The article reports on a police intervention in Kaštel where 18 British youths were fined for disturbing the peace with loud music and shouting. The incident occurred after residents reported noise complaints at midnight. Police confirmed the disturbance, stopped the gathering, and issued fines under the law against public order violations. This was not an isolated case, as similar interventions occurred eight times in seven days. Authorities warn that such disturbances will continue to be addressed during the tourist season and urge property owners to inform guests about local rules to prevent future issues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of police action without overt ideological slant. It emphasizes the legal response to noise complaints and includes both the perspective of affected residents and the authorities' warnings. There is no clear favoritism toward either side, and the tone remains客观
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the police intervention, citing the number of British nationals involved, the charges, and the broader pattern of similar incidents. It provides specific details like time, location, and legal basis for penalties. Objectivity is slightly lower due to the tone suggestin






