President Zoran Milanović sharply criticized Minister of Internal Affairs Davor Božinović during his public appearance on Monday at the commemoration of the 160th anniversary of the Battle of Vis, held aboard the Croatian Navy’s ship Hrvatske ratne mornarice. Speaking to journalists after laying a wreath in the Adriatic Sea, Milanović expressed frustration over Božinović's handling of comments regarding General Tihomir Kundida, head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Croatia. The president called Božinović’s remarks “fakat me razočarao”, a colloquial expression meaning “he has disappointed me.” Milanović accused Božinović of undermining military discipline and national unity, particularly in relation to Kundida’s decision to prohibit Croatian soldiers from participating in the military parade in Paris. He described Božinović’s actions as politically motivated and inappropriate, stating that the minister had previously supported the ruling Social Democratic Party (SDP) while promoting its electoral success. “He sat on the table, lit a Marlboro, and claimed the SDP would win,” Milanović remarked, before adding that Božinović later shifted allegiance to the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). “That doesn’t work, Božinović. Such a person shouldn’t comment on what Kundida should do.” The president emphasized that the HDZ had mentioned Kundida in a “shameful” manner, suggesting that the party was attempting to undermine the general’s authority. Milanović warned that such behavior could lead to the dissolution of the armed forces, saying, “If we go down this path, the army will no longer exist.” He also threatened legal action against anyone who dared to interfere with Kundida, declaring, “Don’t touch Kundida, I’ll beat you like a laundryman even in Šestine.” In addition to criticizing Božinović, Milanović took issue with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković’s participation in the Paris parade. He argued that Plenković should not have sat behind Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić during the event, which he viewed as a symbolic alignment with Serbia rather than with France or European institutions. “They can march in parades and sit behind Vučić, but I wouldn’t agree to that,” Milanović said. He questioned the nature of the event itself, asking, “What kind of parade was that? What was the fortress?” He suggested that the arrangement reflected a special account between France and Serbia, implying political maneuvering rather than genuine cooperation. Milanović further criticized the broader political climate, accusing both Božinović and Plenković of acting inconsistently with national interests. He pointed out that the HDZ had been critical of Kundida’s decisions, despite the government’s investment in the military. “This is how we’re becoming fools,” he said, referring to the country’s political instability. He reiterated that the military and police were priorities under the current government, emphasizing that the state must maintain control over its defense structures. Božinović, meanwhile, defended his stance on Kundida’s actions. In a separate statement, he acknowledged that Kundida had violated the law by preventing Croatian troops from joining the Paris parade. However, he argued that the decision was necessary to uphold military protocol and national security. Božinović stated that it was unreasonable for Kundida to refuse to attend a meeting with the prime minister, especially given the government’s substantial investments in the armed forces. “It’s incomprehensible that someone refuses to meet with the prime minister,” he said, noting that the current administration had invested more in the military than any previous one. Both leaders’ statements reflect deepening tensions within Croatia’s political landscape, with Milanović positioning himself as a defender of military integrity and national sovereignty, while Božinović defends the need for strict adherence to legal and institutional protocols. As the political season approaches, these clashes may intensify, shaping the direction of Croatia’s domestic and foreign policy in the coming months.
13 reports
Večernji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days agoHrvatski predsjednik Zoran Milanović, tokom obilježavanja 160. obljetnice Viškog boja, izrazio je oštre kritike prema ministru unutarnjih poslova Davoru Božinoviću i drugim političkim figurama. Milanović je naglasio da Božinović fakat razočarao, posebno zbog njegovih izjava o načelniku Glavnog stožera Tihomire Kundidu, tvrdioci da su takvi komentari neprikladni i mogli dovesti do slabosti vojske. Također je kritikovao raspored uzvanika tijekom vojnog mimohoda u Parizu, izjavivši da hrvatski premijer Ante Plenković nije trebao sjediti iza srpskog predsjednika Aleksandra Vučića. Milanović je također izrazio sumnje prema vojnom mimohodu u Francuskoj, smatrajući ga pripremom za mogući sukob s Rusijom, i izrekao oštre reči prema Macronu.
