During a live interview at Radio Mitre's booth at La Rural fair, Argentine President Javier Milei directly accused José Ignacio De Mendiguren, former minister under former president Raúl Alfonsín’s government and later a prominent industrialist, of having ruined the country. Milei called him a thief, stating he had caused damage amounting to $30 billion to the Argentine economy. The remarks came during a discussion on monetary emission and how political actions have allegedly robbed Argentinians of $45 billion over recent years. The incident occurred as Milei was speaking about the economic consequences of policies implemented by previous governments. He pointed out that in 2001, when the Duhalde administration ended the currency board system and removed the convertibility clause from banknotes, it stole $15 billion from citizens. Milei added that Cristina Kirchner similarly took $10 billion from the central bank’s reserves, contributing to his claim that politics has stolen $45 billion from Argentina in recent years. Milei emphasized that these actions were part of a broader strategy to push through reforms aimed at amending the Organic Law of the Central Bank of Argentina (BCRA). His goal with this reform is to prevent laws from being passed that could alter the fiscal deficit or challenge the head of the central bank due to economic policy differences. He noted that such reforms would require two-thirds majority support in both the Senate and Chamber of Deputies. As the interview continued, Milei reiterated his stance on the need to hold accountable those who pass laws that disrupt fiscal balance, warning they could end up imprisoned for illegal association. He also discussed the idea of implementing a shutdown mechanism, akin to the U.S. model, to stop spending when funds run out, questioning why the state does not adopt this approach. De Mendiguren served as Minister of Production from January to October 2002, during the period of devaluation following 11 years of currency board stability. After leaving government service, he became president of the Argentine Industrial Union (UIA), held national deputy positions, and worked under the administrations of Alberto Fernández and Cristina Kirchner. Later in the same interview, Milei urged people to confront individuals like De Mendiguren, saying that when someone like him appears, one should not hesitate to tell them how their actions destroyed lives after exiting the currency board system. He stated that all those responsible for the nation’s decline come forward to dictate what must be done. In addition to his comments on De Mendiguren, Milei expressed continued support for former Economy Minister Martín Adorni, calling him honest and innocent despite ongoing controversies surrounding his tenure. This statement contrasts sharply with his direct accusations against De Mendiguren, highlighting the varied nature of Milei’s public discourse regarding different political figures. Milei also presented proposals for reforming the Central Bank, describing it as a tool that enabled high-level political theft. These statements underscore his broader agenda to overhaul financial institutions and impose stricter controls on monetary policy to prevent further alleged mismanagement. Throughout the interview, Milei maintained a firm tone, emphasizing the necessity of holding politicians accountable for their economic decisions and advocating for structural changes to prevent future fiscal misconduct. His remarks reflect a growing trend within his administration to address perceived corruption and inefficiency in economic governance.
5 reports
La NaciónIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 85Objective 855 days agoPresident Javier Milei publicly accused former Minister José Ignacio De Mendiguren of ruining Argentina during his live interview at La Rural. Milei claimed that De Mendiguren, who served under President Adolfo Rodríguez Sáez Duhalde, was responsible for stealing $30 billion from Argentinians through economic policies. Milei also stated that the government under Duhalde stole $15 billion by ending currency convertibility in 2001, while Cristina Kirchner’s administration stole another $10 billion by withdrawing reserves from the central bank. Milei emphasized that these actions by politicians amounted to $45 billion in losses over recent years and argued for constitutional reforms to prevent future fiscal imbalances. He criticized the current system of money printing as equivalent to fraud and called for legislative changes to hold politicians accountable.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents Milei's strong accusations against De Mendiguren using emotionally charged language such as 'ladrón' ('thief') and 'arruinaste el país' ('you ruined the country'). The framing emphasizes Milei's narrative of political corruption and theft, with minimal counterbalance or context.
Why factuality (85): The article summarizes the highlights of Milei’s speech at La Rural, including direct quotes and descriptions of his remarks. It aligns with other articles and provides a comprehensive overview of the event, with no conflicting information among sources.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is positive and celebratory, highlighting Milei’s praise for the agricultural sector. While it remains factual, it emphasizes the significance of the speech in a favorable light.
La NaciónIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 607 days ago Javier Milei and his measures, live: the Fiscal Innocence 2′′ project and the proposals in CongressThe article covers several news items from Argentina. First, it reports on Governor Osvaldo Jaldo undergoing heart surgery and remaining hospitalized in Buenos Aires after experiencing intense pain and sweating. Second, it discusses economic uncertainty ahead of elections, noting that investors may withdraw as the election period approaches. Third, it mentions Patricia Bullrich and Federico Sturzenegger working together to advance legislation related to private property rights. Fourth, it notes that despite a low inflation rate, other economic and social indicators suggest the government needs to temper optimism and continue efforts. Finally, it reports on Facundo Leal, a former official under investigation for corruption, being granted home detention due to drug addiction.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple stories without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on both governmental actions (e.g., Jaldo’s hospitalization, legislative efforts by Bullrich and Sturzenegger) and economic concerns, while also covering legal matters involving a former official. The tone,
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Governor Osvaldo Jaldo undergoing heart surgery and being hospitalized, citing a medical report from the Italian Hospital. It provides specific details like the location, time frame, and symptoms, which align with typical reporting standards. However, there is no primary sourc
Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'el reloj corre' and 'ventana de oportunidad', which may imply urgency or bias towards certain economic actors. While the facts are presented neutrally, the language suggests a particular perspective on Argentina’s political and economic situat
PerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 20Objective 108 days agoThe article compares the selection processes of Argentina’s football coach Lionel Scaloni and President Javier Milei, contrasting their approaches to choosing individuals for leadership roles. It argues that Scaloni selects based on merit and ability, while Milei’s team includes many perceived 'worst' figures, including family members, former politicians linked to corruption, and individuals with questionable records. The piece criticizes Milei’s administration for prioritizing personal connections over competence, suggesting that his policies—such as dismantling the central bank and promoting market logic—are undermined by his choice of advisors. The tone implies that Scaloni’s approach fosters national unity through performance, whereas Milei’s political strategy risks further division and poor governance.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Milei’s political choices negatively, using loaded terms like 'mediocres,' 'corruption-linked,' and 'manipulators of data.' It contrasts his approach with Scaloni’s merit-based selection, implying that Milei’s leadership is flawed and self-serving. The critique leans left by align
Why factuality (20): The article mentions Scaloni and political figures, but it incorrectly frames the selection process of political leaders as analogous to football team selection. It misrepresents the content of the primary source document by conflating unrelated topics and making unfounded comparisons.
Why objectivity (10): The tone is satirical and dismissive, using hyperbolic language to criticize political choices. While it avoids overt bias, the overall approach is more polemic than objective reporting.
Página/12Party-alignedConservative9 hr. agoThe article reports that Argentine President Javier Milei continues to support his former ally, Adorni, describing him as 'honest and innocent.' The piece highlights Milei's ongoing endorsement of Adorni despite potential controversies, emphasizing Milei's personal assessment of Adorni's integrity.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Milei's continued support for Adorni in a positive light, using terms like 'honest' and 'innocent,' which align with conservative values. It emphasizes Milei's personal judgment over any formal investigation or evidence, suggesting a right-leaning perspective that prioritizes the
InfobaeIndependentConservative22 hr. agoIn an article published by Infobae, Argentina's President Javier Milei presented proposed reforms to the Central Bank. He criticized the institution as 'a tool that enabled the theft of high-level politics,' suggesting that the Central Bank has been used to facilitate corruption or mismanagement at the highest levels of government. The article highlights Milei's stance against the current system, emphasizing his vision for structural changes to the financial institution.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Central Bank as a corrupt institution that enables political wrongdoing, aligning with conservative critiques of state institutions. The language suggests a strong ideological position against the status quo, which is characteristic of right-leaning narratives. The emphasis on
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
AR
