ON
← Back to feed
Mike Rogers said Abdul El-Sayed didn’t disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. Video shows he did
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter

Mike Rogers said Abdul El-Sayed didn’t disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. Video shows he did

During a town hall event in Caro, Michigan, on October 17, 2026, Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed was asked whether he would disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. El-Sayed responded by redirecting the question, comparing himself to John F. Kennedy, who faced similar scrutiny over his religious identity. El-Sayed emphasized that he is running for office as an American, not as a Muslim, and stated that the U.S. Constitution is his guiding principle. His response sparked debate, with his Republican opponent, Mike Rogers, claiming El-Sayed did not adequately disavow the group. However, later at another town hall on October 18, El-Sayed explicitly stated that he 'clearly condemned' the Muslim Brotherhood. The controversy highlights tensions around political figures' associations with groups designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government.

Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed accused President Donald Trump and his Republican rival Mike Rogers on Thursday night of weaponizing his Muslim faith as a political tool. Speaking in Marquette, Michigan, El-Sayed urged voters to evaluate his performance based on his actions and work rather than assumptions rooted in his religious practice. He stated that while he might pray differently than anyone else who has held the office, his commitment to the Constitution remains absolute. This direct pushback marks the closest El-Sayed has come on the campaign trail to explicitly labeling his opponents' tactics as Islamophobic. The controversy centers on recent amplification by Republicans of claims linking El-Sayed and his family to the Muslim Brotherhood. On Thursday night, Trump posted a video directly identifying El-Sayed as a member of the group, which was founded in Egypt. The current administration has designated certain chapters of the organization as terrorist entities. El-Sayed, an American of Egyptian descent, would become the first Muslim senator if elected. He expressed frustration that the debate focuses on his personal identity rather than the economic and social issues affecting constituents. He noted that his mother and sister are not candidates for office, whereas he is, and criticized the focus on them as irrational. A specific flashpoint occurred during a town hall in Caro, Michigan, on October 17. A male attendee asked El-Sayed if he would disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. Clips of the exchange circulated widely online. In the video, El-Sayed initially asked for the man's name and began discussing the U.S. Constitution. When the attendee pressed for a simple yes-or-no answer, El-Sayed replied affirmatively, stating he absolutely would disavow it. He then turned the question back to the attendee, questioning why such a query was necessary. El-Sayed argued that the question implied his Muslim faith created an allegiance superior to the Constitution. El-Sayed drew a parallel to John F. Kennedy, the first Catholic president, who faced similar scrutiny regarding his loyalty to the Pope. El-Sayed reiterated that he is not running to be a Muslim senator, but for the U.S. Senate, and happens to be Muslim. He described the Constitution as his guiding light. At a subsequent town hall on October 18, El-Sayed stated that he had clearly condemned the Muslim Brotherhood, describing the act of condemnation as straightforward. Republican challenger Mike Rogers disputed the characterization of El-Sayed's response. During an interview on October 18, Rogers claimed El-Sayed failed to provide a sufficient disavowal. Rogers described El-Sayed's remarks as evasive language designed to avoid a direct refusal. When a host pointed out that El-Sayed had verbally rejected the group, Rogers maintained that the manner of delivery was insufficient. Rogers argued that El-Sayed did not explicitly state concerns about the group's views on Sharia law or its treatment of women. Rogers' campaign spokesperson Alyssa Brouillet defended the strategy, asserting that dismissing an accusation is not the same as disavowing it. She cited El-Sayed's past writings and pledges, along with alleged family ties and financial donations to his campaign, as evidence of continued association. The campaign pointed to social media posts by El-Sayed's half-sister that appeared to reference their mother's involvement with the group. El-Sayed countered these claims by noting his parents divorced when he was three years old. He explained that he was raised by his father and stepmother and did not see his mother for years. Based on his knowledge, he stated that no one in his family has been a member of the organization. The Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamist movement established in Egypt in 1928 with branches throughout the Middle East. In 2025, the Trump administration designated specific branches as terrorist organizations. Additionally, the Treasury Department sanctioned a senior Egyptian leader of the group in July for alleged fundraising activities for Hamas. The questioner at the Caro town hall was identified as Thomas Teepell, who served as a staff member for Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri until earlier this year. Attempts to contact Teepell for comment yielded no response. Amidst the religious debate, El-Sayed released a new video targeting voters of faith, including Christians who constitute a significant portion of Rogers' base. In the advertisement, El-Sayed describes himself as a man of faith who prays daily, though he does not specify his religion. He emphasized service to God and neighbors, noting that many families in Michigan feel hopeless due to a lack of faith in Washington. The video was shared alongside endorsements from an Instagram account featuring clergy from various traditions. One supporter, Rev. Shannon Jammal-Hollemans, highlighted the burden of healthcare costs on her congregation, noting that maintaining a church food pantry became more difficult as prices rose. Skepticism persists among some religious leaders. Pastor Lorenzo Sewell of 180 Church in Detroit questioned El-Sayed's suitability for the Senate, specifically citing the power to recommend federal judges. Sewell suggested that appointing judges aligned with El-Sayed could lead to the implementation of Sharia law across the country. El-Sayed's campaign has consistently stated that he opposes incorporating any religious rules into U.S. law. The race for Michigan's Senate seat remains tightly contested, with both candidates focusing intensely on defining the character and loyalties of the incoming legislator.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Semafor logoSemaforIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 70
El-Sayed pushes back at Republicans who judge him because he ‘might pray differently’

Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed responded to allegations from Republicans, including President Donald Trump and rival Mike Rogers, that his Muslim faith and potential ties to the Muslim Brotherhood make him unfit for office. El-Sayed denied these claims, stating that his commitment to the U.S. Constitution should be judged based on his actions rather than his religious practices. He criticized Republicans for focusing on his personal background instead of addressing broader issues facing voters. El-Sayed highlighted historical parallels, comparing the attacks on his loyalty to similar criticisms faced by Presidents John F. Kennedy and Barack Obama due to their respective religions. The article notes that right-wing social media discourse has increasingly targeted El-Sayed's faith since his victory in Michigan's primary.

Bias read (Center): The article presents El-Sayed's rebuttal to Republican claims and includes direct quotes from both El-Sayed and his critics. It provides historical context and references external analyses without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains balanced, avoiding loaded language or one-sided focus

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports El-Sayed's responses to GOP criticisms regarding his Muslim faith and alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. It includes direct quotes from El-Sayed and references to Trump's claims, aligning with the broader narrative presented in other sources. The details are consi

Why objectivity (70): The article leans slightly toward El-Sayed's perspective, emphasizing his rebuttals to GOP claims. While it attempts to present facts, the framing suggests a sympathetic view of El-Sayed and implicitly criticizes the GOP's approach, which affects its overall neutrality.

PolitiFact logoPolitiFactIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 60
Mike Rogers said Abdul El-Sayed didn’t disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. Video shows he did

During a town hall event in Caro, Michigan, on October 17, 2026, Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed was asked whether he would disavow the Muslim Brotherhood. El-Sayed responded by redirecting the question, comparing himself to John F. Kennedy, who faced similar scrutiny over his religious identity. El-Sayed emphasized that he is running for office as an American, not as a Muslim, and stated that the U.S. Constitution is his guiding principle. His response sparked debate, with his Republican opponent, Mike Rogers, claiming El-Sayed did not adequately disavow the group. However, later at another town hall on October 18, El-Sayed explicitly stated that he 'clearly condemned' the Muslim Brotherhood. The controversy highlights tensions around political figures' associations with groups designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both El-Sayed's and Rogers' perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both candidates and provides context about the Muslim Brotherhood's designation as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. The framing remains neutral, focusing

Why factuality (65): The article contains several inaccuracies. It incorrectly states that 'in 2025, President Donald Trump designated some branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations' when Trump left office in 2021 and no such designation occurred. The reference to the Treasury Department sanctioning

Why objectivity (60): The article exhibits bias in its framing of the exchange between El-Sayed and the attendee. It presents El-Sayed's response as evasive while portraying Rogers' interpretation as reasonable. The use of phrases like 'word salad' and the emphasis on El-Sayed being 'Muslim' suggest a biased narrative ra

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories