In a US trial in Tennessee, attorneys for the state argued that Meta Platforms knowingly ignored internal research highlighting Instagram's harmful effects on teenagers, including eating disorders, depression, and self-harm. They claimed Meta failed to disable addictive features like autoplay, notifications, and infinite scroll, which were designed to maximize user engagement and ad revenue. Meta's defense countered that the company is transparent about these risks and actively works to address them, emphasizing that protecting teens online is a shared responsibility among multiple stakeholders. The case could result in financial penalties and mandatory changes to Instagram's design to improve teen safety.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of corporate responsibility, emphasizing the negative impacts of Instagram on youth mental health and suggesting that Meta prioritized profits over user welfare. This aligns with progressive concerns about technology companies' influence on society and the '



