The Ministry of Culture has rejected RTVS's request for funds due to the absence of a legal basis, according to recent developments. The ministry stated that it had to reject the request because there was no legal foundation for the allocation of funds intended for musical production. In order to resolve this issue, the ministry issued an additional decision last week. According to the updated decision, RTVS will submit a proposed contract this week.
The head of RTVS’s management, Natalija Gorščak, has been invited by the ministry to attend a meeting in the coming week to discuss unresolved questions regarding the budgetary financing of the public institution within the ministry’s jurisdiction. Gorščak informed the RTVS board about the rejection of the request during a session on Wednesday. The discussion among board members took place behind closed doors. After the session ended, RTVS confirmed to STA that the management remains in contact with the ministry and ongoing discussions are taking place.
The ministry explained that the request received on June 16 had to be rejected on June 22 because it did not comply with the third point of the decree issued by the ministry. This point specifies that funds belonging to RTVS for the period from January 1 to the date of the decree's finality should be allocated as a single lump sum upon the decree's finality. In order to quickly address and ensure a legal basis for funding the part of musical production not financed by the RTV contribution, the decree was supplemented with a clause stating that the basis for allocating funds is a contract between RTVS and the ministry.
The question of signing a contract has been a point of contention since spring. The Ministry of Culture, even under the previous government, believed that a contract must be signed to receive funds, while RTVS management maintained that additional contractual arrangements with the state, which is the founder of the institution, were unnecessary. The amendment to the law on RTVS, adopted by the National Assembly in December last year, regulates the co-financing of musical production from the state budget. It stipulates that musical production from the state budget will be co-financed at four percent of the value of the collected RTV contribution annually. This amounts to approximately four million euros, officials from the ministry said when the amended law was adopted in the National Assembly.
RTVS remains without approximately 14 million euros in budgetary funds. Management is preparing liquidity measures, and employees are warning about uncertainty regarding salaries. On Wednesday afternoon, the management of RTVS informed the board that the Ministry of Culture had again rejected the request for the payment of part of the funds that should belong to the public institution according to Article 30 of the law on RTVS. The head of RTVS management, Natalija Gorščak, told the board members that despite the rejection of the request, the management is still in contact with the ministry and discussions are ongoing. She acknowledged that the management is also preparing a plan in case the money does not come. In situations where the payment is not guaranteed, it makes sense to prepare a scenario for ensuring liquidity. The discussion about possible measures took place behind closed doors during the board meeting. The RTVS board is expected to get more detailed information about these measures at a meeting at the beginning of next month.
Financial uncertainty among employees is growing. The Workers' Council of RTVS held a meeting on June 17, expecting the management to provide concrete information about the financial situation of the institution and assurances that salaries would be paid in future months. According to unofficial but reliable information, it was possible to hear warnings at meetings inside the media building that difficulties in securing funds for paying employee salaries could arise as early as September. These reports have not yet been confirmed by RTVS. The risk of liquidity problems was also recently warned about by Robert Pajek, president of the workers' council. According to the worst-case scenario, the institution could become unable to pay salaries after the August salary payments. Therefore, employees expect the management to provide a clearer picture: whether the state will indeed pay the funds foreseen by the law, and what will happen if the money does not arrive.
5 reports
DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 953 days agoThe Ministry of Culture in Slovenia has rejected a request by Radio Televizija Slovenija (RTVS) for approximately four million euros to fund music production, stating there was no legal basis for the payment. The ministry explained that the funds were not allocated in accordance with a decision issued at the beginning of June, which outlines how funds belonging to RTVS should be disbursed. To address this, the ministry amended the decision with a clause referencing a contract between RTVS and the ministry, which was finalized on June 23. However, RTVS’s management remains skeptical about signing such a contract, arguing that additional contractual arrangements with the state as the law-giving entity are unnecessary. Meanwhile, a new law passed by the National Assembly last December provides for state funding of music production through a four percent share of the RTV levy, but RTVS has yet to receive these funds.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the stance of both the Ministry of Culture and RTVS without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the legal and procedural arguments from both institutions, highlighting the disagreement over the necessity of a contract for funding. While the issue involves governmental vs
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 95): The article accurately reports the ministry's explanation regarding the lack of legal basis for RTVS's funding request, citing specific dates and procedural details. It remains largely neutral in tone, though slightly more formal.
