ON
← Back to feed
Miguel Wiñazki: "Philosophy is essential for journalism, because the data must be completed with the concept"
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressive17 days ago

Miguel Wiñazki: "Philosophy is essential for journalism, because the data must be completed with the concept"

Miguel Wiñazki, periodista y filósofo argentino, participó en un programa de radio y televisión donde habló sobre la importancia de la filosofía en el periodismo. Destacó que la filosofía le permite complementar los datos con conceptos, evitando que la información sea ciega o vacía. Wiñazki criticó a líderes como Donald Trump, Cristina Kirchner y Javier Milei por su 'antiperiodismo', que según él, busca construir enemigos para mantener el poder. También mencionó la necesidad de un periodismo ético basado en la búsqueda de la verdad, no en algoritmos ni en lo que la audiencia quiere escuchar. Además, destacó su contribución al periodismo argentino, incluyendo la fundación de la revista 'Noticias' y su participación en la Academia Nacional de Periodismo.

Miguel Wiñazki, a journalist and philosopher known for his work with Noticias, one of Argentina’s most influential newspapers, has spoken extensively about the role of philosophy in journalism. In a recent interview with Net TV and Radio Perfil, he emphasized that philosophy is essential to the practice of journalism because it complements data with concepts. He argued that while information is crucial, it must be enriched by conceptual frameworks to avoid being merely factual or superficial. This perspective comes amid growing concerns over the influence of artificial intelligence and the erosion of critical thinking in media. Wiñazki, who holds a degree in Philosophy from the University of Morón and completed postgraduate studies in Political Science at the University of Salamanca, has long been a vocal critic of leaders such as Donald Trump, Cristina Kirchner, and Javier Milei. These figures, he argues, share a common tendency to construct enemies to consolidate power, a phenomenon he calls “antiperiodism.” According to him, this approach undermines democratic values and the integrity of journalistic practice. The true purpose of journalism, he insists, lies not in catering to audience preferences or algorithmic trends, but in the ethical pursuit of truth, even when it is uncomfortable or inconvenient. The conversation took place during a broader discussion on the future of journalism in an increasingly digital world. Wiñazki described the current landscape as one where the human element is often sidelined by technology. He dismissed the idea that artificial intelligence could replace the nuanced understanding required for meaningful reporting. For him, AI functions more as a co-pilot than a creative force, incapable of grasping the complexities of street-level reality or generating genuine insight. His critique extends beyond mere technological limitations, it touches on deeper philosophical questions about the nature of knowledge and the role of the journalist as both observer and participant. Wiñazki’s views were shaped by his extensive career, which includes founding Noticias alongside other journalists and later working in tandem with his son within the same publication. His experience highlights the personal and professional dimensions of journalism, reinforcing the idea that it is not just a profession but a vocation rooted in intellectual rigor and emotional engagement. He also noted the importance of maintaining a dialogue with readers, describing it as a “pact of reading” that ensures transparency and mutual respect. This approach aligns with his belief that journalism should serve as a public forum for diverse perspectives rather than a monologue dictated by algorithms or political agendas. As part of his ongoing contributions to the field, Wiñazki currently serves as head of the advisory board for the Master's program in Journalism offered jointly by Clarín Group and the University of San Andrés. Over the years, he has observed how the field has evolved, particularly with the rise of digital platforms and new technologies. While acknowledging the changes, he stressed that the core mission of journalism, truth-seeking and societal reflection, remains unchanged. He believes that despite these transformations, the need for critical thought, ethical responsibility, and philosophical depth continues to be vital. In addition to his academic and professional roles, Wiñazki has played a key role in shaping the discourse around journalism in Argentina. His involvement with Noticias and the National Academy of Journalism underscores his commitment to fostering a culture of rigorous, independent reporting. Looking ahead, he anticipates further discussions on the intersection of philosophy and journalism, including upcoming conversations with foreign diplomats and scholars. These dialogues aim to strengthen the foundations of journalistic ethics and reaffirm its central role in democratic societies.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7217 days ago
Miguel Wiñazki: "Philosophy is essential for journalism, because the data must be completed with the concept"

Miguel Wiñazki, periodista y filósofo argentino, participó en un programa de radio y televisión donde habló sobre la importancia de la filosofía en el periodismo. Destacó que la filosofía le permite complementar los datos con conceptos, evitando que la información sea ciega o vacía. Wiñazki criticó a líderes como Donald Trump, Cristina Kirchner y Javier Milei por su 'antiperiodismo', que según él, busca construir enemigos para mantener el poder. También mencionó la necesidad de un periodismo ético basado en la búsqueda de la verdad, no en algoritmos ni en lo que la audiencia quiere escuchar. Además, destacó su contribución al periodismo argentino, incluyendo la fundación de la revista 'Noticias' y su participación en la Academia Nacional de Periodismo.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the critique of leaders like Trump, Cristina Kirchner, and Milei as part of a broader 'antiperiodismo' movement, which is portrayed as a deliberate strategy to build enemies and consolidate power. This framing aligns with progressive values that emphasize truth-seeking journalism,

Why factuality (85): The article presents Miguel Wiñazki as a journalist and philosopher who discusses the role of philosophy in journalism, referencing his academic background, works like 'La noticia deseada', and his involvement in founding the magazine 'Noticias'. It mentions his critique of leaders like Trump, Kirch

Why objectivity (72): The article maintains a generally respectful tone towards Wiñazki and his ideas, but it frames his critiques of political figures as part of a broader ideological stance ('autoritarios'). The language has a somewhat polemic edge when discussing political leaders, suggesting a bias toward supporting

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories