Monday.com is the latest tech company to blame AI for layoffs — here are 20 others
Monday.com, a Tel Aviv-based work management software company, cited AI as a reason for laying off approximately 20% of its workforce—over 600 employees—as part of a restructuring plan. The company emphasized that the cuts were not aimed at reducing costs or replacing workers with AI, but rather adapting to an AI-first strategy. This follows a broader trend in U.S. tech companies, where nearly 140,000 jobs have been cut since the start of 2026, with major firms like Amazon, Oracle, Meta, and Microsoft contributing significantly. A Financial Times analysis noted that companies attributing layoffs to AI have underperformed the Nasdaq by nearly 10% in the 30 days following their announcements. However, AI-focused firms like Anthropic and OpenAI are actively hiring, while some companies, such as Meta and IBM, are shifting employee roles toward AI-related areas rather than outright cutting staff.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Monday.com, an Israeli workplace software company, announced it is laying off approximately 630 employees—representing a 20% reduction in workforce—as part of a strategic shift to prioritize AI development. The company is reorganizing its operations to focus on its AI Work Platform, which includes tools like a no-code app builder, customizable AI agents, workflow automation, and a task-performing chatbot. This move aligns with broader trends in the tech industry, where many companies are reallocating resources to AI initiatives amid rising costs and shifting market demands. According to Layoffs.fyi, over 122,000 tech jobs have been cut in 2026, with 78% of companies citing AI-focused restructuring as a reason. Monday.com estimates it will face $45 million to $55 million in restructuring charges.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses corporate strategy and economic trends, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents the layoffs as a common industry trend driven by market forces and technological shifts, without overtly criticizing or praising either the decision or the broader AI focus. S
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about Monday.com's layoffs, including the percentage of staff affected (20%), the number of employees (around 630), and the financial impact ($45M-$55M in charges). It references external data from Layoffs.fyi regarding broader tech industry trends, which suppor
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the layoffs as part of a strategic shift toward AI, which is a common narrative in tech industry reporting. However, it frames the decision as a necessary move to 'support a leaner, more focused operating model,' which may subtly imply that the previous approach was less effecti
QuartzIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
Disney has announced plans to cut several hundred jobs across its organization, with significant layoffs expected at ESPN. The reductions are primarily linked to ESPN's recent acquisition of NFL Network, which was finalized in April. ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro stated that the majority of these job cuts are a result of integrating NFL Network into ESPN's operations. This move comes amid broader restructuring efforts within Disney's media division, aiming to streamline operations and reduce costs. The layoffs are expected to impact various departments within ESPN, though specific roles affected have not been detailed.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on corporate restructuring and job cuts related to a business acquisition. There is no indication of political bias in the framing, sourcing, or emphasis. The content focuses on operational changes within a private company without taking a stance on political issues.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that ESPN is cutting jobs related to the NFL Network integration, citing a statement from ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro. It aligns with the primary source document which mentions the acquisition of NFL Network and the subsequent layoffs. However, it does not mention speci
Why objectivity (80): The tone is neutral, focusing on the restructuring and impact on employees. However, it briefly mentions the significance of the layoffs without delving into potential biases or motivations, maintaining a generally balanced perspective.
Monday.com, a Tel Aviv-based work management software company, cited AI as a reason for laying off approximately 20% of its workforce—over 600 employees—as part of a restructuring plan. The company emphasized that the cuts were not aimed at reducing costs or replacing workers with AI, but rather adapting to an AI-first strategy. This follows a broader trend in U.S. tech companies, where nearly 140,000 jobs have been cut since the start of 2026, with major firms like Amazon, Oracle, Meta, and Microsoft contributing significantly. A Financial Times analysis noted that companies attributing layoffs to AI have underperformed the Nasdaq by nearly 10% in the 30 days following their announcements. However, AI-focused firms like Anthropic and OpenAI are actively hiring, while some companies, such as Meta and IBM, are shifting employee roles toward AI-related areas rather than outright cutting staff.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the AI-driven layoffs trend, including both negative impacts and positive developments. It cites multiple companies across different sectors and includes both criticism of AI-centric narratives and acknowledgment of AI's growing influence. The tone remains non
The Walt Disney Company, including its Pixar division, announced significant layoffs affecting hundreds of employees despite the recent success of 'Toy Story 5.' These cuts mark the third round of layoffs this year, impacting various departments such as Disney Entertainment Television, Disney Studios, ESPN, and corporate divisions. The layoffs at Pixar, primarily in production and operations, come after previous reductions in 2024 and 2023. While 'Toy Story 5' performed well financially, other recent Pixar films like 'Elio' and 'Hoppers' received weaker responses. Disney cited ongoing industry evolution and resource management as reasons for the cuts, aiming to build a more agile company.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about layoffs at Disney and Pixar without overtly favoring any particular political perspective. It includes quotes from Disney officials and references to external reports, providing a balanced view of the situation without apparent ideological slant.
The Department of Labor reported that only 187,000 people filed new claims for unemployment insurance benefits in the latest week, marking the lowest level since September 1969. This suggests a significantly lower rate of layoffs in the current economy compared to historical trends. While some analysts attribute this to seasonal factors, others argue that the data indicates a strong labor market with fewer job losses. However, the article notes that this low layoff rate does not necessarily reflect the broader employment landscape, as entry-level job postings have declined since 2022, while senior-level positions remain stable. The findings challenge predictions that widespread AI-driven layoffs are imminent, prompting calls for reevaluation of how economic changes might impact employment.
Bias read (Center): The article presents data showing low layoff rates but does not take a clear ideological stance on the implications of AI on employment. It cites both economic experts and reports from organizations like Oxford Economics and Indeed, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring either pro
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
United States