Bias read (Progressive): Milanović je kritikovao političare iz desničarske stranke HDZ, posebno Davora Božinovića, i izrazio je podršku za SDP. Korištenje izraza poput 'fakat razočarao', 'ne može tako', i 'vojska više ne postoji' pokazuje negativnu perspektivu prema desničarskim političarcima. Također je izrazio sumnje prem
Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys Milanović's statements about the military parade and his criticisms of Božinović. It aligns with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone while presenting Milanović's views, avoiding overt bias despite the strong language used.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days agoPresident Zoran Milanović attended the 160th anniversary ceremony of the Battle of Vis on Monday, laying a wreath at sea from a ship of the Croatian Navy. During his remarks to journalists, he addressed current issues including the military parade in Paris and internal politics. When asked about the SDP and Možemo campaign, Milanović stated it was their campaign and he would not comment further, emphasizing that politics is an art form. Regarding the Paris parade, he expressed no objection to Macron's event but criticized Croatia's involvement, calling it preparation for war against Russia, which he believes is unnecessary. He accused Božinović, the Minister of Internal Affairs, of disappointing him and criticized HDZ for mentioning Kundida in a disrespectful manner, warning them not to provoke him.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents President Milanović's strong criticism towards HDZ and Božinović, using emotionally charged language such as 'fakat me razočarao' (he really disappointed me) and 'oprat ću vas kao pralja' (I will wash you like a dish). The framing emphasizes Milanović's disapproval of HDZ's and,
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Milanović's comments on the military parade and his criticisms of Božinović. It aligns with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone while quoting Milanović's strong opinions, maintaining a balance between reporting and presenting viewpoints.
tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days agoPredsjednik Zoran Milanović, tokom obilježavanja 160. obljetnice Viškog boja, dao je izjave o aktualnim političkim temama, uključujući kampanju SDP-a i platforme Možemo, kao i nedavni vojni mimohod u Parizu. Milanović je kritikovao vojnu aktivnost u Parizu, smatrajući je pripremom za sukob s Rusijom, i izrazio frustraciju prema premijeru Andreju Plenkoviću i ministru unutarnjih poslova Davoru Božinoviću, tvrdioci da su njihove akcije neprikladne i neprofesionalne. Kritikovao je Božinovića zbog njegovih izjava o Kundidu i promjena stranke, uz usporedbu s radom profesaora Opštenarodne obrane.
Bias read (Progressive): Milanović je kritikovao Božinovića i Plenkovića kroz povratne reference i osudnu logiku, koristeći negativne prigode i smanjenje profesionalnosti. Iako nije direktno izrazio političku podršku, njegovo ponašanje prema rivalima i kritika njihovih strategija pokazuje levi naglašen pristup. Kritika vojn
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Milanović's criticisms of Božinović and his views on the military parade. It aligns with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone while quoting Milanović's strong opinions, avoiding overt bias despite the strong language used.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8512 days agoPredsjednik Republike Zoran Milanović objasnio je da će sudjelovati u obilježavanju 160. obljetnice Viškog boja, uključujući položenje vijenca u more s broda Hrvatske ratne mornarice. Na pitanje o kampanji stranke SDP-a i Možemo, Milanović je naglasio da to nije njegovo područje i da ne može komentirati. U vezi s događajima u Parizu, izjavio je da se protivi pripremi za rat protiv Rusije, smatrajući da nema opasnosti od rata. Također je kritikovao Božinovića, tvrdeći da ga je razočarao, a ističe da su Hrvata zvali 'budale' u kontekstu suradnje Francuske i Srbije. Milanović je izrazio nezadovoljstvo prema situaciji gdje države kao što su Francuska i Srbija djeluju zajedno, smatrajući da to ne treba da se dogodi.
Bias read (Progressive): Milanović kritikuje suradnju Francuse i Srbije, izražava nezadovoljstvo prema političkim partnerstvima koje smatra neprihvatljivima, i izražava individualističku poziciju koja se suprostavlja centralnom liderstvu (Vučić). Kritika Božinovića i izraze poput 'ispadamo budale' pokazuju tendenciju ka krt
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Milanović's statements about the parade in Paris, his criticism of Plenković and Božinović, and his comments on Kundid. It cites Dnevnik.hr as the source, aligning closely with the primary document.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but includes some direct quotes from Milanović that may reflect his personal views rather than objective reporting.
Net.hrIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 8515 days ago And Božinović fired at Kundida: 'He rejected the government that invested the most in the army'Ministar unutarnjih poslova Davor Božinović komentarisao je zabranu načelnika GSOS-a Tihomira Kundida kojoj je zabranjeno da hrvatski vojnici sudjeluju na mimohodu u Parizu, tvrditeći da je Kršio zakon. U kontekstu izjave premijera Andreja Plenkovića o gubitku povjerenja u Kundida i 'zategnutim' odnosima s predsjednikom države, Božinović je naglasio da su napravljene greške koje nisu trebale nastati. Nije shvatio da Kundid ne želi doći na sastanak s predsjednikom Vlade, koja je investirala više u vojsku nego ikad ranije. Istaknuo je da su Hrvatska vojska i policija prioriteti Vlade, a da se Dan pobjede i Dan branitelja ne smatra političkim događajima.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikl je okretan prema lijevoj strani, ali je okretan prema desnoj strani. Božinović je naglašavao investicije Vlade u vojsku kao prioritet, što se smatra desnim pozicijom. Naglašava se važnost vojske i sigurnosti, a ističe se da su političari koji promoviraju takve politike u skladu s desnom ideol
Why factuality (95): The article accurately presents Božinović's statements regarding Kundid's actions and his criticism of the decision not to send military personnel to the parade. It aligns with the primary source material.
Why objectivity (85): While the article is mostly factual, it leans slightly towards supporting Božinović's perspective without providing counterpoints.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8517 days agoThe article discusses the conclusion of Croatia's spring session of parliament, where lawmakers from the HDZ and SDP parties, Nikola Mažar and Arsen Bauk, analyzed various topics. The focus was on Croatia's participation in the military parade in Paris, where Prime Minister Andrej Plenković was seated close to French President Emmanuel Macron, according to HDZ representative Mažar. This seating arrangement was interpreted as a reflection of diplomatic relations, with Mažar noting that Plenković's position was closer to Macron than any other European leader. Bauk addressed internal political tensions regarding the role of the military in international affairs and the division of authority between the president and the prime minister. He emphasized that the government acted within its capacity to promote its policies abroad. The discussion also touched on the functioning of the Constitutional Court and the selection of judges.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the seating arrangement at the Paris event as a significant political statement, emphasizing the proximity of Plenković to Macron over other leaders. It highlights the perceived diplomatic alignment and suggests a critique of the Serbian leadership under Vučić, which is presented,
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Milanović's criticisms of Božinović and his views on the military parade. It directly references the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely neutral in tone while quoting Milanović's strong opinions, maintaining a balance between reporting and presenting viewpoints.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8018 days ago A large military parade is being held in Paris.The article reports on France's Bastille Day celebrations in Paris, which included a large military parade and a symbolic joint flight by French and Ukrainian fighter jets. The event highlighted European unity and support for Ukraine, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy participating alongside French President Emmanuel Macron. Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić was seated in the first row near Zelenskyy. The parade also commemorated the victims of the terrorist attack in Nice in 2016, during which 86 people were killed. The event took place ahead of Macron's final presidential term and coincided with the World Cup semi-final between France and Spain.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the event as a demonstration of European unity and support for Ukraine, but does not take a clear ideological stance. It includes participation by multiple leaders and mentions both French and Ukrainian forces, suggesting a balanced approach. There is no overtly positive or负面 sl
Why factuality (95): The article accurately presents Božinović's statements regarding Kundid's actions and his criticism of the decision not to send military personnel to the parade. It aligns with the primary source material.
