to the review board, the cost ($12,500), and the composition of the review board. It references specific individuals like Matt Kaeberlein and mentions the state's Department of Health and Hu

Why objectivity (70): The article presents both sides of the issue, mentioning supporters of the law and expressing concerns from other experts about potential harm. However, the tone leans slightly towards highlighting the innovative aspect of the law while acknowledging the risks. There is some editorializing in phrase

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories