A Gujarat court has rejected a closure report submitted by a special investigation team (SIT) in the 2021 killing of a wanted criminal and his minor son during a police operation, ordering the registration of a criminal case against seven police officers. The decision comes after the court dismissed the SIT's "C Summary Report," which typically indicates that an investigation has concluded with no actionable charges. The judicial magistrate ordered the prosecution of the officers under sections 302 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, citing evidence that contradicted the police account of self-defense. The incident took place on November 6, 2021, in Gedia village within the Dasada taluka of Surendranagar district. According to the court's July 18 order, a team of police officers opened fire on Hanif Khan Malek, a wanted criminal, and his minor son, claiming they faced an attack by a mob during their attempt to arrest Malek. However, the family of the deceased, represented by Sohanaben, the wife of Hanif Khan, argued that the officers fired indiscriminately without provocation, resulting in the deaths of both men. Sohanaben filed a petition challenging the SIT's closure report, asserting that it aimed to shield the accused officers. Her legal representative, Punit Dave, stated that the court examined critical evidence, including forensic science laboratory (FSL) reports and testimonies from eyewitnesses present at the scene. These findings did not support the police claim of self-defense, leading the court to reject the closure report and issue summons for the seven officers to appear before it on August 8. The court's ruling followed a series of developments since the incident. Initially, no formal complaint or first information report (FIR) was filed against the officers, despite repeated attempts by the petitioner. Eventually, an FIR was registered against the seven officers in May 2025 upon the court's directive, prompting the formation of an SIT led by then Dhangadhra Deputy Superintendent of Police JD Purohit. The SIT submitted its C Summary Report two months later, but the court deemed it insufficient and ordered further legal proceedings. Eyewitness accounts and the FSL report played a crucial role in the court's decision. The FSL analysis reportedly indicated that the bullets used in the incident were inconsistent with the police narrative of being fired in self-defense. Additionally, the testimonies of witnesses who were present at the time of the shooting corroborated the family's claims of unprovoked gunfire. The court's rejection of the closure report marks a significant shift in the legal process surrounding the incident. It underscores the importance of thorough investigations and the need for accountability among law enforcement officials. The summons issued to the seven officers signals a potential trial, which could lead to serious consequences for those involved. The case highlights ongoing concerns regarding police conduct and the need for transparency in such incidents. As the legal proceedings move forward, the outcome will depend on the evidence presented and the credibility of the testimonies. The court's decision to proceed with the criminal case reflects a commitment to justice and due process, ensuring that all parties involved are held accountable for their actions.
5 reports
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 889 days agoA court in Gujarat's Surendranagar has rejected a closure report submitted by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) regarding the 2021 killing of a wanted criminal, Hanif Khan Malek, and his minor son during a police operation. The court ordered the registration of a criminal case against seven police officers under Sections 302 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The incident occurred in Gedia village when police claimed they were attacked by a mob while attempting to arrest Malek, but the victim's wife, Sohanaben, argued that the officers fired indiscriminately without provocation. The court dismissed the SIT's 'C-summary' report, citing forensic evidence and eyewitness accounts that contradict the police's self-defense claim. The seven officers are now required to appear before the court on August 8.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a legal proceeding involving police accountability and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on judicial actions and includes perspectives from both the petitioner and the police through the submission of a closure report
Why factuality (95): The article reports on a Gujarat court rejecting a closure report in a case involving the killing of a man and his minor son during a police operation. It provides details about the court's decision, the legal process, and the background of the incident. The information aligns with typical reporting
Why objectivity (88): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, focusing on the court's decision and the legal proceedings. However, it includes some emotionally charged language, such as 'gunned down' and 'without any provocation,' which may reflect the perspective of the petitioner rather than maintaining com
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8513 days agoA 55-year-old man named R. Govindasamy was arrested by the Virinchipuram police in Vellore for allegedly murdering his elderly neighbor, S. Ellaiammal (65), after she demanded repayment of ₹6,500 in borrowed money. The incident occurred after an argument on Saturday when Ellaiammal asked him to settle the debt following his weekly wages. According to police, Govindasamy attacked her with a stone and later burned her body in an open area before fleeing. Residents discovered the body and notified the authorities, leading to the arrest of Govindasamy through CCTV footage analysis. He confessed during interrogation and was remanded in judicial custody. The case is currently under further investigation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal act without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the legal proceedings and the circumstances surrounding the incident, providing balanced information without leaning toward any political agenda. The narrative remains neutral, emphasizing the警方
Why factuality (90): The article presents detailed information including names, locations, and a clear sequence of events supported by police statements. It aligns closely with other reports on similar incidents and provides a factual narrative based on official sources.
Why objectivity (85): The reporting remains neutral, presenting the facts without emotional bias or subjective interpretation. It maintains a balanced perspective throughout.
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8015 days ago 'Had gone just to ask for money': Accused in Delhi IRS officer's daughter's rape-murder tells copsDelhi Police has filed a 973-page chargesheet against Rahul Meena, a former domestic helper accused of raping and murdering a 22-year-old daughter of a senior IRS officer. The incident occurred on April 22 when Meena, who had been dismissed earlier for financial misconduct, entered the home using a spare key and raped the victim after demanding money. The victim, an IIT graduate preparing for civil services exams, was discovered by her parents upon their return from the gym and later died in the hospital. According to the chargesheet, Meena strangled the victim with a mobile phone charging cable, stole approximately ₹2.5 lakh, and fled dressed in the victim’s brother’s clothes. Forensic evidence including fingerprints and DNA matches confirmed his involvement, and 82 witnesses were identified. Meena was arrested based on CCTV footage showing his presence at the residence during the attack. During interrogation, he claimed he went to the house 'just to ask for money' and suggested the crime 'just happened.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal case without overt ideological slant. While the victim's family includes a senior IRS officer, the focus remains on the legal proceedings and forensic evidence rather than political commentary. The framing is neutral, emphasizing the investigation
Why factuality (90): This detailed article provides information from a police chargesheet, including the accused's background, method of attack, and forensic evidence. It aligns with standard reporting practices and corroborates details from other sources about the case. No contradictions are evident.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents facts in a neutral manner, citing police sources and providing context without overt bias. While it highlights the severity of the crime, it does so through objective reporting rather than emotive language.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago Metpally police arrest hired shooter from UP for attempting to murder woman over property disputeIn June 2026, a 21-year-old man named Sachin from Uttar Pradesh was arrested by Metpally police for allegedly attempting to murder Lakshmi, a woman involved in a property dispute. According to police, Sachin was hired by Gonela Shankar, his employer, along with Shankar's wife Anusha and a relative Muthaiah, to kill Lakshmi over a longstanding family conflict. Sachin, who worked as a JCB operator on Shankar's farm, was promised money to commit the act and fund his plans to travel abroad. During the attempted assassination on June 15, Sachin shot Lakshmi while she slept, missing her but striking her left cheek. She survived the injury. The case took a turn when doctors recovered the bullet from her face during surgery, leading to the discovery of the conspiracy through forensic and technical evidence. Sachin was located in Uttar Pradesh and arrested on July 20 before being transported to Metpally under a transit warrant and placed in judicial custody on July 24.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a criminal case involving a property dispute and attempted murder, without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the legal proceedings, investigative process, and the involvement of local authorities. There is no indication of partisan commentary or bias,
Why factuality (85): The article includes specific details about the dispute, the method of attack, and police actions. It aligns with other reports on neighborhood conflicts turning violent, though some details remain preliminary and unconfirmed.
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains objective, focusing on the facts of the dispute and police investigation without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 706 days ago Neighbours’ dispute turns fatal, youth hacked to death in ThiruvananthapuramA 42-year-old man named Vishakh was brutally murdered in Thiruvananthapuram, India, during a confrontation linked to a longstanding boundary dispute with his neighbor Pradeep. The incident occurred on Sunday afternoon outside Vishakh's home, where he was attacked by a group of four men using knives. The attackers fled in a rented vehicle, which was later found abandoned. Police arrested the suspects within hours, recovering weapons and liquor bottles from the vehicle. The dispute reportedly escalated after a prior altercation six months earlier, prompting community intervention but failing to prevent the fatal outcome. The accused are in police custody for further interrogation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a violent neighborhood dispute without overt ideological framing. While the incident involves local governance and law enforcement, there is no clear alignment with political parties or agendas. The focus remains on the legal process and community tensions,
Why factuality (75): The article provides a concise summary of the incident involving a property dispute and the use of a hammer. While it lacks detailed context, it aligns with the broader pattern of family-related crimes reported in other articles.
Why objectivity (70): The language is somewhat dramatic, highlighting the severity of the act without offering a balanced view or additional perspectives.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
India