Why objectivity (80): While the article is mostly factual, it leans slightly towards supporting Božinović's perspective without providing counterpoints.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7518 days ago Serbian media in ecstasy: Look where Vučić sits and where Plenković!The article reports on the largest military parade in French history held in Paris to commemorate the Fall of the Bastille, a national holiday. The event, which marked the end of President Emmanuel Macron’s term, featured around 30 leaders of the 'Coalition of Willing' and included participation from Ukrainian troops and special police units from Croatia. Croatian special police officers joined the parade after Prime Minister Andrej Plenković faced criticism from President Zoran Milanović, who refused to send military personnel. Plenković attended the parade from a VIP section, seated behind Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, who was placed in the first row next to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Cypriot President Nicos Christodoulides. Serbian media celebrated this seating arrangement as a significant diplomatic victory for Belgrade, though the article notes that according to protocol, heads of state typically sit ahead of prime ministers.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the seating arrangement at the parade as a diplomatic success for Serbia, highlighting President Vučić's prominent position while contrasting it with the placement of Croatian and other European leaders. This portrayal suggests a positive spin on Serbia's international standing, a
Why factuality (90): The article provides factual details about the military parade in Paris, including participants and seating arrangements. However, it focuses more on the political implications rather than strictly factual reporting.
Why objectivity (75): The article has a clear bias towards highlighting the significance of Vučić's position over Plenković's, showing a lack of neutrality in presenting the event.
Jutarnji listIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 7015 days ago Božinović: Kundid broke the law and rejected the government that invested the most in the armyMinistar unutarnjih poslova Davor Božinović komentarisao je zabranu načelnika GSOS-a Tihomira Kundida kojoj je zabranjeno da hrvatski vojnici sudjeluju na mimohodu u Parizu, tvrditeći da je Kundid kršio zakon. U kontekstu izjave premijera Andreja Plenkovića o gubitku povjerenja u Kundida i 'zategnutim' odnosima s predsjednikom države, Božinović je naglasio da su napravljene greške koje nisu trebale nastati. On je istaknuo da su vojska i policija prioriteti Vlade, a da se u slučaju događaja poput Oluje ne smije pojaviti politizacija. Božinović je također primijetio da su donacije HDZ-a transparentne i da se provode prema zakonu.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikl je okretan prema konzervativnim vrijednostima, naglašava važnost vojske kao prioriteta vlade, kritizira političku odluku Kundida kao protivstavu vladskim ciljevima i podcrtava važnost nacionalnog jedinstva. Korištenje izraza kao 'kršio zakon', 'neshvatljivo', 'prioriteti Vlade' i 'jedinstvo'柞
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on Božinović's criticism of Kundid regarding the Paris military parade. It provides specific details about the incident and quotes Božinović directly, aligning closely with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while reporting on the controversy. It presents Božinović's perspective without overtly favoring either side, though some language could be seen as slightly supportive of the government position.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 7015 days ago Bozinovic: Kundid broke the law and rejected the government that invested the most in the militaryMinistar unutarnjih poslova Davor Božinović komentarisao je zabranu načelnika GSOS-a Tihomira Kundida kojoj je zabranjeno da hrvatski vojnici sudjeluju na mimohodu u Parizu, tvrditeći da je Kundid kršio zakon. Božinović je naglasio da je Vlada koja je najviše investirala u vojsku, i da je toliko investirala u modernizaciju vojske da se to ne može usporediti s bilo kojom prethodnom vladom. U vezi s tim, Božinović je izrazio frustraciju što Kundid odbijanje doći na sastanak s predsjednikom Vlade. Također je naglasio važnost dana pobjede i jedinstva građana, kao i transparentnost donacija koje je HDZ primio.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikl koristi izraze poput 'najviše investirala u vojsku', 'planovi za daljnje investiranje u modernizaciju', 'prioriteti Vlade', i 'jedinstvo građana', što sugerira podršku centraliziranoj vlasti i nacionalnim interesima. Naglašava se važnost vojske i sigurnosti, što je tipična pozicija desničarsk
Why factuality (90): The article gives factual information about the military parade and the seating arrangement at the ceremony. However, it interprets the protocol in a way that supports HDZ's stance.
Why objectivity (70): The article shows a clear bias in favor of HDZ by emphasizing the protocol benefits for Vučić and downplaying Plenković's position.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 6012 days agoPresident Zoran Milanović attended the 160th anniversary celebration of the Battle of Vis, laying a wreath at sea from a ship of the Croatian Navy. When asked about the campaign of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and the 'Možemo' movement, he stated it was their campaign and declined to comment further, emphasizing that politics is an art form involving style and content. He criticized the military parade in Paris, suggesting it was orchestrated by someone who wanted conflict with Russia, but noted Croatia has no such threat. Milanović expressed disappointment in Minister of Internal Affairs Davor Božinović, who had called out General Tihomir Kundid for allegedly violating laws by preventing Croatian soldiers from participating in the parade. Milanović recalled past interactions with Božinović, noting his previous behavior and transition to the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ). He warned against discussing Kundid’s actions, implying severe consequences if continued. Milanović argued that the situation involves a special relationship between France and Serbia, criticizing the seating arrangement of leaders during the parade.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from President Milanović regarding political campaigns, military actions, and internal affairs minister Božinović. It includes direct quotes and does not show clear bias toward any side, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (90): The article closely follows the primary source document, accurately reporting Milanović's criticisms of Božinović and the events surrounding the Paris parade. It includes direct quotes and contextualizes the conflict between Milanović and Božinović effectively. Minor omissions exist but do not signi
Why objectivity (60): The article has a clear bias in favor of Milanović, using emotionally charged language such as 'fakat me razočarao' (he really disappointed me) and making personal attacks on Božinović. This undermines neutrality and suggests an agenda rather than objective reporting.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 5512 days ago Milanovic attacked Božinovic: "I was disappointed in the fact...President Zoran Milanović criticized Minister Božinović during a ceremony commemorating the 160th anniversary of the Battle of Vis. Milanović accused Božinović of disappointing him and made remarks about Božinović’s past actions within the Social Democratic Party (SDP), including his behavior while discussing military matters. He also commented on the parade in Paris, suggesting it was a provocation against Russia and criticizing the positioning of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić behind Croatia’s Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. Milanović warned against further provocations and emphasized the importance of maintaining national unity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the statements of President Zoran Milanović, who is associated with the center-left Social Democratic Party (SDP). The framing emphasizes criticism of a minister and comments on foreign relations, which align with left-leaning perspectives on national sovereignty and opposition.
Why factuality (88): The article provides a detailed account of Milanović's public remarks, aligning closely with the primary source. It accurately conveys his criticisms of Božinović and the Paris parade incident. Some minor details are omitted, but the core facts are well-represented.
Why objectivity (55): The article strongly favors Milanović's perspective, using aggressive language ('oprati ću vas kao pralja') and personal jabs at Božinović. The tone is highly biased, lacking balance and presenting the situation as a clear-cut conflict where Milanović is justified in his criticisms.
Novi listIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7015 days agoMinistar unutarnjih poslova Davor Božinović komentarisao je zabranu načelnika GSOS-a Tihomira Kundida kojoj je prethodila izjava premijera Andreja Plenkovića o gubitku povjerenja u Kundida i 'zategnutim' odnosima s predsjednikom države. Božinović je tvrdio da je Kundid kršio zakon i da je neshvatljivo da ne želi doći na sastanak s premijerom, uz naglasavanje da je Vlada investirala više u vojsku nego bilo koja prethodna vlada. U vezi s proslavom Oluje u Kninu, Božinović je istaknuo da je Dan branitelja iznad svih političkih interesa i da građani moraju pokazati jedinstvo. Također je komentarisao više donacije koje je HDZ primio od lokalnih vlasti, naglašavajući transparentnost i poštovanje zakona.
Bias read (Conservative): Artikl je okretan prema konzervativnim interesima, naglašavajući investicije vlade u vojsku kao prioritet, kritiku prema Kundidu i njegovoj poziciji, te podršku HDZ-u u kontekstu donacija. Naglašava se važnost nacionalnog jedinstva i sigurnosti, što je tipično za desničarsku perspektivu.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Minister Božinović's comments regarding Kundid's alleged legal violation and his criticism of the prime minister. It includes direct quotes from Božinović and contextualizes the situation within the broader political landscape. However, it omits some nuances present in
Why objectivity (70): The article presents a one-sided perspective by focusing primarily on Božinović's statements and not adequately representing Milanović's viewpoint. The tone leans toward supporting Božinović's position, using phrases like 'neshvatljivo' (unacceptable) and emphasizing the government's investment in t
Croatia