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 97Objective 944 days agoThe Ministry of Culture has rejected RTVS's request for funds related to musical production due to the lack of a legal basis. In response, the ministry issued an amended decision last week to resolve the issue. RTVS plans to submit the proposed contract to the ministry this week in accordance with the updated decision. The head of RTVS's management, Natalija Gorščak, was informed by the ministry of a meeting scheduled for next week to address open questions regarding the budgetary financing of the public institution within the ministry's jurisdiction. Despite the rejection of the funding request, RTVS confirmed ongoing communication with the ministry. The ministry explained that the request received on June 16 had to be rejected on June 22 because it did not comply with the third point of the decision's clause, which specifies that funds for RTVS for the period from January 1 to the enforceability of the decision should be allocated in a single lump sum upon the decision becoming final. To quickly establish a legal basis for funding the musical production not covered by the RTV contribution, the decision was amended with a provision stating that the basis for allocating funds is a
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation between the Ministry of Culture and RTVS in a balanced manner, detailing both parties' positions and actions without apparent bias toward either side. It provides factual information about the legal basis for funding decisions and the steps taken by both entities.
Why these scores (Factual 97 · Objective 94): The article provides detailed information about the legal framework and the proposed contract, aligning closely with the cross-source consensus. The tone is slightly more analytical but still objective overall.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 96Objective 934 days agoThe Ministry of Culture rejected a request by RTVS (Radio Televizija Slovenija) for funds related to music production, stating there was no legal basis for the claim. The ministry explained that the request, submitted on June 16th, was denied on June 22nd because it did not comply with the third point of the decision issued by the ministry. In response, the ministry issued a supplementary decision last week, which outlines that funding for non-RTV-funded music production requires a contract between RTVS and the ministry. RTVS has been in discussions with the ministry despite the rejection, and a meeting between RTVS management and the ministry is planned. The issue stems from differing views between the previous government and RTVS regarding the need for a formal agreement. A new law passed in December 2025 sets the framework for state funding of music production at four percent of annual RTV contributions, approximately four million euros.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the positions of both the Ministry of Culture and RTVS without overtly favoring either side. It explains the legal reasoning behind the ministry’s rejection of the funding request and highlights the historical disagreement over contractual obligations. While the article mentions
Why these scores (Factual 96 · Objective 93): The article accurately summarizes the situation, including the timeline and the ministry’s reasoning. It includes some minor stylistic elements but remains mostly factual and balanced.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 924 days agoThe Ministry of Culture has rejected RTV Slovenia's request for funds related to musical production due to the lack of a legal basis. To resolve this issue, the ministry issued an amended decision last week. RTV Slovenia plans to submit a contract proposal based on the updated decision this week. The board of directors of RTV Slovenia, led by Natalija Gorščak, has proposed a meeting next week to address open questions regarding the budgetary financing of the public institution under the ministry's jurisdiction. Despite the rejection, RTV Slovenia remains in contact with the ministry, and discussions continue. The ministry explained that the request received on June 16 had to be rejected on June 22 because it did not comply with the third point of the decision's clause, which states that funds for RTV Slovenia for the period from January 1 to the enforceability of the decision must be allocated in a single lump sum upon the decision becoming final. To quickly establish a legal basis for funding the musical production not covered by the RTV contribution, the decision was amended with a clause specifying that the basis for allocating funds is a contract between RTV and the ministry.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—RTV Slovenia's request for funds and the Ministry of Culture's rejection based on legal grounds. It includes quotes from both parties and explains the background of the dispute over the need for a contract. There is no evident bias toward either side.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 92): The article presents the facts clearly and consistently with other sources, though it includes some formatting elements typical of media outlets. Its tone is slightly less neutral due to its association with RTVS.
STA – Slovenska tiskovna agencijaState / PublicCenterFactual 94Objective 904 days agoThe Ministry has rejected RTVS's request for funds due to the absence of a legal basis. This decision comes amid ongoing discussions regarding the funding structure and operational autonomy of RTVS, Slovenia's public broadcaster. The rejection highlights potential tensions between the government and public broadcasting institutions over financial support and regulatory compliance. RTVS has previously faced scrutiny over its governance and funding mechanisms, which are critical to maintaining its independence and fulfilling its public service mandate. The lack of a clear legal framework for allocating funds may complicate future operations and raise questions about the sustainability of public broadcasting in Slovenia.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the Ministry's decision to reject RTVS's funding request, citing the absence of a legal basis. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the procedural and legal aspects of the
Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 90): As a brief summary from an official news agency, the article is accurate but lacks depth compared to others. It remains neutral but is more concise than the longer analyses.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
