ON
← Back to feed
Sony Music and Warner's billion-dollar lawsuit against Anthropic
Germany🏛️ PoliticsProgressive18 hr. ago

Sony Music and Warner's billion-dollar lawsuit against Anthropic

Sony Music Publishing und Warner Chappell Music, zwei der drei großen Major-Labels, haben in den USA eine Multimilliarden-US-Dollar-Klage gegen Anthropic eingereicht. Die Klage konzentriert sich insbesondere auf die Nutzung von Songtexten durch Anthropics KI-Modell Claude, wobei die Labels behaupten, dass dies Urheberrechtsverstöße darstellt. Sie verweisen auf einen früheren Vergleich zwischen Anthropic und Buchautoren sowie Verlagen über 1,5 Milliarden US-Dollar, der jedoch keinen Präzedenzfall setzte. Die Klage fordert Schadensersatz von bis zu 150.000 US-Dollar pro Musikstück und zusätzliche Zahlungen bei fehlender Rechteverwaltungsinformation. Zudem wirft man Anthropic vor, Trainingsdaten über Torrents zu beschaffen und urheberrechtlich verbotene Inhalte zu nutzen. Die Kläger fordern Zugriff auf Trainingsdaten und die Entfernung aller urheberrechtlich geschützten Inhalte aus diesen Daten. Gegen Anthropics CEO Dario Amodei und Mitbegründer Benjamin Mann wird ebenfalls vorgegangen, wobei letzterer angeblich bereits 2021 Bücher von einer Schattenbibliothek heruntergeladen haben soll.

Two major music labels, Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell Music, have filed a multi-billion-dollar lawsuit against Anthropic in U.S. federal court in Northern California. The legal action centers around allegations that Anthropic's AI model, Claude, has infringed upon copyright protections related to song lyrics. The lawsuit was submitted last Friday and includes multiple claims, with the primary focus being on the unauthorized use of copyrighted text material. The case draws parallels to a previous settlement involving Anthropic and authors and publishers of books. In that instance, Anthropic reached an agreement with book authors and their publishing houses for $1.5 billion. However, this did not result in a formal court ruling, meaning it does not set a binding precedent. According to the complaint, such settlements are considered routine business expenses for the company because its overall business model allegedly relies on copyright infringement. Sony and Warner argue that Anthropic’s practices involve widespread violations of intellectual property rights. They claim that through clever prompts, Claude can reproduce hundreds of song lyrics. The lawsuit demands compensation totaling several billions of dollars, though the exact figure is not specified. The plaintiffs seek up to $150,000 in damages per musical piece. Additional penalties apply when metadata, information typically included in digital music files to identify the author and rights holder, is bypassed. These additional charges could reach up to $25,000 per track. Four distinct claims form the basis of the lawsuit. One involves the disregard of copyright information embedded in digital music files. Two other points relate to the alleged use of torrent networks to acquire training data for Anthropic's AI models. A final accusation is direct copyright violation. Beyond monetary compensation, the plaintiffs demand access to Anthropic's training data sets. They also seek the removal of all content over which they hold rights from these datasets. The lawsuit targets not only the company itself but also its chief executive officer, Dario Amodei, and co-founder Benjamin Mann. According to the complaint, Mann downloaded five million books from a shadow library using BitTorrent in 2021. This method of acquiring content, which may not involve payment to rights holders, was central to the earlier litigation involving publishers and authors. Another two million books were reportedly obtained from another archive in the following year. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that Anthropic accessed licensed libraries containing song lyrics without making separate payments. Specific examples cited include MusixMatch and LyricFind. With this joint lawsuit from Sony and Warner, all three major global music companies, collectively known as the “Big Three”, are now aligned against Anthropic. Universal Music Group has already pursued similar legal action since 2023. In the new lawsuit, Sony and Warner describe the collection of all publicly available materials as “the largest and most brazen ongoing thefts of intellectual property in history.” The case highlights growing tensions between artificial intelligence developers and traditional media industries, particularly concerning the ethical and legal boundaries of using copyrighted material to train AI systems. As the legal battle unfolds, it remains unclear how courts will interpret the complex interplay between emerging technologies and existing copyright laws.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

heise online logoheise onlineIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7518 hr. ago
Sony Music and Warner's billion-dollar lawsuit against Anthropic

Sony Music Publishing und Warner Chappell Music, zwei der drei großen Major-Labels, haben in den USA eine Multimilliarden-US-Dollar-Klage gegen Anthropic eingereicht. Die Klage konzentriert sich insbesondere auf die Nutzung von Songtexten durch Anthropics KI-Modell Claude, wobei die Labels behaupten, dass dies Urheberrechtsverstöße darstellt. Sie verweisen auf einen früheren Vergleich zwischen Anthropic und Buchautoren sowie Verlagen über 1,5 Milliarden US-Dollar, der jedoch keinen Präzedenzfall setzte. Die Klage fordert Schadensersatz von bis zu 150.000 US-Dollar pro Musikstück und zusätzliche Zahlungen bei fehlender Rechteverwaltungsinformation. Zudem wirft man Anthropic vor, Trainingsdaten über Torrents zu beschaffen und urheberrechtlich verbotene Inhalte zu nutzen. Die Kläger fordern Zugriff auf Trainingsdaten und die Entfernung aller urheberrechtlich geschützten Inhalte aus diesen Daten. Gegen Anthropics CEO Dario Amodei und Mitbegründer Benjamin Mann wird ebenfalls vorgegangen, wobei letzterer angeblich bereits 2021 Bücher von einer Schattenbibliothek heruntergeladen haben soll.

Bias read (Progressive): Die Artikel stimmt klar auf die Position der Musikindustrie, die als etablierte, profitorientierte Interessenvertretung gilt. Die Framing betont die Rechtsverletzungen durch Anthropic, was als kritisch gegenüber KI-Unternehmen interpretiert werden kann. Es wird keine Balance zwischen Innovation und

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the core facts from the primary source document, including the joint lawsuit by Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell Music against Anthropic, the location of the court, and the legal claims. It references the prior Nashville case and mentions the potential statuto

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the information in a generally neutral tone but includes some subjective phrasing such as 'Urheberrechtsdiebstahl' (copyright theft) which frames the issue as intentional wrongdoing. It also simplifies complex legal concepts without providing sufficient context, which could infl

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories