Montana has advanced its 'right to try' legislation, allowing biotech companies to sell experimental drugs directly to consumers after minimal testing. Under the new rules, companies can pay $12,500 to apply for approval from a review board consisting of doctors, scientists, and ethicists. This law expands access beyond terminal illnesses to include individuals seeking treatments for rare diseases or longevity-enhancing therapies. Critics, including Harvard's Aaron Kesselheim, warn about the risks of selling unproven treatments without FDA oversight. The law was uniquely shaped by longevity advocates rather than traditional patient rights groups.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both supportive and critical perspectives on Montana's new law. Proponents emphasize rigorous oversight and innovation, while critics highlight safety concerns and regulatory gaps. The framing remains balanced between different expert viewpoints without overt ideological leaning
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes Montana's new 'right to try' legislation, including the process for applying to the review board, the cost ($12,500), and the composition of the review board. It references specific individuals like Matt Kaeberlein and mentions the state's Department of Health and Hu
Why objectivity (70): The article presents both sides of the issue, mentioning supporters of the law and expressing concerns from other experts about potential harm. However, the tone leans slightly towards highlighting the innovative aspect of the law while acknowledging the risks. There is some editorializing in phrase





