ON
← Back to feed
Miha Brejc is collecting signatures for the recall of Zoran Stevanovic
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives8/17/2026

Miha Brejc is collecting signatures for the recall of Zoran Stevanovic

Miha Brejc, nekoč član SDS, združuje podpise za odpoklic predsednika državnega zbora Zorana Stevanovića, kar je del širše kampanje za previdnost v političnem sistemu Slovenije. Brejc meni, da je treba pokazati, da je čas za njegovo odstopanje, in zbrati vsaj 10.000 podpisov. Ustavnopravni strokovnjaki, kot so Ciril Ribičič, Albin Igličar, Miro Cerar in Matej Avbelj, so ocenili, da koalicija in Resnica kršita ustavo s svojim ravnanjem, kar vodi do možnosti parlamentarne preiskave o aferi Black Cube. Medtem ko so bile dvakrat preprečene preiskave zaradi neuspešnega glasovanja o dnevnem redu, so strokovnjaki to označili za pravno praznino. Brejc zahteva, da Stevanović odstopi, da bi se podprlo podpisanje dnevnega reda in da se ustanovi preiskovalna komisija. Opozicijske stranke so že vložile zahtevo za razrešitev Stevanovića, a imajo dovolj glasov za uspešno izvajanje. Predsednik državnega zbora je dvakrat glasoval proti sprejetju dnevnega reda, kar je vodilo do preprečevanja preiskav, kar so strokovnjaki ocenili kot neposredno kršitev ustave.

Miha Brejc, former member of the Social Democrats (SDS) and long-time critic of right-wing politics, has launched a campaign to gather signatures for the removal of Zoran Stevanović, current president of the National Assembly (DZ). The initiative, hosted on his website stevogohome.si, aims to collect at least 10,000 signatures to demonstrate public support for Stevanović’s resignation. Brejc argues that the time has come for him to step down, citing repeated violations of constitutional procedures and concerns over the integrity of parliamentary processes. The controversy surrounding Stevanović escalated after he twice blocked the adoption of a special session agenda, preventing two parliamentary investigations into allegations related to the Black Cube scandal. These actions were widely condemned by legal experts, including constitutional lawyers Ciril Ribičič, Albin Igličar, Miro Cerar, and Matej Avbelj, who stated that the coalition and Resnica violated the constitution and the rules of procedure by refusing to approve the agenda. A separate legal expert, Rajko Pirnat, reached the same conclusion. They emphasized that if a required number of deputies, typically one-third of the total, demand an investigation, it must be carried out. However, this requirement was not met, leaving a legal gap regarding the rights of minority groups. Legal scholars from different ideological backgrounds have consistently pointed out that Stevanović's repeated refusal to allow the agenda to proceed represents a direct breach of the constitution. This pattern of behavior, they argue, has created a precedent that undermines democratic principles. In particular, they noted that the failure to hold the scheduled sessions has effectively prevented the necessary oversight mechanisms from functioning. The situation has been described as a “constitutional vacuum,” with the only available sanction being political pressure. Brejc’s campaign calls for three specific measures: Stevanović should immediately resign from his position as president of the National Assembly; all opposition parties, including the Freedom Party, SD, and Left, should support the agenda during the first session following summer recesses; and a commission should be established to investigate the Black Cube affair. These demands reflect broader frustrations within the political community, particularly among those who believe that the current leadership has failed to uphold democratic norms. Earlier this year, opposition parties had already submitted a request for Stevanović’s removal, but they lacked the necessary majority to succeed. To trigger such a move, they would need at least 46 votes from members of parliament, a threshold they currently do not meet. However, Brejc’s campaign seeks to mobilize public opinion to apply additional pressure on the ruling coalition. Stevanović’s tenure as president of the National Assembly has been marked by repeated clashes with the opposition. He has repeatedly used his voting power to block proposed agendas, effectively stalling legislative proceedings. His actions have drawn criticism from both legal experts and political analysts, who argue that his conduct reflects a disregard for democratic accountability. Some have compared his behavior to past controversies involving high-profile figures, including Roman Jeglič, who once caused a major scandal by exposing the dismissal of Miha Brejc from his position at the Institute for Security Studies (VIS). As the campaign gains momentum, the focus will shift toward whether enough public support can be gathered to force a change in leadership. With parliamentary elections approaching, the issue could become even more politically charged. For now, Brejc continues to call for action, urging citizens to take part in the effort to restore trust in the institution.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 758/17/2026
Miha Brejc is collecting signatures for the recall of Zoran Stevanovic

Miha Brejc, nekoč član SDS, združuje podpise za odpoklic predsednika državnega zbora Zorana Stevanovića, kar je del širše kampanje za previdnost v političnem sistemu Slovenije. Brejc meni, da je treba pokazati, da je čas za njegovo odstopanje, in zbrati vsaj 10.000 podpisov. Ustavnopravni strokovnjaki, kot so Ciril Ribičič, Albin Igličar, Miro Cerar in Matej Avbelj, so ocenili, da koalicija in Resnica kršita ustavo s svojim ravnanjem, kar vodi do možnosti parlamentarne preiskave o aferi Black Cube. Medtem ko so bile dvakrat preprečene preiskave zaradi neuspešnega glasovanja o dnevnem redu, so strokovnjaki to označili za pravno praznino. Brejc zahteva, da Stevanović odstopi, da bi se podprlo podpisanje dnevnega reda in da se ustanovi preiskovalna komisija. Opozicijske stranke so že vložile zahtevo za razrešitev Stevanovića, a imajo dovolj glasov za uspešno izvajanje. Predsednik državnega zbora je dvakrat glasoval proti sprejetju dnevnega reda, kar je vodilo do preprečevanja preiskav, kar so strokovnjaki ocenili kot neposredno kršitev ustave.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for the removal of Zoran Stevanović as a necessary step to uphold constitutional integrity and democratic processes. It emphasizes the legal arguments against his actions, supported by constitutional experts, which aligns with progressive values. The focus on systemic and

Why factuality (80): The article provides detailed information about Brejc’s petition, including the number of signatures sought and the legal requirements for removing the Speaker. It cites legal experts and mentions the political implications of the petition. The facts are consistent with other reports and are clearly

Why objectivity (75): While the article includes some criticism of Stevanović, it maintains a relatively neutral tone and focuses on presenting the facts surrounding the petition. There is minimal editorializing, and the language remains professional and balanced.

Reporter logoReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 658/17/2026
Miha Brejc is collecting signatures for the recall of Zoran Stevanovic

Former European Parliament member Miha Brejc has called for the resignation of Zoran Stevanović, the president of the Slovenian National Council (DZ), by collecting signatures through a campaign on 'stevogohome.si'. Brejc criticizes Stevanović's leadership, claiming his actions harm Slovenia and accusing him of incompetence and corruption. In a June interview with Reporter, Brejc questioned the legitimacy of Stevanović's appointment, suggesting it may constitute political corruption. The article highlights ongoing criticism of Stevanović’s role in governance.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of Zoran Stevanović in a negative light, using terms like 'incompetent', 'corruption', and 'politically motivated' to describe his actions. The emphasis on calling for his resignation and the suggestion of political corruption align with left-leaning critiques of the

Why factuality (75): The article summarizes Brejc’s call for the removal of Stevanović and references past criticisms of him. It includes quotes from Brejc and mentions previous interviews. The information is consistent with other reports, though it relies more on direct quotes and less on broader contextual analysis.

Why objectivity (65): The title 'STEVO GO HOME!' is highly emotive and suggests a strong stance against Stevanović. This type of phrasing leans into a confrontational tone, reducing objectivity despite the factual content being largely accurate.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories